PRC high bypass engine, turboprop, turboshaft, and other aeroengines

Tomboy

Captain
Registered Member
View attachment 172635
Allegedly WJ-10 and AEP series are not actually the same, hence WJ-10 is not a simple military conversion but a separate new engine in the same performance range.
WL69.jpg
Following up on that, SOYO claims WJ-10 should be of atleast similar performance to PW150A. It is expected to be atleast 30 percent lighter in dryweight compared to WJ-6 while also having atleast 25 percent less PSFC at cruise, it should have a power rating of approximately 3700-3800kW which is similar to the latest WJ-6 variant.

As for the differences between WJ-10 and AEP400/500, it's still too early to say for sure but SOYO personally thinks they only merely share a similar architecture (ie. two shaft free power turbine) but have different performance requirements and external differences.

SOYO's list of turboprop engines and power output
008tJu9Ogy1i8z03bc87pj318w0q2n0m.jpg
Note, apparently WJ-6s on Y-9 actually don't have a 3800kW rating instead only somewhere close to 3400kW, only the special variant for KJ-600 (WJ-6X) reaches that rating. While the commercially certified one on AG600M is even worse at 3200kW.


Specs for WJ-6, probably the commercial variant
008tJu9Ogy1ibp2tgavi0j31cq0lyjyk.jpg
Max takeoff power is ~3200kW and continuous is only 2700kW, while takeoff PSFC is a horrendous 0.33kg/kWh compared to ~0.262kg/kWh of PW150 series and AEP400/500's smaller than 0.258kg/kWh target. It also has a ridiculously high dryweight of 1200kg compared to only 725kg of the PW150A.



Screenshot_20260331_231156_Samsung Internet.jpg
He also commented in another post about AEWC that until another newer, more economical platform like C919 or the rumored 200t class multimission platform appears, it is in his opinion prudent to quickly replace the WJ-6s in KJ-500/700s with WJ-10s in the next 2-3 years to give a massive boost to flight performance and effective combat radius.
 
Last edited:

TheWanderWit

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 172698
Following up on that, SOYO claims WJ-10 should be of atleast similar performance to PW150A. It is expected to be atleast 30 percent lighter in dryweight compared to WJ-6 while also having atleast 25 percent less PSFC at cruise, it should have a power rating of approximately 3700-3800kW which is similar to the latest WJ-6 variant.

As for the differences between WJ-10 and AEP400/500, it's still too early to say for sure but SOYO personally thinks they only merely share a similar architecture (ie. two shaft free power turbine) but have different performance requirements and external differences.

SOYO's list of turboprop engines and power output
View attachment 172699
Note, apparently WJ-6s on Y-9 actually don't have a 3800kW rating instead only somewhere close to 3400kW, only the special variant for KJ-600 (WJ-6X) reaches that rating. While the commercially certified one on AG600M is even worse at 3200kW.


Specs for WJ-6, probably the commercial variant
View attachment 172700
Max takeoff power is ~3200kW and continuous is only 2700kW, while takeoff PSFC is a horrendous 0.33kg/kWh compared to ~0.262kg/kWh of PW150 series and AEP400/500's smaller than 0.258kg/kWh target. It also has a ridiculously high dryweight of 1200kg compared to only 725kg of the PW150A.



View attachment 172703
He also commented in another post about AEWC that until another newer, more economical platform like C919 or the rumored 200t class multimission platform appears, it is in his opinion prudent to quickly replace the WJ-6s in KJ-500/700s with WJ-10s in the next 2-3 years to give a massive boost to flight performance and effective combat radius.
Do you know of any recent news on that 200t class multimission platform? I remember hearing about it, and can't find the original comments of when it was spoken about.
 

LCR34

Junior Member
Registered Member

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
爱若丰狂SOYO历 on AECC official website listing of engines
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

AECC官网产品目录中的 “军用航空动力” 栏目,收录有4型航发产品,包括太行基础型、太行改进型、玉龙涡轴发动机和1100KW级涡轴发动机

“1100KW级涡轴发动机” 应该是指AES100的某发展型号,该型机功率与玉龙类似,同样适配5.5吨级直升机平台。AES100的立项时间甚至比玉龙拿奖还要晚了差不多一年,预计将配装国产新一代5.5吨民用直升机平台

作为 “第一型具有国际竞争力和完全自主知识产权的1000kW级先进民用涡轴发动机”,AES100相比玉龙有着明显的代际领先 (玉龙是典型的三代涡轴),其发展型号能被AECC列入 “军用航空动力” 栏目,说明该型机或许已经有了军机配装对象

玉龙”发动机 looks like WZ-9 turboshaft for Z-10 helicopter.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This new 1100kW class turboshaft looks to be an upgraded turboshaft for a new generation 5.5t class helicopter. So, we are getting on Z-10 replacement using an engine with noticeable upgraded thrust.
 

Tomboy

Captain
Registered Member
WZ-9G is already 1200kW, so this 1100kW engine would not be anything interesting over the current engines in Z-10 in terms of flight performance, maybe fuel efficiency and higher reliability.

There also isn't anything on a Z-10 replacement in that post, they just said as this engine was placed in the military section, it might have already been installed on something.
 

Tomboy

Captain
Registered Member
aep13134.jpg
It is rumored that AEP500 has been soft cancelled/put on hold, It's just AEP400 and WJ-10 for now. Of which the latter is basically confirmed to have a rating of 3800kW (Similar to highest power rating of WJ-6 variants). Which would also mean Y-15 likely won't have a payload capacity any larger than Y-9 at 25t.
 
Last edited:
Top