2026 Iran War Strategy and Analysis

another505

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Trump Tells Aides He Wants Speedy End to Iran War​


Taco is tired of watching 2 min videos of winning explosions every day. His drug ridden brain needs new stimulations.

Anyways, long on oil and some gold to hedge. This isn't going to end anytime soon. Trump is going to "learn" he can start war whenever he wants but he can't end war whenever he wants.
 

mack8

Senior Member
Just speaking a bit of the aircraft losses part, let's not forget to add the juicy american tankers/AEWs hit by the iranians recently, and not forget about the arab Typhoons and other planes/helos lost or damaged to date. Also to consider two factors, first the likely zionist losses, are we to believe that they had absolutely no planes lost or damaged? Their censorship is both draconian and unequaled. Plus considering that likely most zionist airfields must have been targeted by iranian BMs and drones repeatedly, are we to believe that not one single plane, zionist or otherwise wasn't hit? The fact that chinese sat imagery providers still kowtow to zionist/western censorship is disappointing, but hopefully we'll get to see images from israel sooner or later.
 

sheogorath

Colonel
Registered Member
Just speaking a bit of the aircraft losses part, let's not forget to add the juicy american tankers/AEWs hit by the iranians recently, and not forget about the arab Typhoons and other planes/helos lost or damaged to date. Also to consider two factors, first the likely zionist losses, are we to believe that they had absolutely no planes lost or damaged? Their censorship is both draconian and unequaled. Plus considering that likely most zionist airfields must have been targeted by iranian BMs and drones repeatedly, are we to believe that not one single plane, zionist or otherwise wasn't hit? The fact that chinese sat imagery providers still kowtow to zionist/western censorship is disappointing, but hopefully we'll get to see images from israel sooner or later.
It does show that the US(and likely Europe) hasn't internalized any of the lessons of the Ukranian war, either because they think its a one-off war with particular conditions and they still think they are beyond such a war and will steamroll everything, everywhere all the time.

At this point, it can be safe to assume if they do a landing anywhere near the gulf, there won't be any kind of drone jammers or drone interceptors within the MEU's.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
The fact that chinese sat imagery providers still kowtow to zionist/western censorship is disappointing,
Labeling "kowtow" is an extreme strech or missunderstanding how China works. Showing such photo is provocative in China's view unless China is in an open conflict with someone. Regardless China's open objection to US war on Iran, China isn't in the conflict yet. If China officially stepped in like she did in Korean war, I am sure we would have live-streaming of US assets being blown up.

Besides, China's SSO sats do go over the region as regular as they go over China and US because the earth rotates, Iran can get the photos for examing the result and also US/Israeli deployment. It is just that these photos are not allowed to be released to general public.
 
Last edited:

another505

Junior Member
Registered Member

Not only does John Mearsheimer argue that Iran holds all the cards on the escalation ladder, but he also argues that the US *needs* to keep Iranian oil flowing to the global market to avoid an economic collapse. This line of argument is new to me, curious what people think.
I mean, that is what US is doing as they had removed Iranian oil sanction to prevent oil price increasing out of hand..... while at war with them.
Is really 6D chess
 
Tankers, AWACS and manned subsonic platforms in general have been shown to be ridiculously vulnerable now. Chinese acquisition of many AWAC and manned tanker platforms may have not foreseen this development. Fighter type platforms on the other hand have been surprisingly survivable.
100% of tanker and AWAC loss could be attributed to lack of proper basing. In China's case, basing wouldn't be an issue, so only threat to these platforms would be from sniping by 5th generation fighters.
 

solarz

Brigadier
I mean, that is what US is doing as they had removed Iranian oil sanction to prevent oil price increasing out of hand..... while at war with them.
Is really 6D chess
If this is true, then the implication is pretty profound. For example, there's speculation that the US wants to take control of Kharg Island, which handles 90% of Iran's oil shipments. Well, what is the US going to do if they control Kharg island? Are they going to stop Iranian oil from going out the strait of Hormuz? Isn't that completely contrary to the goal of preventing the price of oil from skyrocketing? Controlling Kharg island is not going to secure the strait of Hormuz.
 

CMP

Captain
Registered Member
If this is true, then the implication is pretty profound. For example, there's speculation that the US wants to take control of Kharg Island, which handles 90% of Iran's oil shipments. Well, what is the US going to do if they control Kharg island? Are they going to stop Iranian oil from going out the strait of Hormuz? Isn't that completely contrary to the goal of preventing the price of oil from skyrocketing? Controlling Kharg island is not going to secure the strait of Hormuz.
What they want is for the revenue stream from the oil shipments to be going to Trump's Caymen Islands private bank account instead of to Iran.
 
Top