China's strategy in Korean peninsula

[Klon]

OK Cool. Firstly, I don't want to discuss things for the sake of discussing things, especially when they are sooooo far away from being relevant to the topic of Sino-Korean relations. I wish none of this happened; we were good and on topic until Anvsnligh came and now everything is a total off-topic mess. I wish a mod would delete everything, but I got baited into this stupid discussion because he kept saying ridiculous things including how China's tech can't ever catch up because supercomputers are just regular computers hooked up to each other, how China would meet its maker (some nonsense religious reference) and how the China-Korea relationship depends on the US being willing to sell/buy things. I'm not even particularly interested in the US trade deficit so even if a thread were opened for it, I wouldn't check there. If you asked a question to bait me into that discussion, I'm not interested. If you wanted an answer for yourself because you're not in the habit of checking things that you don't understand, see here:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

First article that comes up has a promising title, doesn't it? Enjoy

There isn't any real need to discuss anything. It's good you won't make more claims about things you don't know about, such as most economic concepts.

 

[manqiangrexue]

There isn't any real need to discuss anything. It's good you won't make more claims about things you don't know about, such as most economic concepts.

The only person here who has made claims on things he didn't understand are you and your twin. If I have, point them out. You've tried and shot yourself in the foot every time. Try again if you want.

And once again, not knowing is better than knowing the wrong thing like you, especially when I have the habit of checking references when I don't know/not sure.

 

[Klon]

The only person here who has made claims on things he didn't understand are you and your twin. If I have, point them out. You've tried and shot yourself in the foot every time. Try again if you want.

And once again, not knowing is better than knowing the wrong thing like you, especially when I have the habit of checking references when I don't know/not sure.

I've pointed out enough examples of your mistakes. Most notably you admitted that you didn't even know what others were talking about when writing your tangential responses. That you shy away from a discussion of the US deficit despite previously making grand claims about it shows that you wouldn't be able to hold your own. If you like, I can tell you how you are wrong about trade war.
I'm looking forward to correcting any false claims you make in the future.

 

[montyp165]

In quantum mechinics the observation doesn't change the outcome, it collapse the wave function to one of its probable state.
The probability expressed as complex amplitude normalised in every calculation, means it is not possible to analyse the system with standard, scalar statistical tools.

The economics is a social science, not natural science .
It define relationship between humans, like law .

Informational states of complexity can still exhibit similar characteristics even if the condition of measure is of a different field for study however, as information much like energy still has a principle of conservation to it as well.

 

[AssassinsMace]

Gordon Chang was on the phone on Fox News blaming Hawaii's missile alert false alarm on hacking by North Korea, China, or Russia even after word came it was a staff error in Hawaii. The only one that would want a war to start are factions in the US that have been clamoring for an attack to show the US's strength.

 

[Anlsvrthng]

Japan failed to increase consumption because of deflationary spiral and expectation that price will go down even further They try to increase the inflation rate with no success because they failed to follow thru with economic reform Japan economy is beholden to special interest and rigid



Moreover, with exports stagnating and domestic consumption sluggish, the private sector is far from eager to make capital investments. The principal factor that has prevented the easy money policy of unconventional dimensions from producing tangible results is the fact that the third arrow has not yet been fired.

So, let see the basic. If the production capacity lower than the customer demand then there is inflation , if the production capacity higher vs demand then there is deflation.
If the capacity is higher then there is no reason for the businesses to invest. Easy , isn't it?

The businesses are not chairties, they won't pay out money for supplier and workers just to employ them without making any profit.

Mexico, Brazil, Argentina failed to escape the middle income trap because they use the surplus for consumption in the form of better social welfare and other subsidy for the poor
China use the surplus for investment in the form of infrastructure, industrial upgrading, education, and buying resources, investment in BRI to open market for Chinese industry, relatively open market compare to Japan. But most important is the energetic, risk taker of Chinese entrepreneur and creative
Which will prepare Chinese economy for upturn. Those thing are relatively missing in Latin America

China is now richer than Brazil,Argentina on percapita basis with projected GDP/percapita of $9000 in real term for 2017
And the World bank classification of high-income economies are those with a GNI per capita of $12,476 or more. The updated GNI per capita estimates are also used as input to the World Bank's operational guidelines that determines lending eligibility.

Mexico GDP PPI (2016) higher than the Chinese one.

And again, simple logic:
IF the country runnign trade surpluss then it has more production capacity than consumption capacity .
Then why this country doing capital investment?

 

[Dolcevita]

Gordon Chang was on the phone on Fox News blaming Hawaii's missile alert false alarm on hacking by North Korea, China, or Russia even after word came it was a staff error in Hawaii. The only one that would want a war to start are factions in the US that have been clamoring for an attack to show the US's strength.

Tells us that people who watch Fox News are constantly misinformed and cannot be credible.

 

[Anlsvrthng]

Gordon Chang was on the phone on Fox News blaming Hawaii's missile alert false alarm on hacking by North Korea, China, or Russia even after word came it was a staff error in Hawaii. The only one that would want a war to start are factions in the US that have been clamoring for an attack to show the US's strength.

This is quite frequent now.

The US media starting to sound like war propaganda, tuning up the country for full war.

 

[broadsword]

Who cares about the news?
There is border control in the UK ,so it is irrelevant for them.

The immigrants that they see is the Poles, spanish from europe, who snapping up the job offers for low sallaries.

They not fear from the raping syrian, they fear from the Catholic polish technician and the spanish engineer.

You don't care, other people care.

So you think, as supported by your asking talking around, that employment was the reason people voted Brexit. But are you aware that 75% of the young voters, aged 24 and below, voted remain?
More of the older voters voted for Brexit.

One more thing I want to ask is the racial makeup of the people you talked to. Were they mostly caucasians?

 

[manqiangrexue]

I've pointed out enough examples of your mistakes. Most notably you admitted that you didn't even know what others were talking about when writing your tangential responses. That you shy away from a discussion of the US deficit despite previously making grand claims about it shows that you wouldn't be able to hold your own. If you like, I can tell you how you are wrong about trade war.
I'm looking forward to correcting any false claims you make in the future.

You mean you've pointed out enough of my typos? LOL impressive. So the summary of your response is that you cannot list any specific claim that I made and why it is wrong, so you decided to generalize a paragraph of trash about me being wrong to make it sound like I was wrong somewhere, right?

I didn't know what he was talking about because his writing was a mess, but I guessed that he was wrong judging by the kind of person that he is, and it lead to my being right. If you insist I didn't know what was going on, that's more embarrassing for you; that's like saying I beat you in a boxing match with a blindfold on.

The 2 claims I made about the US deficit are listed here: https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinas-strategy-in-korean-peninsula.t6680/page-133#post-491303. Feel free to discuss those. Yes, I would like you to tell me where I was wrong. Next time, don't ask; just do it. Tell me where I was wrong on the trade war issue, without making up what I said. I said that the US would not benefit from a trade war with China. Go ahead and tell me whatever you want but the evidence is that the US acts in its own interests, and it has not initiated a trade war, therefore it would not be in its interests or benefit. Anything you provide is just an opinion, just like Gordon Chang's. But when you are wrong, it is factually wrong.

Aside from those 2 things I said, I will not discuss this random topic with you on an unrelated thread. Like I said, if I wanted to, all I need to do is check references like I usually do, and I could hold my debate any time, and at your rate, you'll make a wrong statement about every other post. Shy away from what? You asked me questions, so I listed sources for you to read. If you have any more, feel free to ask. I'll link you all the articles that you need to answer your own question. Did you need me to read them and regurgitate paragraphs to you? I'm not your middle school teacher. You need to be at a higher level and capable of independent learning to debate here.

Oh, I know you look forward to correcting me very much because other than typos, you've found nothing. That's why you desperately want to start new topics with questions hoping I'll finally make a mistake and you get to correct me for once, not the other way around. That's not how it works. LOL You're like the guy who lost a bet (or 2 or 3 in your case) that you got yourself into so you're trying to win your money back with, "Hey, let's bet again! You know how many countries are in South America? I'll bet you! Or how about who the real identity of the second Green Lantern? Come on, answer! Name the top 10 countries in the world by land mass! I'll bet! Why are you shying away? You can't hold your own! Gimme a chance to win my money back!!" LOL Asking random questions and hoping someone will eventually answer one wrong is not how you get your dignity restored.