US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

‘Pencils down’: What are the top six areas McCarthy wants tech to zero in on
sounds complicated
Acting Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy and Gen. Mark Milley, the service’s chief of staff, have narrowed down their technological emphasis to six areas.

Add if you’re an Army scientist working on something outside those six buckets?

“Pencils down, work on this,” McCarthy said. “They’re going to have work to do. There’s plenty of work to do, I just need them to work on very discreet issues.”

The six areas are a long-range precision fires capability that “restores U.S. Army dominance in range, munitions and target acquisition;” a next-generation combat vehicle; future vertical lift capabilities; an army network capable of operating in an environment “where the electromagnetic spectrum is denied or degraded;” high-end air and missile defense capabilities, including against drones; and improving capabilities at the soldier level, both through training and technology.

McCarthy, speaking to reporters Monday, said exactly how funding for these focus areas is being worked out, saying the Army “made some decisions” as it worked on its fiscal year 2019 budget request. But he indicated there are still some calls to be made pending the results of a review of the science and technology enterprise.

“Within those six, those go across multiple colors of money,” he said. “The S&T review itself that I mentioned is that I’ve asked leadership to go work with the labs to look at all the projects in the system. Are they supportive to these six capabilities or not? That would be additional funds to the move within the balance sheet.”

More broadly, the investments will come in both increasing research and procuring capacity, with the money “spread across, based on the maturity of the capability,” he added.

At least two current programs seem likely to win under the new S&T focus. Asked whether the Army Tactical Missile System or Paladin Integrated Management program would fit under the long-range precision fires category, McCarthy said “They’re both clearly priorities. … Those are exactly the capabilities. I don’t know if they move the dollars. But that would fall into the No. 1 test.”

Asked whether the current continuing resolution, which locks budget figures into FY 2017 levels, will affect these specific technological buckets, McCarthy said, “I couldn’t give you fidelity on which of the six would be affected more than the other off the top of my head. But it’s clear we need to get the budget passed. I can’t say much more than that.”
source is DefenseNews
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Sep 28, 2017
I'm afraid I now read Army to halt WIN-T, its battlefield network backbone
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I'm guessing the author didn't mean to use "not" in the sentence

"The Army’s strategy now is to rapidly fix the network by taking funds from the portions of the network that are not working and realigning money to address capability gaps."

but, under the circumstances, who knows LOL!
while
Army doubles down on WIN-T’s ‘fight tonight’ problem
13 hours ago
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Less than two weeks after Army officials announced they plan to nix the service’s $6 billion
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, leaders are emphasizing the need to immediately move forward with alternate solutions in order to save troops’ lives.

Amid congressional inquiry, officials said Sept. 27 that the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical, or WIN-T, program would end as Army leaders reroute funding to alternate capabilities that are more agile, secure and threat-responsive. The move involves shifting nearly half a billion dollars in funding in order to better secure communications in the theater.

“We have two big problems. We have a ‘fight tonight’ issue; we have significant gaps in terms of complexity and vulnerabilities, in terms of the evolution of near-term threats,” Lt. Gen. Bruce Crawford, the Army‘s G-6/chief information officer, said Oct. 9 at the Association of the U.S. Army‘s annual meeting in Washington.

“There are vulnerabilities we know about now related specifically to anti-jam … so these resources are literally to buy things to fix the ‘fight tonight’ issue. The second part is fundamental process issues. The process we’ve been using to purchase IT is based on large platforms” instead of on the pace of technology.

Crawford said WIN-T and the Army’s related IT and communications problems are the product of more than a decade and a half at war, “a 16-year problem in need of a one-year solution” given the urgency of the situation. But in a broad-reaching, $6 billion morass, what gets addressed first, and where exactly will the money go in order to generate short-term answers?

A top priority will be “deconflicting mission command complexity,” said Gary Martin, program executive officer for command, control and communications-tactical. “If you go to any of our [combat training centers], on average it takes 40 to 50 hours just to bring up network. And that’s [because of] a combination of things,” including the complexity of the network and the need to manually configure networks — something that increasingly must be done in short order, on the move.

To streamline, the Army is targeting tools and technology that are less complicated and easier for soldiers on the ground to operate. It’s a problem Crawford and other Army leaders acknowledged has taken a long time and concerted effort to attempt to fix.

Other key areas of emphasis involve toughening troops against interference with satellite communications, including through more use of tropospheric transmission capabilities that extend the network and enable communication amid loss of satellite communication. And then there’s the push to simplify and restructure command posts themselves, making them lighter, more mobile and less susceptible to enemies intercepting signatures and communications that reveal soldiers’ locations.

“There’s a transport piece, a mission command suite part of this, and fixing the command post problem — we can’t wish it away,” Crawford said.

“Peer adversaries have been developing [capabilities] — not just electronic warfare and cyber — with the ability to link sensor to shooter. They’re able to sense us and link to direct and indirect fire capabilities that can kill. Survivability of the command post is based on real threats and the realization that while fighting 16 years of combat, our peers have also gone to school on us and developed capabilities that put us at significant risk if we don’t mitigate that risk.”
 
Jun 13, 2017
let me see my latest on Stingray ... Apr 15, 2017

now Navy Has Picked the First Two Carriers to Fly MQ-25A Stingray Unmanned Aerial Refueling Tankers

it's USNI News
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the story goes on as
Navy Releases Final MQ-25 Stingray RFP; General Atomics Bid Revealed
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Naval Air Systems Command has quietly released the final request for proposals to industry for the unmanned MQ-25 Stingray aerial tanker, USNI News has learned.

Last week, the Navy issued the RFP to four industry competitors for the air segment of what will be the service’s Navy’s first operational carrier-based unmanned aerial vehicle ahead of an anticipated contract award by September of next year, a NAVAIR spokeswoman told USNI News on Tuesday.

The competitors are Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and General Atomics.

The Navy wants to field the capability on its carriers to alleviate the strain on the existing F/A-18E/F Super Hornets that are burning through flight hours while serving as a refueling tanker for other aircraft attempting to land on the aircraft carrier. Up to 20 to 30 percent of Super Hornet sorties are refueling missions.

While the Navy has been reluctant about the specific goals of the program, the service’s basic requirements will have the Stingray deliver about 15,000 pounds of fuel 500 nautical miles from the carrier.

“The MQ-25 will give us the ability to extend the air wing out probably 300 or 400 miles beyond where we typically go. We will be able to do that and sustain a nominal number of airplanes at that distance,”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
“That will extend the reach of the air wing, and when we combine that with additional weapons we are buying, we will get an impressive reach.”

The current effective strike radius of a Super Hornet is about 450 miles, and the MQ-25 could extend the range to more than 700 nautical miles.

Of the four companies vying for the business, General Atomics has released the first complete images of its planned bid for Stingray.

The aircraft is a wing-body-tail design that shares design characteristics with the General Atomics Avenger design, including a turbofan engine and V-shaped tailfins.

The image, provided to USNI News, show the GA Stingray concept fielding a standard D-704 buddy tank refueling system.

While company representatives didn’t reveal details of the bid, like aircraft dimensions or internal fuel capacity, they did point out some features unique to the GA bid. The aircraft will have an electro-optical ball like GA’s MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper UAVs; landing gear that pulls into the fuselage, which is reminiscent of the old S-3 Viking anti-submarine warfare aircraft; and a system for maneuvering around the flight deck using gestures from the flight crew, retired Rear Adm. Terry Kraft who now works for General Atomics told USNI News on Saturday.

In addition to the carrier suitability requirements set by the Navy, GA has included a margin for growth.

“You can see a future for weaponization, you could see a future for ISR capability. The Navy has already asked us to put hooks in there for a radar and I think it’s very logical that the first spiral would be some type of radar installation,” Kraft said.
“At the end of the day, the UAV is a truck.”
 
BAT-72.jpg

BAT 72 B-2 Spirit from the 509th BW (Whiteman AFB) takes fuel from FORCE 26, a KC-10 from the 305th AMW (Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst). 0 Dark Thirty over southwest Missouri.
from the collection inside
We Encountered The B-2 Stealth Bomber At Night in Stormy Skies To Get These Crazy Cool Photos. Here’s How It Went.

Oct 09 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I am not surprised in this but they appear to be based around General Atomics Predator C Avenger which was designed as a CATBAR bird. View attachment 42444 View attachment 42445
the 2nd :cool:

But what stupidity to have retired KA-6B after S-3 modified without replacement !
mainly with Super Hornet replacing F-14 - also after F-18 - which have a longer range, A-6 had the best.

US Navy CAW 1990-2010-2025.jpg
Now in general by CVN : 36 F-18EF, 10 F-18C, 5 EA-18G some Sqns have 6 and 5 E-2D
and UCLASS now a tanker.
 
Last edited:
Sep 23, 2017
Today at 4:30 PM

and AirForceMag
KC-46 Problem Poses “Significant Risk,” Imperils Stealth
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now the story goes on with PICTURE: KC-46A refuels another KC-46A

12 October, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A Boeing KC-46A tanker has refuelled another KC-46A for the first time.

The work took place during a four-hour flight in which the two aircraft refuelled each other, says Boeing in a statement.

The pair achieved the maximum offload rate of 1,200 gallons per minute, and transferred 38,100lbs of fuel. The activity involved personnel from both Boeing and the US Air Force.

"The milestone flight helps pave the way for the next phases of certification and specification compliance testing," says Boeing.

It adds that the KC-46 has completed 2,000 flight hours and 1,300 contacts with types including the Lockheed Martin F-16, as well as the AV-8B, A-10, C-17, and KC-10.

In late September, the USAF's Air Mobility Command revealed that boom scraping issues and a slew of completed test points could delay delivery of the 767-based type until 2018.
getasset.aspx
 
Top