Jura The idiot
General
ВОЕННЫЙ ОБОЗРЕВАТЕЛЬWhat's the source for this?

ВОЕННЫЙ ОБОЗРЕВАТЕЛЬWhat's the source for this?
So the laws of war allow US to kill soldiers in their own country without being at war with that country? How do they make that out?Sep 17, 2016
now Pentagon: No misconduct in mistaken airstrike on Syrian forces
source (it's very recent, dated 11:15 a.m. EST November 29, 2016):
Clearly because the laws of war were only mentioned for the purpose of obfuscation.So the laws of war allow US to kill soldiers in their own country without being at war with that country? How do they make that out?
Israel military fires missiles against targets near Damascus: Report
Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:48AM
An Israeli warplane have carried our missile attacks against two targets inside Syria close to the highway connecting the capital Damascus, to the Lebanese capital Beirut.
Syria’s state television reported on Wednesday that the Israeli air force had fired two missiles from the Lebanese airspace towards an area near Damascus. It said the attack had fallen short of causing any casualties.
Meanwhile, Rai al-Youm, an Arab world digital news and opinion website, said the attacks had struck a district identified as Sabourah.
One of the strikes, it said, hit a Syrian army's arms depot, while another targeted a number of trucks thought to be carrying weapons and military equipment.
Al-Masdar News, a pan-Arab news and commentary website based in Boston, also said the warplane had fired long-range ‘Popeye’ missiles at the district, located west of Damascus.
The air-to-surface missiles have been developed by the Israeli military itself.
“The jet did not penetrate Syrian airspace but did allegedly breach Lebanese airspace in order to come within striking range of its designated target,” it reported.
Israel is widely viewed as a staunch supporter of the Takfiri terrorists operating against the Damascus government.
The regime regularly targets the Syrian side of the Golan Heights, parts of which it has occupied since 1967.
Tel Aviv also provides treatment to anti-Syria Takfiri terrorists who sustain injuries on the battlefield against the Syrian army.
In the past, Israeli jets have time and again carried out sorties inside the Syrian territory under various pretexts.
Back in May, an Israeli strike against Damascus claimed the life of Mustafa Badreddine, a senior Hezbollah commander.
Lebanon’s Hezbollah resistance movement, which fought off two Israeli wars in 2006 and 2008 at home, has been successfully helping Syria to defend itself in the face of terrorists and to prevent the spillover of the crisis into Lebanon.
then Government concentrated on "carving" (instead of frontal assault(s) Iraqis-in-Mosul-before-the-US-elections-style) and at first took over areas south to the major road marked "5" below in Ramouseh and Sheikh Saeed districts:
We all know that law has to be enforced by violent means (batons, paper spry, handcuff, pistol or even M-16). Without these means, the value of law book (being totally useless) is less than toilet paper.So the laws of war allow US to kill soldiers in their own country without being at war with that country? How do they make that out?
That reminds me of the policy of Chinese communist forces towards the KMT forces in the last days of the Chinese civil war before 1949.It is worth noting that according to the General Staff, about 650 militants in recent days laid down their arms, and most of them had already received amnesty. This is not surprising, as if not a strict control on the part of "An-Nusra", many militias were ready to go for it before, but were afraid of reprisals. When you collapse a single defense and the loss of control over the situation in the city by the "Al-Nusra 'vacillating fighters immediately began to look for ways to give the Syrian army to stay alive.
In general, long-term strategy of the Syrian government related to amnesty ordinary militants yields results as it allows to weaken the resistance in boilers and enclaves. Minimized the destruction, cut the victim from all sides, some areas are returning to civilian life - all these contribute to the future of post-war Syria.
Many local fighters surrendered and stayed in their town or village that was then not occupied but defended in future by the same fighters while those of their colleagues that didn't want to stay were taken by bus to Idlib or some other "opposition" area. It was described in am article in The "Independent" by a British journalist whose name I just now can't remember but I think I copied it to this thread. I'll look for it.That reminds me of the policy of Chinese communist forces towards the KMT forces in the last days of the Chinese civil war before 1949.
I don't know if the Syrian government is willing to go that far as the Chinese. In the Chinese case, the communist not only give amnesty to the surrendered KMT forces, but also let them join the ranks of communist forces, individually or in full formation. The difference between mere surrender and joining is obvious, one changes from untrusted enemy fighter to a trusted comrade. There are quite many former KMT soldiers and generals became prominent in PRC afterwards.
Some may say that Syria is sectarian divided, the rebel fighters can never be trusted. But another Chinese case tells otherwise. During the Muslim rebelling in 1870s, many Muslim rebels switched side to the Qing government in the later stage in return for pardon and rewards, some even ended up as top generals who remained loyal to the Qing court until its end.
People are different on the surface, but very same deep inside. If it is doable, I would hope Syria do it.