US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
It is clear that the US House of Representatives (who have the purse strings for the military) and the US Senate (who provide oversight) are not going to allow the A-10 to be retired.

They have their own military experts and quite a few members on the various committees served themselves. These people check into the claims being made about the A-10 and the "dire predictions" regarding the F-35 if the A-10s are not retired and they are finding them to simply not be true.

I think this is pretty much put to rest now...just like it was last time this was attempted.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



JU2Tm96.jpg

US Naval institute News said:
Congress has received notification of a potential $3 billon sale of 17 Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and support equipment to Japan,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

In its statement, DSCA (pronounced dis-kah) said the potential sale would expand the ability of the Japanese Self Defense Forces (JSDF) to operate more closely with the U.S. and extend the range of their ground forces.

“Japan is modernizing its transport fleet to better support its defense and special mission needs. The proposed sale of V-22B Block C Osprey aircraft will greatly enhance the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force’s humanitarian and disaster relief capabilities and support amphibious operations,” read the DSCA statement.

“This sale will promote burden sharing with our ally and interoperability with U.S. forces. Japan will have no difficulty absorbing these aircraft into its armed forces.”

The agency notified Congress of the possible sale on Tuesday.

In addition to the Osprey’s the deal’s outline would also include night vision goggles, a variety of radars, spare parts and training equipment.

Japan has been considering the buy at least since 2013 with 17 Osprey’s planned for as part of the country’s five-year mid-term defense program update as part of an emerging amphibious capability modeled on the U.S. Marine Corps, according to a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Ospreys are key to the U.S Marine Corps posture in Western Pacific thanks tho their ability to fly further and faster than traditional helicopters and still land on a variety of ships.

For it’s part,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the first of two Izumo-class large helicopter carriers that would make ideal launching platforms for the V-22s. U.S. Marines have also successfully tested V-22s on the onboard Japan’s Hyuga-class DDHs in 2013.

The announcement of the potential sale follows closely with a revision of U.S.-Japan guidelines that allow Japan and the U.S. closer operations.

Unlike domestic defense programs, U.S. foreign military sales undergo a much more circuitous acquisition process.

Congress now has the option to approve the concept of the sale and Japan has to agree to the terms before companies can agree to final terms and delivery dates, according a State Department official told USNI News on Tuesday.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Well with the Russians Showing off new Tanks the US and NATO may now be under the pressure to update there armor.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Abrams Upgrade Plan

Engineering Change Proposal 1a

ECP-1a will address the system architecture (power and data management systems) to support inbound technology, specifically the Army's network requirements. It is scheduled to begin production in fiscal year 2017.
Improvements include network compatibility, mass memory upgrade, power generation and distribution. Upgrades to the tank's electronic architecture and power distribution system enable integration of the Army's future battle command and communication systems. Protection improvements include armor upgrade and integration of counter radio-controlled IED electronic jammers. A new auxiliary power unit and advanced on-board diagnostics will improve sustainability by reducing the fuel usage and the cost of spare parts.
Engineering Change Proposal 1b
ECP 1b is scheduled to begin development in fiscal year 2016 and enter production in 2024. This upgrade will improve the tank's lethality through enhancements in sights and sensors that are centered on the integration of the next generation of forward looking infrared (FLIR) technology, a color camera and a laser range finder.
I really feel Abrams would benefit form a APS like Trophy. In fact I would push for a Common APS family across the Army and Marines for Tanks, IFV's and APCs even JLTV down the line.
Bradley Upgrade Plan

Engineering Change Proposal 1ECP 1 focuses on mobility and survivability, increases movement and restores lost ground clearance. A production contract award was made in 2014 and fielding will begin in the third quarter of fiscal year 2015.

Engineering Change Proposal 2
ECP 2 addresses embedded digital systems. A later effort will focus on integration of technologies currently in development: Mounted Family of Computing Systems, Net-Ready, Integrate Counter Remote-Controlled Improvised Explosive Device Electronic Warfare (CREW) Duke v3 and Vehicle Health Management System. ECP 2 consists of a power pack upgrade to enable enough power to run the current approved counter IED and mission command components. ECP 2 production award is scheduled for fiscal year 2017 with fielding beginning in 2018.

Engineering Change Proposal 2b

ECP 2B is about lethality, and parallels the Abrams ECP1b program. They are being developed together to take advantage of as much commonality as possible. The Bradley ECP2b program includes the Improved Bradley Acquisition System and the Commander Independent Viewer with 3Gen FLIR, a color camera and a laser pointer that works at standoff distance.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Now this is the surface component of a modern US Navy Carrier Strike Group.

On May 2nd, 2015, U.S. Navy ships underway as part the John C. Stennis, CVN-74, Carrier Strike Group. These exercises provide an opportunity for crews to focus on teamwork, communication, and hone skills sailors need when executing the nation's maritime strategy.


2015-USN-CSG-01.jpg

2015-USN-CSG-02.jpg

2015-USN-CSG-03.jpg

What you see here are the John Stennis, a Ticonderoga AEGIS cruiser, four Burke AEGIS destroyers (Two Flight IIAs with the hangers, and two Flight I or IIs without the hanger), and a Freedom Class LCS...I am sure to help perform ASW duties.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Army, Marines face new pressure to use same ammunition
By James K. Sanborn, Staff writer4:22 p.m. EDT May 4, 2015
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
13COMMENTEMAILMORE
The Army and Marine Corps will conduct comprehensive testing this year to determine the viability of adopting common rifle ammunition, a potential cost-cutting initiative that could have serious implications for troops on the battlefield.

Members of Congress are driving the efforts, saying the switch to a single 5.56mm cartridge for all conventional U.S. forces stands to save American taxpayers considerable expense. It is likely to prompt a showdown between the two rounds favored by each service, raising the possibility the Marine Corps could be forced to adopt ammunition it rejected in 2009 because its early development was plagued by problems.

On capitol Hill, the House Armed Services' Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces has ordered Defense Secretary Ashton Carter to study the issue and report to Congress by next March whether it still makes sense for the Army to use its M855A1 round while the Marine Corps moves to make the M318 Mod 0 Special Operations Science and Technology round its new standard.

"The Army and Marine Corps are using a very similar enhanced small caliber 5.56 rounds for the same operational environment," subcommittee chairman Rep. Mike Turner, a Republican from Ohio, told Marine Corps Times April 29. "We want to ensure our warfighters are provided with the best equipment available and ensure maximum value to the taxpayer."

The subcommittee's ranking Democrat, Rep. Loretta Sanchez of California, has indicated she also supported the potential shift.

Concerns with the Army's round

Marine Corps officials say they do not oppose the idea, provided the Army has fixed its round's propensity to wreak havoc by causing excessive wear on a weapon's inner workings.

The problem stemmed from the M855A1's high chamber pressure and exposed steel tip, which could chew up a weapon's feed-ramp, erode barrels and crack bolts, said Col. Michael Manning, the program manager for Infantry Weapons Systems at Marine Corps Systems Command in Quantico, Virginia. The Marine Corps believes SOST is superior "at this time," he added, "but we are always open to testing and are participating in ongoing testing of the M855A1. We will always adopt whatever is best for the service."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

At the same time, the Army was developing its M855A1, also known as a green round because it does not contain lead. But developers encountered significant problems, prompting the Marine Corps to continue pursuing its own program.

Marines saw an immediate benefit when the SOST round was fielded in Afghanistan in 2010. The institution has continued to be impressed, so much so that this past winter the Marine Corps' foremost weapons experts announced their objective to see SOST adopted as the service's standard rifle round.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Advocated by Weapons Training Battalion, which also is based in Quantico, the SOST recommendation is sound and will receive just consideration, Manning said. However, a decision cannot be made until the next round of M855A1 testing is complete, he said. The service will then have to argue their case to the defense secretary to justify SOST if Marines still find M855A1 lacking and the secretary's report to Congress is followed by movement to adopt the Army's round.

Training vs. equipment

One of the world's premier small-arms experts says the debate over performance is irrelevant. The accuracy provided by both cartridges is more than sufficient for a conventional infantry force, said Larry Vickers, a retired Army Master Sergeant who served 15 years in 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment – Delta and designed the Marine Corps' Vickers's Combat Applications two-point sling.

"If you've got ammo that shoots 2 MOA, that is eight inches at 400 meters. That is still easily the upper chest area of a bad guy," he said, referencing the acronym for minute-of-angle with each minute translating into an inch from a rifle's a point of aim at 100 yards. "Accuracy of the ammunition is not the issue. It's the guy behind the gun."

The Army touts its M855A1 ammunition as match grade meaning it is as accurate as cartridges that would be used in a high-level marksmanship competition. However, some have voiced reservations about its consistent accuracy. Independent testing by staff at the National Rifle Association's American Rifleman magazine found in 2012 that, while it was more accurate than old M855, it was not within 1 MOA, the standard many would consider match grade.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

For highly trained units in special operations, match-grade or specialty ammunition can be beneficial and will continue to be available, Vickers said. It might not yield as much benefit, however, is a regular soldier or Marine is not trained to the same exacting standard.

He supports the idea of returning to a single standard round, particularly if it will save money.

"I am really against this trend we have seen over the years of different uniforms for different services where everybody has to be unique and special," he said, alluding to another potential cost-savings target military leaders have resisted.

The money to procure separate high-end cartridges would be better spent on teaching troops to shoot better, he said.

"Tackle some training deficiencies first. Go out and issue M193 ball to Delta and they will hand anyone their ass on a platter because they are bringing training and technology together," Vickers said, noting the round U.S. forces used before the M855. "You can't bypass the first step. You need guys who can hit targets in a variety of situations under stress, bringing the skill to the table that warrants that ammo," he said.

To that point, the Marine Corps is working to revamp marksmanship training by pushing more combat marksmanship into its early training. This will force Marines to perfect their ability to shoot while on the move and hone skills such as shot placement on a photo-realistic target, positive identification and making decisions to shoot, or not.

Nitpicking ammunition, Vickers said, is like trying "to fix a software problem with a hardware solution."

"The US military as a whole -- their theory is not to put in time and effort to build better skill, but to try to buy better effectiveness and hits on target," he said. "It is very misguided."
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Source: Army sets dates for new camo rollout
By Kyle Jahner, Staff writer1:29 p.m. EDT May 5, 2015
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
28COMMENTEMAILMORE
The Army expects combat uniforms made of the new Operational Camouflage Pattern to start hitting store shelves on July 1, an Army official has confirmed.

New coyote brown boots to complement the new uniform won't be available until August, the source said.

New recruits should start receiving them in their clothing bags by January, according to the source, who has knowledge of the roll-out but requested anonymity.

Army public affairs declined to discuss the roll-out plan at this time.

Army Times' source said the target wear-out date of old ACUs made of the unpopular Universal Camouflage Pattern, has been set for October 2018. That means, until then, soldiers in garrison could see a mix of uniforms including MultiCam, which has been issued to soldiers deploying to Afghanistan since 2010 and more recently to those in Iraq.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(boots, T-shirt, belt) can be worn with old uniforms or vice versa.

In early April, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that OCP would be available in late summer or early fall, and would be issued in clothing bags soon after.

Both MultiCam, and OCP feature a more traditional (non-digital) camo pattern of muted greens, light beige and dark brown.

The Army had said there would be desert and jungle variants of OCP, but this far there have been no details or imagery of potential variants.

The new ACUs are expected to have
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as well:



  • The internal knee and elbow pads will be gone.


  • The upper-sleeve pocket will be an inch longer and zippered instead of Velcro.


  • The cargo pocket will lose its cord-and-barrel lock.


  • And the lower leg pocket flap will have a button rather than Velcro.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

not sure about removing the pads also the neck will no longer close
Army Training Network now accessible on phones, tablets
By Michelle Tan, Staff writer5:47 p.m. EDT May 5, 2015
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
3COMMENTEMAILMORE
Soldiers can now use smartphones and tablets to access the Army Training Network, the service's primary website for training information and resources.

Previously, soldiers had to use their Common Access Card and a computer to log on to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, according to officials from Combined Arms Center-Training.

The change was directed by Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno, who directed that a username and password combination be the Army's single point of entry for all things training to ensure all soldiers had easy access to authoritative training information, according to CAC-Training.

"This is a big step forward for the Army," said Col. Thomas Trossen, director of the Training Management Directorate, in a statement. "As we create more apps and web sites for training and training management, we must include the soldier and unit-level training managers at the operational point of need."

Soldiers using the Army Training Network can sign up for a username and password from the website's home page. The username and password is then created through the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, according to CAC-Training.

Once they have a username and password, soldiers can log on to the Army Training Network using any device that has an Internet connection. Soldiers will still have to use their CAC and a laptop to access information that is categorized as "For Official Use Only," according to CAC-Training.

"Some 93 percent of the information on ATN will be accessible with an Internet connection, username and password," said Charlie Ostrand, the technical branch chief for the Army Training Management System, in a statement. "Units in the field can have online access, and commanders will not have to carry stacks of training documents."

The Army Training Network gives soldiers access to a variety of training resources, including Unit Training Management, NCO Corner, and leader development materials. The site also has links to resources on how to conduct training meetings, event rehearsals, after action reviews and other topics.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
US Army is developing 'invisibility suit' for soldiers to make them DISAPPEAR on the battlefield - and says it will begin trials in just 18 months
  • Hoped suit will work in every terrain, and in every temperature
  • chameleon-like system would continuously update the colour and pattern
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


PUBLISHED: 14:56 EST, 7 May 2015 | UPDATED: 16:00 EST, 7 May 2015

The US Army is developing an invisibility suits for its soldiers.

It has requested firms developing 'stealth fabrics' to get in touch - and is hoping to test the first prototypes within 18 months.

It is hoped the suit will work in every terrain, from deserts to jungles - and in every temperature.

191476E6000005DC-0-image-a-4_1431026314739.jpg



+5
Can you see me? The US Army has called for firms developing stealth technology to work on an 'invisibility suit' for soldiers that can be used anywhere in the world.

The US army's call for proposals from companies calls for wearable camouflage with a chameleon-like ability to change according to the background.

'A chameleon-like or adaptive camouflage system would continuously update the colour and pattern, concealing the Soldier in the current environment.'

It calls for firms to 'Develop an innovative adaptive camouflage technology that can be used by individual soldiers in various land environments. A non-powered solution is preferred.'

Contractors will demonstrate the feasibility of their approach in the first six months of the programme.

Those selected for the following one-year phase will submit 10 prototype uniforms for testing.

These need to work in all terrain from all angles.

They also need to function across a wide range of temperatures, in rain and snow, and without hampering a soldier's normal duties.

If the adaptive camouflage requires a power source, this must weigh no more than 0.45 kilograms and provide at least 8 hours of operation.

WHAT THE ARMY WANTS
Has 360-degree coverage and 'can actively respond to various land environments under changing light conditions.'

Can be integrated with soldier's equipment.

Ideally, will not require a power supply. If it does require a power supply, it 'should last a minimum of four hours and weigh no more than two pounds' including batteries and connections.

Reflects infrared light the same way as other army uniforms

Works in a range of terrain, including desert, forest, urban areas, jungle, and mountains.

Works below freezing and at temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit, in high wind, in stormy weather, and in smoke, dust, or fog

It is believed two options are under consideration.

In 2006, John Pendry, a theoretical physicist at Imperial College London, showed that it should be possible to bend light around an object and hide it using metamaterials – which channel electromagnetic waves.

However, many only work in the lab with specific wavelengths or from certain angles.

Work with TV-like LEDs were hampered by power and computing requirements.

But although they can bend light, metamaterials cannot make things disappear completely.

286CD3FF00000578-0-image-a-10_1431027665952.jpg



+5
Guy Cramer, CEO of Canadian camouflage makers Hyperstealth Biotechnology, says he demonstrated metamaterial camouflage to US military scientists last year,

286CD41500000578-0-image-m-24_1431028108197.jpg



+5
286CD40B00000578-0-image-a-25_1431028138696.jpg



+5

Hyperstealth Biotechnology won't yet reveal details or release photographs of the material.


Despite this, some firms claim they already have working products.

Guy Cramer, CEO of Canadian camouflage makers Hyperstealth Biotechnology, says he demonstrated metamaterial camouflage to US military scientists last year, and that the new project will allow him to move forward with it.

But Cramer won't yet reveal details or release photographs of the material.

'What's the holdup on our Quantum Stealth (Light Bending material)?' the firm wrote.

'The U.S. military needed to put in place the requirement, without that requirement we were not allowed to work with them.

0F28FD8700000578-0-The_wearer_would_be_effectively_transparent_at_some_wavelengths_-m-6_1431027065312.jpg



+5
The wearer would be effectively transparent at some wavelengths but not all, rendering them as a coloured shadow or ghost image

'Key people in the U.S. Military had assumed bending light across the Ultraviolet, Visible and Infrared spectrum was impossible until Hyperstealth recently demonstrated that and more to those people.

'This requirement for light weight, passive (non-powered) adaptive camouflage has now been issued.



Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Follow us:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
|
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
US Navy Cyclone class Patrol boats operating in the Pesian Gulf. Along with the destroyers, these vessels will be tasked with watching over commerical vessels in the gulf.


web_150317-N-SF508-627.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


U.S. 5TH FLEET AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (March 17, 2014) The Cyclone-class coastal patrol ship USS Hurricane (PC 3) leads other coastal patrol ships assigned to Patrol Coastal Squadron 1 (PCRON 1) in formation during a exercise supporting maritime security operations in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

These ships are heavily aremd to combat small craft and speed boats (among other things) with:

2 × MK 38 25 mm autocannon
5 × .50 caliber machine guns
2 × MK 19 40 mm automatic grenade launchers
2 × M240B machine guns
6 × FIM-92 Stinger SAMs
2 × 4 MK-60 BGM-176B Griffin B missile launchers
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Whatever else may be said of them, it is good to see the LCS out there exercising with the big boys. These vessels are frigates, and with the principle task forces, that is what they will be used for. Time to arm them accordingly.

LCS-RAS.jpg
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WATERS TO THE WEST OF THE KOREAN PENINSULA The littoral combat ship USS Fort Worth (LCS 3), left, and the guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain (DDG 56) conduct a replenishment-at-sea from the Military Sealift Command fleet replenishment oiler USNS Pecos (T-AO 197) during exercise Foal Eagle 2015. Foal Eagle is a series of annual training events that are defense-oriented and designed to increase readiness and maintain stability on the Korean Peninsula while strengthening the Republic of Korea-U.S. alliance and promoting regional peace and stability of the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
U.S. Air Force Kills Key Space Control Program
USAF abandons key defensive counterspace project, with no public plans to continue the mission
May 7, 2015
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
| Aviation Week & Space Technology

Raidrs Raided



The U.S. Air Force is terminating one of its flagship defensive counterspace programs—one designed to identify sources of satellite communications interference—due to “cost and performance” issues.

Ending the Rapid Attack Identification Detection Reporting System (Raidrs) comes as Air Force officials have taken their most public and vocal stand in years in favor of improved space control projects, including a $5 billion addition to the fiscal 2016-20 budget request and an uncharacteristically open interview by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
chief Gen. John Hyten on the U.S. television program 60 Minutes in April.

Raidrs, a collection of ground-based monitoring antennas, was one of three acknowledged defensive counterspace projects created more than a decade ago. It was designed to ensure that military operators—especially those supporting war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan— had nonstop service from military and commercial satellites providing crucial communications. At the time, roughly 80% of the satellite communications for forces there was provided by commercial systems. As demand for using satcom has grown so have instances of interference—friendly and hostile.

And just as soon as it was fielded, the Air Force pulled the plug.

Though military satellite systems have inherent encryption and/or protection, commercial systems are more susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI). In some cases, interference is simple: An adversary can easily overwhelm energy in a particular portion of the spectrum to deny access for users. Or an allied user can accidently emit on the wrong frequency or with too much power.

Terminating Raidrs does not necessarily suggest an end to the program’s capabilities, however, as industry sources suggest military and commercial providers have learned how better to detect friendly and hostile interference with satellite communications. Military officials have been coy about just what programs could move forward to meet this requirement, suggesting there could be much work being finished in secret.

“The Raidrs mission will be accomplished through the remaining defensive counterspace family of systems,” says an Air Force Space Command spokesman, Tech. Sgt. Michael Slater. He adds a list of these capabilities, including the Standard Process for Interface Recognition and Interference Targeting, Raidrs Deployable Ground System Block 0, “Bounty Hunter and Blackjack.” Command officials declined to explain these systems despite repeated requests. Slater says the Air Force spent about $214 million on Raidrs; it is unclear whether this includes the cost of establishing protected sites globally for its antennas.

Events, however, overtook Raidrs technology. Slow progress in procuring the system and developing tactics since its prototype fielding in 2005 was outpaced by work in the commercial world, says one space control expert. Commercial satcom providers such as SES and Intelsat are typically required to be able to pinpoint where EMI is located to fulfill their customer contracts. They have made advances in locating EMI, though they are not necessarily equipped to address it if found in a foreign country.

The final vestiges of Raidrs will be shuttered in September; it has been a long time coming. The then-Air Force Space Command chief, Gen. William Shelton, proposed the termination May 13, 2014; the program executive officer signed the order a month later. Slater says the termination was a result, at least in part, of performance issues. The Raidrs Block 10 system fell short in operational testing and relied upon an unsupported operating system, he said. “The cost to upgrade to a newer operating system and to implement technical solutions to meet performance criteria was more than [Space Command] budgets would allow,” Slater explained.

Shelton’s recommendation came only two years after the objective system was fielded. Maj. Gen. Roger Teague, now director of space procurements for the Air Force secretary, said in April 2012 when he was a one-star general overseeing strategy for Space Command, that fielding Raidrs was one of the command’s successes for 2012. Last month, Teague said he was unable to address what capabilities would be lost with the Raidrs termination or those that could endure, indicating security constraints.

Raidrs began in 2005 with a development contract for the system; Integral Systems of Lanham, Maryland, won the work. The company is now owned by Kratos Defense and Security Solutions. What began in July 2005 as a prototype slated for 120 days of operations in the Middle East has been used there ever since. The prototype was capable of monitoring roughly 500 signals at once. Air Force officials have provided few details on the program over the past decade.

However, during an interview with Aviation Week in 2007, the commander of the 16th Space Control Sqdn., which operated Raidrs, provided a peek into its capabilities (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Each Raidrs site was envisioned to consist of six, 2.4 meter (7.87-ft.) antennas to monitor signals. Another 3.7-meter dish was used to characterize interference using a powerful system called “Blackbird” that acts like a spectrum analyzer. And two more 4.5-meter antennas are used to identify a footprint of space where the jammer is located.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



The operational concept called for identifying the location of the interference and then relying on military forces or diplomatic measures to address hostile jamming activity. Raidrs was designed to alert operators to anomalies in signals in the C, Ku, X and UHF frequencies; the program was envisioned before the explosion of interest in Kacommunications.

The recommendation to terminate Raidrs came just over a year after officials broke ground at a $14.3 million central operating location at Peterson AFB, Colorado. Five transportable ground segments were planned for Lualualei Naval Station, Hawaii; Cape Canaveral AFS, Florida; Misawa AB, Japan; Kapaun AB, Germany; and a classified location in Central Command. This footprint was designed to provide near-global coverage in key areas such as the Middle East, North America and Pacific.

Other Raidrs blocks were envisioned. One, outlined in 2011 by Michael Hamel, then the three-star commander of the U.S. Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center, was to help counter antisatellite missiles and other threats such as lasers. This concept gained steam after China’s 2007 demonstration of a developmental antisatellite interceptor to down its own aging weather satellite, a gutsy display of a capability tested by the U.S. 22 years earlier.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
officials were prompted to place more priority on some space control efforts. Industry sources suggest this Raidrs block, which was never realized, likely will be satisfied by another program, which is probably classified.

With this block, satellite operators were pursuing a concept of “every satellite a sensor,” says one industry source. The command could more closely monitor each satellite’s telemetry to craft a baseline. Once crafted, software could alert operators to any anomaly. For example, if an imaging satellite experiences an unexpected temperature change routinely in its orbital path, this could indicate attack by a laser employed in that location, a capability long under development in Russia and, possibly, China.

“Ultimately, in the event of attempted jamming against our assets, we will leverage the full range of cross-domain capabilities to fight through that threat,” says Capt. Nicholas Mercurio, spokesman for 14th Air Force. It includes the Joint Space Operations Center (Jspoc), where operators took action based on Raidrs data. His comments echo those of Hyten during recent public appearances, though the rhetoric is backed by few specifics. 14th Air Force officials declined to say what capability was lost with the termination of Raidrs and what other capabilities may be developed or fielded to continue the mission.

Mercurio points to a new Commercial Integration Cell (CIC) in the Jspoc as a measure to ensure the military is “working better to mitigate EMI” with commercial operators. The CIC will begin a six-month trial operation in July (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Manned by commercial operators, the CIC will allow them to better share data on satellite health and operators in real time, a capability that is currently lacking. “The pilot program will research and develop the technical and legal aspects of public and private partnerships leveraging mutual capabilities and information sets to enhance” the mission, Slater says.

One question to be addressed: To what extent should the Pentagon protect those commercial assets on which it relies for operations.
 
Top