Japan is a stagnating 20th century oil dependent state. It will find survival increasingly difficult in the age of scarcity and climate change.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Saudis are far more on US side than Israel/UAE/India ever be. Saudi prefer permanent solution and US election cycle is short term. I am sure there are people in US that agree with Saudi vision which is in US interest but US has to use hard Power to quickly solve the problem.
UAE may feel betrayed considering what they did for Iran. All those trading ideas originated from UAE (DP World) even Shipping canal through Iran would have benefited UAE and no need for desalination plant.
Saudi not particular care about strait of Hormuz quick opening. these tweets are coming from UAE.
this latest map ignore Iran and India. they are there but not on map and this reflect Saudi approach of not giving them importance. There is alot of stuff in RT Arabic. it is like giving Iran long term incentive to work productively with Royal Kingdoms. Only Russia can do it as there muslims has that limitless patient and high regard for Royals and is these Royals whose investment in Europe and Africa protecting these two continents from wrath of Russia hard power.
.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Probably better here than the Ukraine thread:
Secondly, I was not talking about being useless of other powers. The fact that it's very useful for China means that it's very useful for Russia. Russia is going to have a shit time in a world that is USA/EU centric. It is going to have a much better time in a Sino-centric world. China will never harm Russia unless attacked first but all day all night, NATO thinks about how to harm Russia. So, in pulling the EU down from the fight and forcing the US to face China alone, Russia is helping its own future.
Ahhhhhh touche, except that you forget the big picture. This isn't about Iran; in a world of just USA and Iran, Iran can only fold (although in such a world, the US is unlikely to be interested in fighting Iran since its dominance would be unchallenged). But China is a bigger player waiting to eat America's lunch. Therefore, there is no long term for the US and to win, Iran only needs to drain American resources until China can finish the job. After China surpasses the US, it's going to be drowning in China's wake, no longer bullying other countries. America doesn't have the stamina for this fight; it needed Iran to fold and offer terms quickly without draining American resources and it sure as hell did not get that.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
First of all, you have the order of things confused. Russia first sends its prisoners, and foreign mercenaries before using its core power. Those are expendable. You mean to tell me that if you were in charge, you'd let your main army get decimated before sending cannon fodder??
Secondly, I was not talking about being useless of other powers. The fact that it's very useful for China means that it's very useful for Russia. Russia is going to have a shit time in a world that is USA/EU centric. It is going to have a much better time in a Sino-centric world. China will never harm Russia unless attacked first but all day all night, NATO thinks about how to harm Russia. So, in pulling the EU down from the fight and forcing the US to face China alone, Russia is helping its own future.
Nah, drag it out. When the EU is exhausted and the US has piped down knowing that it is outmatched by China, Russia can unleash what it held in reserve for NATO unto Ukraine and win. If not, I think China can lend a hand since Russia has lent us plenty. They need outside perspective; Ukraine needs to be hit hard by a country that does not consider it a brother.
Last edited:
Emiratis go to China to pay homage and petition China for support. They will need China to mollify Iranian vengeance.
competitor against Trump for shitty-politician post of the year
He is indeed the last king of Goonerland.
He is quite the character. I think he is neurodivergent. This is from his official twitter account: