The way I see it, either there is indeed a cutout amidships which accounts for the no.2 starboard elevator, which currently is inconveniently hidden from view by the annoyingly placed crane and roof, and so in the absence of a more unobstructed photo or an alternate angle on the hull there's really not much basis to draw a conclusion other than the common expectation that this would be similar in layout to the Ford class, hence in a 3-elevator config it stands to reason the no.2 starboard elevator would be as indicated a la the Ford class i.e. with both starboard elevators forward of the island;if the starboard elevator was further back does that mean the island is still in between the two elevators like with the Fujian rather than behind both as with Ford's layout?
Or this just isn't a Ford-pattern at least where elevator placements is concerned, where a starboard elevator which is positioned further aft a la the Nimitz class's no.3 elevator near the stern may be the placement PLAN designers have decided on -

... which would also be more or less consistent with previous PLAN configs of each elevator forward and aft of the island in between like you said.
Personally though, from a hangar operations standpoint, if one takes into consideration the possibility that 004 may retain the use of turntables for aircraft conveyance like 001, 002 and 003 before it -

... then I can see an argument where having a more rearward starboard elevator that aligns (or near-aligns) with the port elevator could be a more efficient and space-saving layout, as only two turntables would then be required where the rear one can serve both elevators -

... as opposed to 3 turntables for 3 distantly located elevators, which could result in less aircraft accommodations and more complex handling -

And since the Nimitz has been invoked, then there's the improbable albeit not-impossible proposition of it being a 4-elevator config, like the Nimitz class. In any case all we can do is still speculate for now.
I dunno, that picture of yours looks to be artificially filtered to heck, assuming it hasn't also been so adulterated, seeing as how garbled the text on the red crane looks -Wdym of "Not sure where you got your reference from"? Didn't you see my picture?
This is the original image of my last post. Don't bring up a blurrier one.

It should correctly be 'DALIAN SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.' instead -

There may indeed be an elevator opening amidships as I explained, but personally I wouldn't rely on that specific image of yours as evidence.








