Miscellaneous News

quantumlight

quantumlight

Junior Member
Registered Member
localizer said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351560981172740104

Man I'm afraid of these religious types
Click to expand...
I have my own religion beliefs it involves the entire rest of the 2000s millennium OWNED by China, we have already made it folks... and China from the future every now and then sends help back to China of the past/present to make sure its on track for its predestination... kinda like a closed self-correcting temporal loop...
 
4Runner

4Runner

Junior Member
Registered Member
AssassinsMace said:
What is a D-10 going to do? Maybe have more control over the EU since Five Eyes didn't like them signing that investment deal. Maybe they can force Brazil not to make money selling soy beans to China so the US can make all the money and have leverage. What is it going to do beyond what alliances they already have? How about war? They're too chicken to go to war because what's really at the heart of the matter is the technology Cold War. Separate technology standards? It's the West that has everything to lose. They can't afford China, the world..., switching to a standard they're not in control of and therefore will not make any money from. That's what it's really about. That's why they can't go to war over it. It's not a crime when they're free to do with technology what they want to stop others from doing. Taunting a D-10 is a bluff hoping China surrenders from intimidation. The same tactic of how they were going to make China submit to TPP when it's not a member. They were hoping China didn't want to be left out and therefore surrender to their demands. Trump could've done a lot worse to China but it would come at an extreme cost to the US hence why he didn't just simply slap tariffs on the rest of "China's exports" aka corporate America's products they outsource to China so they can make every penny they can in profits. Everything else will cost even more. Maybe they can trick Indians to go to war with China so they don't waste their own resources and lives. Then when India loses, they can say they had nothing to do with it. Plausible deniability. It's only the West's survival at stake. Unless you see Westerners as gods and need their acceptance, the rest of the world only benefits. The things the West denies from the rest of the world is all about control. It's not China that wants to be in control as they charge. They're the ones that want to scare others into their influence. That's what they're trying to do to China right now. They want to be in control hence why they deny such things as technology and doesn't want China having it because they won't be making the money and start spreading it around when they deny it from others. By denying they can charge those they do sell it to a lot more for it. China provides alternatives therefore the price lowers due to competition. They don't like AIIB because they want to control who gets money to develop in this world so they can demand terms. They'll have to be generous to the rest of the world to counter China. With all the restrictions they place on China, China is the second most powerful country in the world and has number one, the US, worried about losing their place and with all their influence.
Click to expand...
Boris is getting desperate. UK is feeling desperate. They are in a process of self discovery, in which they find out Brits are the biggest suckers since they voted for Brexit. Once global hegemony. Still one of P5 in UN. But UK is sliding toward the second row of world affairs. So Boris wants to do a sneaky show of D10 and does the US bidding of containing China. But EU's big 2 are not buying it. Neither Japan. We have US, China, EU, Russia, Japan. Brits who? LMAO.
 
A

antiterror13

Brigadier
Chish said:
That 50 % efficiency was reported by Brazil, not sure under what situations/circumstances. Indonesia and Turkey reported far higher overall efficiency rates.
The Pfizer vaccine was not tested on seniors over 80 or young children, now they have to find out the cause of deaths of over 30 seniors immediately after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
Click to expand...
50% efficiency is against mild syndrome, so about 50% could still get mild syndrome. But the efficiency against severe syndrome is ~100%. So, the media only reporting half of the story, likely intentionally
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top