US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

[Jura The idiot]

Do we know what it successfully engaged

I think it was one

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

launched from

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(I figured it from an article which contains so egregious mistakes that I decided not to link it

and the terms of reference of the test to conclude that it is representative of success?

we don't Need To Know LOL

 

[Jura The idiot]

interesting:
U.S. Navy Considering Adding Anti-Ship Missiles Back to Submarine Force

The Navy is investigating adding an anti-ship missile to its submarine force — bringing it inline with the majority of the world naval submarines, the director of Naval Reactors said on Wednesday.

In response to a question from the audience at the 2015 Naval Submarine League Symposium, Adm. Frank Caldwell said the Navy was exploring adding the capability to the fleet.

“For this audience, I’ll tell you we are considering that and we are taking some some steps to delivering that kind of capability to our submarine force and I can’t really say anymore than that,” he said.

The U.S. submarine fleet did use the UGM-84A Harpoon anti-ship missile but that Harpoon variant was retired in 1997. The current primary attack submarines is the anti-ship weapon is Mk 48 heavy torpedo and is limited in its range relative to anti-ship missiles developed and deployed with foreign navies.

In particular, Russian and Chinese submarines field a variety of anti-ship missiles with ranges that far exceed the Mk-48s.

For example, the emerging Chinese YJ-18 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile, capable of launching from a People Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) attack boat has an estimated range in excess of 300 miles. Likewise, Russia’s newer Oscar-class attack boats field the supersonic P-700 Granit — known by NATO as the SS-N-19 Shipwreck — with a more than 300-mile range.

For the U.S. submarine fleet it makes sense to return anti-ship missiles to boats to provide a greater standoff range for the force, Eric Wertheim — naval analyst and author of

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

— told USNI News on Wednesday.

“When you look at potential combat operations and you can see how an anti-ship missile from a sub could prove useful,” Wertheim said.
“I do think it would add options to today’s submarine fleet to operate farther from high threat environments. Standoff capability adds a lot of options for military commanders.”

If the U.S. elects to include anti-ship missiles in its submarines there are several options to chose from beyond the legacy Harpoons.

The Norwegian company Kongsberg — that recently partnered with Raytheon — unveiled a subsurface launched version of its Naval Strike Missile in 2014. Lockheed Martin’s Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) being developed for DARPA is currently air launched, but Lockheed has examined firing the missile from a surface ship and it could likely be adapted for submarine use.

Additionally, U.S. attack submarines all field Raytheon Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAM). Earlier this year, Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) tested a Block IV TLAM as an anti-ship missile.

“If you have Tomahawks already onboard then it could be dual purpose [land attack or anti-ship],” Wertheim said.

Studying a sub-launched ASM conforms to an overall trend in the Navy in the last few years to empathize high-end warfare after years of supporting the low intensity conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

source:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Jura The idiot]

Do we know what it successfully engaged and the terms of reference of the test to conclude that it is representative of success?

two related, recent items:

2. article
   Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
   
   Lockheed Martin: 9-Country Missile Defense Demonstration to Inform Future Aegis Upgrades

 

[navyreco]

Textron Systems Unveiled its Advanced Amphibious Craft for US Army MSV(L) and US Navy SC(X)R

AUSA 2015 (Association of the US Army annual convention) may be an army event (which our affiliate website Army Recognition was covering) an eminently naval product was showcased for the first time, at the Textron Systems booth: The Advanced Amphibious Craft.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[TerraN_EmpirE]

Still Wish it had a Active protection system like Trophy

should fit M320 or the FN Mk13 mod 0 Scar GL. would also fit those of a number of US Allies under barrel Grenade launchers like the British AG36 based, Canadian E.A.G.L.E, Australian SL90, German AG36, Israeli the new GL that fits the Tavor. because of it's length it will not fith the M203 And I suspect that the Milkor multi shot is out to. Should fit the old M79 though.
Return of the M8

Again wish it had Trophy.

 

[SteelBird]

Guys, this afternoon (Oct 23, 2015 16:00 local time) I passed by the Phnom Penh International Airport and saw a U.S Air-Force C-17. It was moving and about to take off. Because I was driving that I couldn't take a picture. I search for the news and couldn't find anything. Do you have any idea? What kind of mission was it?

 

[asif iqbal]

Also note currently by end of 2015 there is 33 BMD warships

By 2020 this number will be 48

Splits as follows

27 for CVN escorts
4 for Spain based in Rota
11 for Pacific and Japan

That's 48 BMD by 2020 but that means 39 that are deployable


JMSDF has 6 x BMD warships soon adding 2 more to have 8, JMSDF has conducted 4 BMD exo-atmosphere tests 3 of them were successful

In total there has been a total of 33 exo atmosphere BMD tests of which were 27 successful or 81%

There has been 5 endo atmosphere tests all successful

Total tests is therefore 38 of which 32 are successful or 84%

In 2008 a satellite was also shot down off Hawaii so including that 39 tests 33 successful or 85%

 

[Bernard]

Still Wish it had a Active protection system like Trophy

Is there a reason the United States doesn't use protection systems like Trophy for our Tanks? Maybe their warfare studies show it isn't useful? Maybe the systems and wiring and all of it is to heavy on an already heavy Tank. I mean Russia's new T-14 Armata has Trophy like system all over it.

 

[Jeff Head]

More details on all that is included in the Saudi Arabia Frigate Deal:

In addition to the ships themselves, the $11.25 billion deal includes:

• Four (4) MMSC ships (a derivative of the Freedom Variant of the U.S. Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Class) that incorporate five (5) COMBATSS-21 Combat Management Systems (four (4) installed, one (1) spare) with five (5) TRS-4D Radars (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)
• Five (5) Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) (Mode 4- and Mode 5-capable) UPX-29 (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)
• Five (5) Compact Low Frequency Active Passive Variable Depth Sonar (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)
• Eight (8) MK-41 Vertical Launch Systems (VLS) (two (2) eight-cell assemblies per ship for 16 cells per hull)
• Five-hundred thirty-two (532) tactical RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) (one hundred twenty-eight (128) installed, twenty (20) test and training rounds, three hundred eighty-four (384) spares)
• Five (5) AN/SWG-l (V) Harpoon Ship Command Launch Control Systems (four (4) installed (one (1) per ship), one (1) spare)
• Eight (8) Harpoon Shipboard Launchers (two (2) installed four-tube assemblies per ship)
• Forty-eight (48) RGM-84 Harpoon Block II Missiles (thirty-two (32) installed, sixteen (16) test and training rounds)
• Five (5) MK-15 Mod 31 SeaRAM Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)
• One-hundred eighty-eight (188) RIM 116C Block II Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM) (forty-four (44) installed, twelve (12) test and training rounds, one hundred thirty-two (132) spares)
• Five (5) MK-75 76mm OTO Melara Gun Systems (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)
• Forty-eight (48) 50-caliber machine guns (forty (40) installed (ten (10) per ship), eight (8) spares); ordnance; and Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM) Global Positioning System/Precise Positioning Service (GPS/PPS) navigation equipment

Also included in this sale in support of the MMSC are:

- Study, design and construction of operations;
- Support and training facilities;
- Spare and repair parts;
- Support and test equipment;
- Communications equipment employing Link 16 equipment;
- Fire Control System/Ceros 200 Sensor and Illuminator;
- 20mm Narwhal Gun;
- Nixie AN/SLQ-25A Surface Ship Torpedo Defense System;
- MK-32 Surface Vessel Torpedo Tubes;
- WBR-2000 Electronic Support Measure and Threat Warning System;
- Automatic Launch of Expendables (ALEX) Chaff and Decoy-Launching System;
- ARC-210 Radios; Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System
- Automated Digital Network System;
- Personnel training and training equipment;
- U.S. Government and contractor engineering,
- Technical and logistics support services
- U.S. Government and contractor engineering,
- Technical and logistics support.

Very comprehensive package for these vessels.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Jeff Head]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

​

PASCAGOULA, Miss. (NNS) -- The keel of the future USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) was authenticated during a ceremony at the Huntington Ingalls Industries shipyard Oct. 20.

The ship's keel was authenticated by its namesake, the Honorable Paul Ignatius and Mr. Bill Jones, the Hull Superintendent. Both authenticators etched their initials into the keel plate to symbolically recognize the joining of modular components and the ceremonial beginning of the ship.

"We are very honored that the namesake of DDG 117, The Honorable Paul Ignatius, is able to witness this milestone ceremony," said Capt. Mark Vandroff, DDG 51 class program manager, Program Executive Office (PEO) Ships. "Laying the keel breathes life into a ship and is the first major event in a shipbuilding program."

During World War II, Paul Ignatius served as a commissioned lieutenant in the Navy. Ignatius continued his service as Secretary of the Navy from 1967-1969 and later as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Logistics during the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. The future USS Paul Ignatius is the 67th ship of the Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) class and the first ship to bear his name.

Paul Ignatius, a Flight IIA ship, is the first ship in the FY2013-FY2017 multi-year procurement contract to start fabrication and is scheduled to deliver in 2018.

Upon joining the Fleet as the 67th DDG 51 class ship, she will serve as an integral player in global maritime security, engaging in air, undersea, surface, strike and ballistic missile defense.

As one of the Defense Department's largest acquisition organizations, PEO Ships is responsible for executing the development and procurement of all destroyers, amphibious ships, special mission and support ships, and special warfare craft. Currently, the majority of shipbuilding programs managed by PEO Ships are benefiting from serial production efficiencies, which are critical to delivering ships on cost and schedule.

She will be the 67th Burke class DDG. The vessels are being built at two locations, Bath Iron Works in Main, and at Huntington Ingalls in Pascagoula, Mississippi.