China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread
- Thread starter peace_lover
- Start date
- Status
America needs to a good look at its foreign policy and figure out how it manages to turn every tactical victory into a strategic defeat, and every strategic victory into backfiring into their face.
If Russia and other states taken down through regime change didn’t face ruin and collapse there might be more takers of the absolute bullshit they love to spew. If they were to suceed with their regime change plan in China, the resulting state would not necessary be cooperative with US global hegemony.
Frankly I’m not sure how they managed to turn Russia against them again after having completely duped the Soviet leadership and its people into committing geopolitical and economic suicide.
Because when it came/comes to Russia, there is no singular force in US strategy making. The hawks still have a hard-on for Cold War romanticism. The liberals want Russia to go the way of Japan post WW2 while becoming "progressives". The money wants to take over Russian energy.
China will not allow US takeover of Russian energy.
The DF-21 and DF-26 tests were launched from inland into SCS. That means their ranges are quite long. Imagine salvos of these launched at US cv group, that would be a deterrent in Chinese maritime territory.
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
They should publish the video when the missile just hit the moving ship that should settle once for all the question "Will it work?" That would be the ultimate warning and send strong message. I don't see any harm in releasing it what intelligence can you derive from that kind of video
I am still waiting so far nothing. I am pretty sure they have such video
They could have done that with the 2010 test and Yuanwang 4, but they didn't. I'm starting to think it's a clever trick. The people who really study this stuff and in the know understand the threat, but most politicians not cleared to see the data are still deluded about China's ability and thus still refuse to sink more money into R&D and military to counter this ability, giving China another 10 years of relative low profile to continue to develop both economically and militarily.
I wish it were actually true. China needs like 2,000 warheads and 1,000 deployed.
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
I doubt there is any technology in foreseeable time to counter this ASBM They have been fiddling with laser gun for 30 years now and all that they can show is laser gun to shoot small tugboat from 5000 feet.
In December 2014, the US Navy made a great show of their test of a laser weapon in what it called the “realistic threat environment” of the Persian Gulf. , made available to the press, showed the USS Ponce firing the Laser Weapon System to burn some holes through the sides of some speedboats, causing the boats’ contents to explode. Other tests apparently shot some drone replicas out of the sky.
In the USS Ponce tests, the distance of engagement appeared to be short—less than a mile. The sides of their speedboat target were thin, and the target drone aircraft appeared to be small. So, it was possible to accomplish a so-called “successful” test with a relatively low power, in the 10 to 20 kilowatt range. In addition, the short distances meant that a low-quality beam could be used, which tipped the scales because high-quality has long been the .
The same EM gun after spending close to 500 million dollars and 15 years nothing to show up
Last edited:
bajingan
Senior Member
The way things going with constant us provocations and hostilities, there is no choice for China but to increase her nuclear warheads
The concensus within CCP leadership is clear on this, it will be a crash nuclear build ups
China has even thinking of retaliating with nuclear weapons for certain cyber attacks
The concensus within CCP leadership is clear on this, it will be a crash nuclear build ups
China has even thinking of retaliating with nuclear weapons for certain cyber attacks
- Status