Z-21/Z-X heavy attack helicopter

Deino

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Indeed apparently we have the clearest image of China's new heavy attack helicopter, so far, and indeed some details appear strange (likely again due to post-processing with AI) like besides the already mentioned weapon stations under the fuselage, the again or still missing gun but also noteworthy it AFAIR for the first time it has no prototype number anymore and carries the PLA symbol.
 
Last edited:

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
May note be ready yet.

Back in late 2010s, mi-28nm prototypes laughed to death for nont having one, but in production form they got it.

Depending on the status of the airframe (e.g.: if it's one of the prototype airframes), it may well be that some subsystems are just not installed.

We've seen that in the past with prototypes of different aircraft types. I remember when some J-20S prototypes didn't have EODAS apertures installed, or some helicopter prototype airframes in years past might miss one subsystem or something.
 

Tessier2501

New Member
Registered Member
From a purely aesthetic view, this helicopter pleases me greatly. I especially love the sharp lines on the fuselage. This flat-surface-to-rounded-corner-to-flat-surface design reminds me of tech products.

However, the nose is ugly, so I had cosmetic surgery on it.
1000025666.jpg
 

Syrida2887

Junior Member
Registered Member
From a purely aesthetic view, this helicopter pleases me greatly. I especially love the sharp lines on the fuselage. This flat-surface-to-rounded-corner-to-flat-surface design reminds me of tech products.

However, the nose is ugly, so I had cosmetic surgery on it.
View attachment 171967
Personally, I think it has the most beautiful engine compartment among the mainstream armed helicopters at present (I really don't like the similar Apache or Havoc co-location modeling).
 

00CuriousObserver

Senior Member
Registered Member
Some of the shrimps are confirming they're fuel tanks

This is by Hole Hole the Chengdu Gay Guy Who is Actually From Hainan

This still is not the clearest image, but it is already clear enough to show that the new auxiliary fuel tank is mounted under the fuselage, confirming the structure previously seen in the same position when the aircraft was in a clean configuration. It had actually appeared in several earlier sightings as well, but because the arrangement was so unconventional, people did not take it seriously and mostly assumed it was just AI-edited nonsense.

In theory, heavy attack helicopters such as the AH-64 and Mi-28 could also fit an auxiliary fuel tank under the belly, since there is physically enough space. But neither the Americans nor the Russians have done so, and earlier domestic models did not either. On those aircraft, if auxiliary fuel tanks are carried, the weapons load usually has to be cut drastically, which has a major impact on sustained firepower.

Only we have achieved this breakthrough. Doing so requires structural reinforcement at the relevant location, along with internal fuel lines connecting the tank to the engines. As a result, when the Z-21 carries a belly-mounted auxiliary fuel tank, it does not have to give up weapon hardpoints the way foreign models, or domestic models like the Z-10, Z-19, and Z-20, do.

This is an advance driven by the PLA helicopter force’s unique requirements for over-water and all-domain operations. Foreign heavy attack helicopters do not face a particularly pressing need for long-range strike missions, so their range requirements are generally not especially high. Our situation is different. In the near future, the operational scenarios being contemplated require greater range, but once the aircraft reaches the far side of the Strait, it must still face intense combat rather than fire off a few shots and withdraw in haste. So the Z-21 cannot sacrifice firepower for range, nor can it ignore range and simply pile on more weapons. Our requirements mean it has to do both: conduct long-range dash missions and still use a heavy weapons load to provide more sustained support for ground forces, blunt enemy counterattacks against the landing force, and push farther inland.

Of course, this does not mean the Z-21 can only carry auxiliary fuel tanks under the fuselage. The traditional stub-wing mounting method remains available, and it may be possible to carry as many as six auxiliary fuel tanks in total, depending on mission requirements. In scenarios where range matters more and exceptionally strong firepower is not required, such as sovereignty-protection missions involving close-in tracking and monitoring of foreign naval vessels and aircraft, this could offer a particularly strong advantage.

This is not a simple matter of hanging an existing auxiliary fuel tank design under the fuselage. The new mounting point has to preserve adequate ground clearance, so the new tank has a smaller diameter than the older model, with greater length used to maintain capacity. In addition, the new auxiliary fuel tank has a more refined aerodynamic design, with a sharper, smoother nose section that reduces drag in flight.

Edit: I'm also not seeing any objections to the insignia. It could potentially indicate its status in the force.
 
Last edited:

Tessier2501

New Member
Registered Member
Personally, I think it has the most beautiful engine compartment among the mainstream armed helicopters at present (I really don't like the similar Apache or Havoc co-location modeling).
I agree! Someone made a comparison graph of those three heavy attack helicopters. It seems the Russians prefer a rounded style (it's even on the Mi-24's canopy), the Americans use a mix of lines and curves, and the Z-21 has nice angles, but not too sharp (like the F-117). It actually almost reminds me of the Comanche…

But I hold my point: that nose ruins everything. I'm not saying they should sacrifice practicality for aesthetics, but, damn…
2e8xq70v56qg1.jpeg
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Maybe it simply does not intend to have a cannon in the first place. Helo as gunship is probably obsolete, when do we ever see attack helo doing gun runs in Russo-Ukraine war? But helo as a ulra-low altitude NLOS platform still has a place in modern combat, which is probably what this thing aim to be.
Russian guns are used quite a lot against drones lately. But a gunpod would probably do the trick.
 
Last edited:
Top