Pakistan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
@Deino

I will request again to please establish a guideline on reliable sources, otherwise we're going to keep running into this same problem. The easiest solution is just to establish a list of banned sources, and put FB etc. on it, and keep expanding the list as needed.
 
Last edited:

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
as my question still stands valid who decide whatever source (from anywhere around the globe) is reliable or not.... kindly answer specially (decision on source reliability) .... or on what basis will be challenge....

The mods need to decide this and there shouldn't be a "challenge" system. This isn't a court of appeals or a democratic parliament.

It needs to be a hard-set rule. Just one list of all the banned sources. Maybe a discussion thread in the suggestions forum for people who want to argue to place a source on/off it, but the mods need to have unity of command. It can't be a free for all, otherwise it will be a mess.
 

timepass

Brigadier
The mods need to decide this and there shouldn't be a "challenge" system. This isn't a court of appeals or a democratic parliament.


So, its a militarily court or we are in martial law, that's what you are basically saying ..... in that way any pseudo intellectual will discard any member post by labeling unreliable source.


It needs to be a hard-set rule. Just one list of all the banned sources. Maybe a discussion thread in the suggestions forum for people who want to argue to place a source on/off it, but the mods need to have unity of command. It can't be a free for all, otherwise it will be a mess.

I asked below the legitimate question and awaiting for logical answer (not police stick answer)....

as my question still stands valid who decide whatever source (from anywhere around the globe) is reliable or not.... kindly answer specially (decision on source reliability) .... or on what basis will be challenge....
 

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
So, its a militarily court or we are in martial law, that's what you are basically saying

... that's already how it works. Have you not noticed this?

When your friend got banned a few weeks back, was there an appeals process you went to? Was there a vote?
 

timepass

Brigadier
Oh No.... come on .... not again & again..... if you have nothing to justify against my question then stay away from the discussion (Oh well sorry I forget that you are very good in jumping on the gun) ...

By the way Which friend?

This is my last reply to you .... you may continue your rant.....
 

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
Dude, you have zero authority here. You can't force anyone to "stay away" from anything, nor is anyone afraid of you.

And yea sure, I've seen your "last replies" before, and then you continue replying 20 more times lolz.
 

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
Anyways....

If you subtract the legacy MBTs and the Ukranian T-80s (which are unreliable now because of Ukraine's issues), the only thing that's left are the 350 Al Khalids. This is a bad situation. But this was expected, because the Army willingly took a back seat for a while, to give priority to the PAF and PN in recent years, which is a good thing. It was a worthy sacrifice. Now that both the PAF/PN have stabilized, looks like the Army acquisitions are starting to gather steam again.

I think the Pakistani Army has a requirement of 1500 gen 3 tanks, and 500 gen 3+/4 tanks. It needs to retire all its legacy MBTs (including Al Zarrars.) Our MBT roster is way too clustered right now, and it surely puts a strain on logistics, especially the T-80s. It was just a bad idea to source anything from Ukraine in the first place. Instead of trying to maintain our T-80 fleet, we should mothball them, or sell them off, if anyone will buy them second hand. But it doesn't make much sense to maintain that unreliable logistical supply line only for 300 T-80s, especially since Pakistan is warming up to Russia.

I think a good split would be the following:

1000 - Al Khalid I
500 - VT-4
500 - Altay^ or Type 99A*

And if the Altay or Type 99A are unavailable (*export restrictions) or too expensive (^which they probably will be), than just create another upgrade of the Al Khalid I, add more armor and an APS and get 500 of those (or maybe 500 VT-4s, depending on their available addons). Either way, we should have a minimum of 2000 proper MBTs.
 
Last edited:

timepass

Brigadier
First I thought you were only an Idiot but You are a Liar as well .... go and check the status of my account at PDF right now .... It was NEVER BLOCKED at PDF in fact not at any defence forum .... so just SHUT UP

Waooo .... calling someone Idiot or Liar whose profile is with full of appreciations (check my profile) from the members is actually shows the level (mentality health) of a person itself so I have nothing to say anymore (silence is the best reply to a fool) .....



timepass
Brigadier

Messages - 6,669
Reaction score - 11,368 (Likes)
Trophy points - 413
 
Top