CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

Orthan

Senior Member
After a second look they are indeed there since some time and also they look more like movable halls/shelters, albeit smaller than the ones, which hide the carrier.

The modules are suposedly under those white shelters, not the yellow circle you created in that photo. Also this last photo show that they have still not taken the modules to the drydock with the big crane to be assembled.
 

Orthan

Senior Member
The modules are suposedly under those white shelters, not the yellow circle you created in that photo. Also this last photo show that they have still not taken the modules to the drydock with the big crane to be assembled.

Have anyone confirmed that those are the modules of the carrier? the photos that we have in this forum arent conclusive.
 

by78

General
A very grainy update, you can just about make out the modules ahead of dry dock #4.

50120448753_77905e6a7f_o.jpg
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
China steps up shipbuilding with two more aircraft carriers under construction towards 2035 navy goal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is from the SCMP "expert" so likely not accurate.

aec63bec-c7d6-11ea-86df-6d561651b5f4_image_hires_182855.JPG


afa224cc-c7d6-11ea-86df-6d561651b5f4_972x_182855.JPG
 
Last edited:

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
Then why did you post it if it's likely inaccurate?
According to many experts here, the author from SCMP is not accurate. I don't want to get criticized for posting something from SCMP. So you just use your own judgement when you read something from that SCMP "expert".
 

by78

General
According to many experts here, the author from SCMP is not accurate. I don't want to get criticized for posting something from SCMP. So you just use your own judgement when you read something from that SCMP "expert".

That doesn't make sense to me. If you had deemed the article inaccurate, and you expected to be criticized if you posted it, then why did you post it?
 
Top