ISIS/ISIL conflict in Syria/Iraq (No OpEd, No Politics)

delft

Brigadier
From WaPo comes this article:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

that says:
The Syrian Arab Red Crescent said it had registered 4,000 new arrivals in the Jibreen district of government-held western Aleppo. An additional 6,000 people were reported to have reached the Kurdish-controlled area of Sheik Maksoud.
and
Eastern Aleppo’s rebel-run council says that at least 500 civilians have been killed and 1,500 wounded in the latest offensive.
This suggest that the Syrian forces are very careful to avoid civilian casualties as far as possible.
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Nov 18, 2016

... now I can answer: Rebels have lost about forty percent since then:
CyWJfr-VIAAzv7_.jpg:large

What a day and what a rout! I would not have dared to predict the northern salient to collapse so quickly, but that I guess is what fire control over an area is actually all about.

So what next? My best guess is that it will now switch to roads - Securing the Airport road for use on the Northern Front and securing the Ring Road for use at the Southern.
In addition a new push at the new middle section of the rebel territory to join Police Hill with the Citadel and split the territory in half once more.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
common, post links or say you're conjuring
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
28 September 2015
And I quote
The Israeli military
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
claiming that it had struck two military positions controlled by the Syrian government in response to stray rockets that landed in the 70 percent of the Golan Heights occupied by Israel.

Writing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Israeli army spokesman Peter Lerner said that two rockets - one on Saturday and a second on Sunday evening - were "misfired" into the Israeli-occupied territory. Neither rocket resulted in any injuries or damages.

Yet the statement said that Israel "holds the Syrian military responsible for all events stemming from its territory and will not tolerate any attempt to harm Israel's sovereignty and the safety of its residents".
Now, stop pretending stupid, stop accusing others with nothing in your hands.

A piece of advice, next time if you still want to do the same, prepare some real "ammunition", otherwise you will be shot at point blank.
 
Sep 17, 2016
Absolute madness!
Some Eighty Syrian Soldiers killed by US Airstrike as they fought off an ISIS offensive in the besieged city of Deir Ezzor

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This will probably kill the Cease Fire and most likely any attempt at a Peace Process.
now Pentagon: No misconduct in mistaken airstrike on Syrian forces
A U.S. military investigation into a mistaken airstrike that likely killed dozens of "Syrian-aligned" forces in September found no misconduct on the part of U.S.-led coalition pilots or commanders who approved the attack, the U.S. military said Tuesday.

The forces were mistakenly identified as Islamic State fighters, partly because they were armed and were not dressed in conventional military uniforms, the investigation by the U.S. Central Command determined. The investigation also concluded that intelligence and communications mishaps contributed to the mistake.

"The evidence showed there was not a deliberate disregard of targeting procedures or the rules of engagement," Central Command said in a statement.

Air Force Brig. Gen. Richard Coe, the investigating officer, said the forces resembled Islamic State militants. “In many ways, these forces looked and acted like the Da’esh forces the coalition has been targeting for the last two years,” Coe said in a statement, using an Arabic name for the Islamic State.

“The decision to strike these targets was made in accordance with the law of armed conflict and the applicable rules of engagement," Coe said. "But we concluded based upon post-strike analysis that a number of ‘human factors’ resulted in incorrect identification of forces on the ground.”

Officials said they have already begun to change procedures based on the Sept. 17 incident. “In this instance, we did not rise to the high standard we hold ourselves to, and we must do better than this each and every time,” Lt. Gen. Jeff Harrigian, commander of U.S. air forces in the Middle East, said in a statement.

The investigation concluded that the incident revealed errors in developing intelligence and missed opportunities for analysts "to recognize and voice contrary evidence to decision makers."

One analyst concluded that the forces were probably not the Islamic State, but those reservations did not reach decision makers who would authorize the strike.

The investigation could not identify the forces conclusively but said it was "likely that those struck were aligned with the Syrian government," the statement said.

Coe said the investigation was not able to determine if the forces targeted were Syrian government troops or members of militias that are fighting alongside the regime of Bashar Assad.

Coe said at least 15 people were killed in the attack, but investigators could not visit the site to make a conclusive determination.

The coalition aircraft dropped 34 precision bombs and other munitions in addition to 380 rounds from a 30-millimeter cannon.

The Russian Defense Ministry said at the time that 62 Syrian troops were killed in the airstrike.

The incident occurred as the United States and Russia were at loggerheads over a failed effort to implement a cease-fire in Syria's civil war. Each country accused the other of violating terms of the cease-fire.

Secretary of State John Kerry said at the time that the airstrike was a mistake, but he charged that Russia would not admit that Syrian or Russian warplanes had struck an aid convoy attempting to get to the rebel-held city of Aleppo. “We did it, a terrible accident,” Kerry said. “Within moments of it happening, we acknowledged it. We didn’t put out a bunch of obfuscating facts.”

The incident highlights the complexity of the civil war. Russian forces back the Assad regime and have been striking U.S.-backed rebels, according to the Pentagon. Russia says it is fighting the Islamic State, one of many groups trying to topple Assad.

U.S.-led forces are targeting Islamic State fighters, not Syrian government forces, even though the Obama administration wants Assad to step down.

The Pentagon is not coordinating airstrikes with Russian forces, but the two share information to avoid a mishap that could lead to a broader war.
source (it's very recent, dated 11:15 a.m. EST November 29, 2016):
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
(at first I noticed in Russian Internet
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)
Turkey entered Syria to end al-Assad’s rule: President Erdoğan
...
“Why did we enter? We do not have an eye on Syrian soil. The issue is to provide lands to their real owners. That is to say we are there for the establishment of justice. We entered there to end the rule of the tyrant al-Assad who terrorizes with state terror. [We didn’t enter] for any other reason,” the president said.
...
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top