No other opposing nation will ever follow another nation's ADIZ guidelines.
But there has to be some sort of real-world effect of the zone. Otherwise, what's the point?
EDIT: I've just read Jeff's post above. I sort of understand the concept of showing other countries you're keeping an eye on aircraft moving through an area, but I'm not sure that declaring the zone has been a net positive for China.
furthermore given the vast majority of civil airlines are giving china their flight plans they clearly acknowledge the ADIZ too
It depends which ones you're talking about, but generally airlines are going to do anything to avoid trouble. They're businesses, they're not there to get involved in political disputes. I'm sure they usually file plans whenever a country asks them to do so.
I have a feeling China is more interested in military aircraft entering the zone.
Japan has even asked china to roll back their ADIZ
Well, yes, because they see it (rightly or wrongly) as a provocative act. Like if someone said "I like your girlfriend, she's mine now". Simply saying it doesn't make it so, but you'd want him to shut up nonetheless.
Clearly the US doesn't agree, but we also agree that the US response could have been much more forceful. I'm not suggesting that indiates weakness, but I think what Sampanviking meant was that it was a measured response.
I don't want to put words in Sampan's mouth, but the way I read his post was that this was a victory for China, ergo the US had shown weakness.
Of course the US could have been more forceful, it could have launched a pre-emptive attack on China. But that would have been daft and unthinkable. I think the US' "measured" response as you put it was the sensible option, not because it gave a victory to China but because it put the ball back in China's court without making things significantly worse.
Well everything China does to improve its military capabilities and readiness annoys its neighbours
You see I don't agree with that. People take note of China's military modernisation, but it's China's actions that define how people react to it. Like I don't think anyone is threatened by the Royal Navy building two big new aircraft carriers, despite we haven't had that sort of power-projection capability for several decades.
WRT south korea, China actually forewarned South Korea a few days before it announced its ADIZ.
I wasn't aware of that, but I don't see that warning someone ahead of time you're going to encroach on what they see is their territory is much of a concession.
You can find western forums less professional than this one...
This is a forum staffed by Chinese and non-Chinese mods, and I'm not really sure what your point is. If it's to do with how nationalist Chinese are v other countries, I was merely thinking over possible reasons for declaring the zone. I'm not suggesting Chinese are all rabidly nationalist. Hope there was no misunderstanding there.
Did China mishandle the first day with the B-52s? I see no indication that you think they did. The US "challenged" the ADIZ, but they were so far out it probably wasn't even worth sendign planes up to meet them.
So at what stage will China send planes up? It's easy to dismiss the B-52 incursion as not worth worrying about, but it just begs the question when will the zone be enforced?
Did US support for Japan live up to Japan's expectations? Well, US media is certainly championing support for Japan, but once you look through that veil, the US only sent a couple of their oldest and least survivable bombers, unarmed on the far edge of the ADIZ.
The B-52 is a well recognised sign of American power. It's a message that everyone understands, regardless of what country they come from. Much like sending a battleship somewhere (when navies still had them), despite the arrival of powerful anti-ship missiles.
Compared to past US "warning" acts such as sailing two carriers near the taiwan strait in the third taiwan strait crisis, this response is almost negligible.
Umm, the US was concerned China was going to invade Taiwan. Is there any suggestion China might be readying for an attack on Japan? No. You're comparing apples with oranges.