I agree that there is no need (for the moment) for the central government to intervene in any form. That is to say "no need", but never ever "off the table". Hong Kong is important, but not that important. If troops had been deployed in Beijing, no where in China they could not be deployed.
The bold texts is a outright fiction (or lie) that anti-CCP does not equate to anti-China. It is a simple ploy by the western media to trick Chinese into destruct China, divide and rule, pitting one camp of Chinese against another. This tactic has been used in other forms recently such as:
- Qing is not Chinese dynasty but a foreign colonial power ruling (Han) Chinese. Manchu against Han.
- Yuan is not Chinese dynasty like Qing. Mongols against Han.
- Qidan, Jurchen etc. etc. etc. are foreign. Everyone against everyone.
- CCP invaded Tibet. Sounds like CCP is bad. Or is the Han Chinese being bad? Unti-CPP only? Or unti-China in truth.
- and so on and so forth.
Of course, at last, back to the topic. If these Hong Kong people (not all) is ONLY against CCP, I want to ask, and we know the answer (through many polls), how many people in Hong Kong, ESPACIALLY these protesters call themselves Chinese first and foremost? And no, the answer "I am Chinese, and also Hong Konger" does not count, just simple straight answer "I am Chinese.". How many?
The truth is, China is led by CCP today, just like Tang was ruled by Li clan, and Qing was ruled by Asin Gero clan, there is no way to sperate the country from the state, like it or not. Just like a passenger, crew and the captain on a ship is the same thing in the eyes of Poseidon.
Or, did the British in 1839 tell the Chinese peasants "Hey, I love you, but I come here to beat up your emperor for a debt"? What difference would that be anyway for a Chinese? Nothing.
Please stop "CCP this, and CCP that", the country has a name, People's Republic of China.