PresentDangerChina.org take on US-China relationship

Status
Not open for further replies.

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
1)Steve Bannon labelling US corporate and Wallstreet firms are foreign agents and traitors.
2)The goal of US is to take down Xi, and Wang Qishan of China CCP radical cadre.
3)Bannon said laid off Russia because of its small economy and christian values.


 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
who cares of Bannon anyway? he is done

He has a profound effect, even thought he's not physically in the white house currently, almost single idea he talked about is being carried out as policies by US government.

Even things that hasn't happen yet. He attacked Biden on couple points and I bet Trump will borrow his idea against Biden later on if he becomes a serious contestant on presidential race.

Based on his ideas, one can predict what trump will do.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Steve Bannon is the Joseph McCarthy of current time, his crusade and rampage is weep out or silence China sympathizers, actively denounce Corp America and Wallstreet firms speaking out for quick trade deal. Right now, he's able to silence alot of them.

He said US can defeat Xi regime in 2 years time. Maybe that's bit overly optimistic.
 

SpicySichuan

Senior Member
Registered Member
Well, one of Bannon's closest allies is Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui. Despite that fact that Guo is on Beijing's hit list, Chinese billionaires and millionaires like him is one interesting group to focus on. Many of these Chinese billionaires and millionaires actually hope to side with Trump in the U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry because the formers have been involved in corruption and power struggles within the CCP, so they hope the U.S.-led West could protect them from being handed back to China and prosecuted. My enemy's enemy is my friend!
 

Skywatcher

Captain
Bannon's more like a Dollar Store knock off of Julius Streicher (only hobo Steve can't commit on whether he hates the Chinese, homosexuals, Jews or Muslims most). At the Der Sturmer was consistent.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
One thing Bannon kind of contradict himself is that he claims China is even a bigger threat than Soviet Union during cold war. Well Soviet and US went at it for over 4 decades before Soviet collapsed. Yet, Bannon said China can be defeated in 2 yrs in trade war. A tougher opponent got defeated in much shorter time? That's a contradiction.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
US apparently knows China avoid kinetic warfare with US at all cost so that's why US gets up in China face militarily.

Bannon points out a book written by two PLA officers about strategy of defeating US through economic warfares, cyber attack, and other means but avoid direct warfares with US. It's written in Chinese but that guy Pillsbury fluent in Chinese and he read about it and after that he wrote the book one hundred year marathon , and since that the alarm Bell on China sounded.

That book done alot of damage to China. Every antiChina hawk in US read about Pillsbury one hundred year marathon.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
The assumption of antiChina Hawks is by destroying China economy, it will cause regime change and stop China military buildup.

That assumption cannot hold,even economy crash, as long as China have enough food for everyone. Then people would just work for food or barter As long as they have the knowledge and know how. Food security is number 1 priority.
 

Skywatcher

Captain
Honestly, I think Pillsbury wrote that book as a cash in (no serious China watcher, hawk or dove, that I ever met took the Hundred Year Marathon seriously).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top