F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Sometimes with your comments I really have the impression of being in a simulator :)

Outstanding Forbin, my long love for everything with wings is due to my Daddy likely thinking about flying as I was being "conceived"???? He was a pilots pilot, squadron Check Pilot in the C-130, all business and no nonsense, even as he was teaching me the basics of real airmanship. I read the Dash-One for the C-130 as my reading primer, and was likely the only first grader who knew how to "pull the fire handles on those Allisons, and if the fire didn't go out, twist the handle and hit it again! LOL

I hated reading, and cried every night as my MOM, made me read, pretty soon it clicked, I found flying and flying magazines, I can still remember reading one of the first articles about the new "Cessna Aerobat" and being so excited, around 1969 or so??? I later spent a LOT of time in a C-150 Aerobat with the checkerboard paint on the wings. NO real aerobatics, but LOTS and LOTS of very steep turns, hard pulls, low level passes, and ONE fuel starvation incident at 300 ft going straight up! LOL

One thing my Dad drilled into me, "ALL airplanes fly alike", and its true, just have to change the numbers, and the scale, it has been something of an adjustment for me to fly the 1946 Ercoupe 415C as there is only one brake pedal on the floor, and it is under the "rudder pedals", most Ercoupes were built without rudder pedals as the Ercoupe interconnects the rudder and ailerons. You "steer" the aircraft on the ground with the yoke, as the nose gear is also interconnected to the rudder and ailerons, very different, but I was able to get in the Ercoupe and fly-it safely with just a brief check flight, in spite of some fairly heavy cross-winds.

So your pictures make it quite obvious that the F-35 is a "heavy hitter", as is the F-22, and I would remind everyone, that the F-35 is a "much safer" aircraft in the low speed regime than the F-16. The F-35 is designed to be very "departure resistant" and that picture is testament, that even below its happy airspeeds, the pilot is able to form up and hold formation on the lead F-16, due to that very user friendly and safe airframe and flight control system. The F-22 will fly even slower, at around 85 knts indicated, but it takes a LOT of thrust, and that is the secret to that LockMart sweetness, well designed lifting body fuselage and wing, and LOTS of thrust.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
A new country Danmark deal not signed but impossible or almost they buy other now.
Mainly a good number replace one by one F-16 they have 30, in 2 Sqns not as Netherlands 37 for 60 ! but maybe some in more coz seems nap is over in Western Europe :rolleyes: some Panzer in more and others mainly no decreases from several months :cool:

Belgium want about same number, I don' t see Canada do one other choice " so close " USA .

Denmark picks F-35 for 27-aircraft deal

Denmark’s government and defence ministry have recommended the selection of the Lockheed Martin F-35 as the nation’s future combat aircraft, following an evaluation involving the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and Eurofighter Typhoon.

Announced by prime minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and defence minister Peter Christensen on 12 May, the proposal to acquire 27 conventional take-off and landing F-35As comes after a panel of experts ranked the type first in all criteria.

The US type “will entail the greatest potential for promoting Danish interests, in terms of both security policy and military strategy”, and “provide the highest degree of flexibility at the political level with regards to future tasks”, the defence ministry states.

During the assessment, the Typhoon was ranked second – but most expensive – and the Boeing candidate third. A summary document notes: “the small group of Super Hornet users and the geographical location of those users far from Denmark’s neighbouring areas have been contributing factors”.

As a long-term international partner on the F-35 project, the European nation had previously projected a potential buy as being for 30 units. However the defence ministry says the new figure of 27 reflects economic challenges being faced by the nation. If completed, an acquisition would replace its Lockheed F-16AM/BMs.

Noting that Copenhagen’s proposed selection will be debated in parliament within a month, Lockheed says the downselect decision “positions Danish industry to capture long-term work throughout the life of the programme.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
A new country Danmark deal not signed but impossible or almost they buy other now.
Mainly a good number replace one by one F-16 they have 30, in 2 Sqns not as Netherlands 37 for 60 ! but maybe some in more coz seems nap is over in Western Europe :rolleyes: some Panzer in more and others mainly no decreases from several months :cool:

Belgium want about same number, I don' t see Canada do one other choice " so close " USA .

That is exactly right, the F-35 is the ONLY bird that will be able to "penetrate" those Russian air-defenses, and get you IN, and OUT, which is equally important! The Russians are moving lots of equipment and personnel to the border regions, as they attempt to intimidate Europe into backing off those sanctions, put in place after the Russian invasion of Eastern Ukraine, and the taking of Crimea.

The US is standing firm with NATO, which is NOW, as important, if not more important than it ever has been! Sadly Mr. Trump, now the Republican GOP nominee for president, is the only one of the 17 or so candidates that may not understand what is a at stake. Mr. Obama's weakness on foreign policy with regard to Russia, is what lead Mr. Putin to take back these former Soviet territiories in Georgia and the Crimea, cherry picking what he really wanted????

so Europe is NOW on alert, and while some in Europe are afraid to stand up, most of the smart folks realize that it is well past time to "arm up", NATO and Europe will be very well served by the F-35, and the USAF is standing up its first "operational squadron later this year, possibly even by late summer??? but, USAF is bring the F-35 up to speed, and USAF just finished a "Rapid Raptor" exercise, demonstrating its ability to place a decisive number of F-22s in theatre in a few hours!

That 12 Raptors are operationally significant is testament to the Raptor's insane capabilities!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
GAO report intresting and not only for money better
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Orders planned up to 2038 then last deliveries 2040/41, to maximum 120 : 80A, 20B and 20C. In fact up to 3 USAF Sqns by year, a Wing !

Page 9 Blocks, planned up to a Block 7 right now, especialy Block 5 which normaly will allow to F-35 carried 6 AIM-120D internaly.

F-35 commandes.PNG
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

THIS is the "electric jet" Bub, that's what we wanted, and that's what we've got??? It is also AF-3 which is an "early bird", so part of what you get with concurrency is the need to go back and up-grade that aircraft to the specs. These are things which you sometimes "work around" until you get a handle on what is actually causing these issues, in this case the red team will pick this apart until they find the "smoking gun"?

This is truly a "modular" system, with the ability to "plug and play", it is very complex, but also maintainable in the long-run, they will get it up and running!
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
THIS is the "electric jet" Bub, that's what we wanted, and that's what we've got??? It is also AF-3 which is an "early bird", so part of what you get with concurrency is the need to go back and up-grade that aircraft to the specs. These are things which you sometimes "work around" until you get a handle on what is actually causing these issues, in this case the red team will pick this apart until they find the "smoking gun"?

This is truly a "modular" system, with the ability to "plug and play", it is very complex, but also maintainable in the long-run, they will get it up and running!

I understand fully brutha.. We're talking a system with hundreds of millions of lines of code needing to work in concert. Unlike many aircraft before her her issue is more software than hardware related...like the test pilot said sometimes no matter what u do, the only way to fix it is a reboot and everything goes back to normal not unlike a computer or any device that relies primarily on software and program subroutines to function.

I worry that because it is 100% reliant on code, it may never be fully reliable but I also realized that is the way of the future. We just have to take into account this gap and find other way to mitigate so it's readiness rate is no different than our father's analog driven jets.
 
Top