US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
When we were at Little Rock AFB, they operated a squadron of F-101 Voo-Doos, love the old Voo-Doo a very good looking airplane
Woow ! :)


DARPA’s Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) program has designed, developed and constructed an entirely new class of ocean-going vessel—one intended to traverse thousands of kilometers over the open seas for months at a time, all without a single crew member aboard
 
Feb 26, 2016
Feb 13, 2016


LOL nobody seemed to care here so I add more news:
Boeing racing clock to deliver 18 KC-46 tankers by next August

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and more :)
Air Force: Boeing Tanker Issue Could Delay Production Decision
An issue that prevented Boeing’s KC-46 tanker from transferring fuel to a US Air Force C-17 during a recent test could delay the start of production of the new aircraft, according to the Air Force.

During a recent test of the tanker’s refueling boom, higher than expected axial loads prevented the transfer of fuel of a C-17 transport plane, service spokesman Daryl Mayer said April 1. The boom, a rigid, telescoping tube that an operator on the tanker extends to and inserts into a receptacle on the receiving aircraft, is used to refuel most Air Force aircraft.

Boeing has a “good understanding” of the problem and is working to identify a fix, Mayer said. However, the Air Force does not yet know the schedule impact to a planned “Milestone C” decision to formally approve production of the new tanker in May, he said.

“We don't yet know the schedule impact to the planned May Milestone C decision, but the problem is well understood and we don't expect an extended delay,” Mayer said.

The KC-46 successfully refueled an Air Force F-16, a much lighter aircraft than the C-17, in a previous test, Mayer noted. The tanker has also successfully transferred fuel to a Navy F/A-18 and Marine Corps Harrier, which use the aircraft’s hose-and-drogue system for refueling, he said.

Boeing spokesman William Barksdale declined to say how much the fix will cost, saying the company is "aggressively working the problem now."

"We expected to find items like this in development test and we are evaluating system changes to improve boom response," Barksdale said April 1. "Over the coming weeks, we will have a better understanding of program impacts, if any. We continue to make steady progress in flight test and aircraft production, and believe we are taking the right steps to fulfill our commitments to the Air Force."

The Air Force is planning to buy 179 KC-46 tankers to recapitalize its aging tanker fleet. Boeing’s KC-46 is unique in its ability to switch between the boom and hose-and-drogue during the same mission, allowing the Air Force to refuel more aircraft more quickly.

Boeing is on tap to deliver 18 full-up KC-46s by August 2017.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Two New Destroyers to be Homeported in San Diego

SAN DIEGO - The Navy announced today the future guided-missile destroyers USS John Finn (DDG 113) and USS Rafael Peralta (DDG 115) are scheduled to be homeported at Naval Base San Diego following their respective commissionings.

Rafael Peralta is expected to arrive in San Diego in fall of 2016 and John Finn will follow in early 2017.

Rafael Peralta is being built by Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine and John Finn is being built by Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) in Pascagoula, Mississippi. Both ships are Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.

The U.S. Navy continually monitors force readiness and ability to provide the most robust, capable maritime force possible. Stationing destroyers in a West Coast port supports the rebalance to the Indo-Asia-Pacific region, placing our most advanced capabilities and greater capacity in that vital theater. By 2020, approximately 60 percent of Navy ships and aircraft will be based in the region.

Guided-missile destroyers are multi-mission surface combatants capable of conducting Anti-Air Warfare (AAW), Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW), and Anti-Surface Warfare (ASUW). The destroyer's armament has greatly expanded the role of the ship in strike warfare utilizing the MK-41 Vertical Launch System (VLS).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
So :)

By 2020, approximately 60 percent of Navy ships and aircraft will be based in the region.
Have begin about 5 years ago and now we are enough close during 1980's it was the opposite
60% with Atlantic Fleet, 2nd/6th Fleet.

Right now

Atlantic Fleet 2nd/6th Fleet
5 CVN
9 CG
28 DDG
4 LHD
10 LPD/LST
6 SSBN
24 SSN/SSGN

66 Combattants + 14 big AA ships

Pacific Fleet 3rd/7th Fleet
5 CVN
13 CG
34 DDG +1 Zumwalt and 1 AB for end of year
4 FF + normaly 4 for end of year
5 LHD/LHA
11 LPD/LST +1 San Antonio for end of year
6 SSBN
34 SSN/SSGN
11 MS

90 Combattants, 58 % + 16 big AA ships

And also important on 32 big Replenishments ships depends MSC 18 in the Pacific
 

Brumby

Major
DARPA selects industry teams for 'Gremlins' UAV project

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has picked four teams for its Gremlins project, which aims to launch volleys of small, low-cost UAVs from bombers, cargo aircraft or possibly even fighter jets and recover them via a Lockheed Martin C-130 transport.

Finely networked for coordinated assaults on well-defended targets, these “gremlins” would conduct a variety of missions like electronic attack or target geolocation, mainly as stand-ins for “conventional, monolithic platforms” such as manned fighter jets or expensive drones.

Last week, DARPA awarded Phase I contracts to Composite Engineering, Dynetics, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, and Lockheed Martin.

The proposals submitted by those competing industry teams “cover a spectrum of technical approaches”, the agency says. The awards begin the first of three programme phases, which could culminate in a proof-of-concept demonstration “of an air-launched, air-recovered, volley-quantity unmanned aircraft system”.

“We’ve assembled a motivated group of researchers and developers that we believe could make significant progress toward Gremlins’ vision of delivering distributed airborne capabilities in a robust, responsive and affordable manner,” says DARPA programme manager Dan Patt. “These teams are exploring different, innovative approaches toward achieving this goal.”

getasset.aspx


DARPA

According to the broad agency announcement for Gremlins, posted in September, candidate launch platforms include the B-52 and B-1 bombers or C-130 turboprop. In-flight recovery is assigned to the C-130.

Each gremlin must fly out 300-500nm (555-926km) at high subsonic speeds after launch and loiter for 1-3h before turning back to the C-130 for recovery, the announcement notes. The flyaway cost per Gremlin air vehicle should not exceed $700,000, and it is designed for at least 20 uses.

Composite Engineering is the unmanned systems division of Kratos, which primarily builds aerial target drones for the US military, one of the largest being the catapult-launched MQM-178 Firejet. Kratos also runs a “confidential UAS programme” that will enter production between 2017 and 2019.

Dynetics develops rocket and satellite technologies, as well as "intelligence, sensor, missile and aviation solutions” for national security missions. It's an industry leader in aerospace R&D.

General Atomics manufacturers mostly large, armed UAVs like the MQ-1C Gray Eagle and MQ-9 Reaper. For several years, it has been expanding its sensors, airborne networking and command, control and communications portfolios, while also developing high-technology products like the high-energy liquid laser area defence system and electromagnetic aircraft launch system.

Lockheed, the world’s largest defence firm and manufacturer of the C-130 and F-35, brings its expertise in land, air, sea and undersea unmanned systems, including the secretive RQ-170, to bear on Gremlins.

DARPA has not announced the cost or timeline associated with Gremlins, but $15 million is allocated for the current fiscal year and another $31 million has been requested for 2017. Preliminary design reviews are expected in 2017, agency budget documents state.
 
any opinions?
Extracted%20Still%201-cropped.jpg

Army Ground-Launched Hellfire Missiles Attacks Drone Target
An emerging Army weapons system attacked an approaching enemy drone target in a live-fire test at White Sands Missile Range, N.M.

The U.S. Army attacked a flying drone target with a Hellfire missile fired from a truck-mounted launcher designed to protect ground troops from enemy rockets, mortars, artillery fire, cruise missiles and aircraft, service officials explained.

The live-fire test, which took place at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., a Multi-Mission Launcher (MML) shot the Hellfire out of one of 15 rotating launch tubes mounted onto a mobile tactical truck.

“The MML is mounted on a medium tactical vehicle. The launcher can rotate 360 degrees and elevate from 0 to 90 degrees. It consists of fifteen tubes, each of which can hold either a single large interceptor or multiple smaller interceptors,” an Army statement said.

With ISIS rocket fire killing a U.S. Marine at a firebase in Iraq recently, this emerging ground-based troop protection is the kind of system which could quickly make and operational difference for forces in combat situations.

The firing represents an adaptation of the Hellfire missile, a 100-pound tank-killing weapons typically fired from aircraft such as Gray Eagle, Predator and Reaper drones and Apache attack helicopters, among others.

The Hellfire was fired as part of a development force protection technology called “Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC Inc. 2-I).” The live fire exercise demonstrated the ability to fire a second interceptor type because the Multi-Mission launcher has also fired a ground-launched Stinger anti-aircraft missile and a AIM-9X missile, an air-to-air attack weapon adapted for ground-fire troop protection.

“We are fully integrated with AIM-9X and Longbow (Hellfire). This is a monumental effort by our PEO family,” Col. Terrence Howard, Project Manager, Cruise Missile Defense Systems Project Office, PEO Missiles and Space told Scout Warrior.

The Multi-Mission launcher works in tandem with radar and fire-control software to identify, track, pinpoint and destroy approaching enemy air threats with an interceptor missile.

IFPC Inc 2-I is a joint collaborative effort between the Army's Program Executive Office for Missiles and Space's Cruise Missile Defense Systems Project Office and the Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center, an Army statement said.

"This is a capability that, when fully matured and fielded, will match and counter a very wide variety of sophisticated airborne threats. MML will greatly help protect our ground troops from harm's way under the most stressing battlespace operating conditions,” James Lackey, Director of AMRDEC, told Scout Warrior in a statement.

The IFPC Inc 2-I System will use a technology called Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System for its command and control along with a Sentinel radar system to provide 360-degree protection with the ability to engage simultaneous threats arriving from different angles of attack, Army officials said.

“MML (Multi-Mission Launcher) gives me confidence we can do more of these types of efforts when it comes to future prototyping,” Lackey added.

The live-fire demonstration involved Army subject matter experts, industry participants and international partners interested in the systems’ development.

“This is a marked achievement that proves the open systems architecture of the IFPC capability works as designed. We have demonstrated the ability to offer a multiple interceptor solution to defeat multiple threats. True multi-mission capability" Lt. Col. Michael Fitzgerald, IFPC Product Manager.

Weapons development experts are now using telemetry and data collection systems to assess the results of the live fire with a mind to quickly preparing the system for combat use. The weapon should be ready for combat within three to five years.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top