Miscellaneous News

plawolf

Lieutenant General

‘I’d do it all again,’ says Dutch minister at heart of car chip standoff with China​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Right on cue, European idiots gift wrap another escalation step for China for free.

China can rightly point to this interview as clear evidence of the Dutch having not learnt their lesson and showing zero contrition, so the punishment needs to be increased.

It’s kinda surreal that China is tapping the breaks as it doesn’t want to curbstomp EU manufacturing so hard so early, but the Dutch are strapping on banzai headbands and daring China to do it.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
Right on cue, European idiots gift wrap another escalation step for China for free.

China can rightly point to this interview as clear evidence of the Dutch having not learnt their lesson and showing zero contrition, so the punishment needs to be increased.

It’s kinda surreal that China is tapping the breaks as it doesn’t want to curbstomp EU manufacturing so hard so early, but the Dutch are strapping on banzai headbands and daring China to do it.
Y'all need to stop paying attention to what the West says. As you well know, Western politicians are not only full of bluster, but they don't even mean what they say half the time because it's simply posturing for a particular group or individuals, and you've all seen it unfold in real time yet again. Even the hint of China flexing it's muscle prompted Dutch politicians to flurry over a relatively minute issue for China. This was a single company in China that had CEOs and European cabinet ministers panicking and flying to Beijing.

Moreover, all of this talk about "cutting" the West off is just a desire to "punish" Europeans. The reality is that China is making money, there is no actual need to cut the West off. Quite the opposite, it is very useful to keep the West dependent on Chinese inputs so you could cut them off when the need actually arises.

Unlikey Russia, it does not seem that the West is serious about diversifying supply chains. It's been 5 years since covid, I have yet to see any serious "supply chain resilience".
 

Clango

Junior Member
Registered Member
Y'all need to stop paying attention to what the West says. As you well know, Western politicians are not only full of bluster, but they don't even mean what they say half the time because it's simply posturing for a particular group or individuals, and you've all seen it unfold in real time yet again. Even the hint of China flexing it's muscle prompted Dutch politicians to flurry over a relatively minute issue for China. This was a single company in China that had CEOs and European cabinet ministers panicking and flying to Beijing.

Moreover, all of this talk about "cutting" the West off is just a desire to "punish" Europeans. The reality is that China is making money, there is no actual need to cut the West off. Quite the opposite, it is very useful to keep the West dependent on Chinese inputs so you could cut them off when the need actually arises.

Unlikey Russia, it does not seem that the West is serious about diversifying supply chains. It's been 5 years since covid, I have yet to see any serious "supply chain resilience".
That's true, while I'd personally love to see some sort of divine punishment sort of shit, reality would be that keeping the status quo seemingly the same while silently and carefully gaining a grip on the world economically is by far the best outcome for everyone, this is quite literally the economic victory in the civilisation series.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
That's true, while I'd personally love to see some sort of divine punishment sort of shit, reality would be that keeping the status quo seemingly the same while silently and carefully gaining a grip on the world economically is by far the best outcome for everyone, this is quite literally the economic victory in the civilisation series.
Yes, precisely. My next part is not directed at you.

==========================================================

A good way to temper reactions is to put United States in China's place.

Let's say that Mexico suddenly seized a Ford factory or whatever, and US's immediate response was to halt sensitive exports, potentially crippling a part of Mexico's economy, thus forcing Mexican politicians to immediately come begging to D.C. to work out a solution. How would the global media cover this? How would you view the power relationship?

Would you really care what Mexican politicians are saying to various Mexican or Spanish-speaking news? If Mexico retaliated in some other way like banning American universities from some Mexican research initiatives would you care? Would you go like, "Oh no, look at how Mexico is bullying American and America is just taking it!". No, you'd immediately understand that US is in the driver's seat, Mexican politicians are begging in D.C. while trying to save face in front of their Mexican constituents.

You would literally not care about the Mexican side of things, you'd just view this objectively from a power relationship. And yeah, Mexico is a major trade partner of United States, but you wouldn't care. There is an obvious power/tech imbalance similar to China/EU power imbalance. China is far more powerful economically and militarily now. Europe is no longer a powerhouse of innovation anymore, it's no longer a serious threat to Chinese prosperity, no more than Mexico is to United States anyway.

EDIT: Similarly, if United States ultimately relented and agreed to continue the exports to prevent Mexico from suffering major economic damage (for the time beign while negotiations are ongoing), you'd agree that this is a rational, reasonable move. Yeah, if US decided to go nuclear and let Mexico implode you'd have your "lulz that's what happens", but you wouldn't object to either path. In fact, you'd see that long-term, it's wiser for USA to swallow some indignities which are irrelevant anyway, and maintian a cordial relationship with Mexico. The actual "power" is visible to any serious person anyway and the point was already made.

And yeah Mexico could try to simply "exploit" US's kindness and try to diversify their supply chains to prevent this kind of thing from happening again (while secretly plotting to take over US investments in Mexico in the future), but would USA be seriously threatened by such things? No of course not. Mexico hasn't shown any capability that it could pull this off, they can't even control their crime.

SImilarly, Europe can't even figure out the future of the EU, can't cope with Russia, and is also being bullied by Trump. This is not an economic bloc that represents an existential threat to China today. It's a stagnant dinosaur on life support.
 
Last edited:

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
There is also Rolls Royce.

_____

Indian academic says India is worse than you can imagine.
_____
RR Aero is limited firm with only 20K employees in UK and survived with that wide body/fighter engines for Royal Kingdoms. They want diversified options.
single segment firms that has worked for so long with Royal Kingdoms should have perfect record.
It is like millions of Indian working more competently around the world for Royal Kingdoms despite India internal short comings.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by Reuters
June 2, 2025
Clark has previously expressed frustration with its other engine supplier, Britain’s Rolls-Royce, because some engine models have struggled with maintenance problems when operating in the world’s hottest climates.

On Sunday, Clark said opportunities still exist in the Gulf region for Rolls-Royce if it can deliver the required performance.

He left open whether a potential deal for Rolls-powered Airbus A350-1000 jets, which faltered over the durability of their engines at the Dubai Airshow in 2023, would be ready in time for the next edition in November this year.

“I am not sure about that,” he told reporters.
 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
The "evidence" doesn't matter, Wingtech has the right to fire every European staff and move all equipment to China because it's their company, to even humour them on the concept is wrong. Europe culture does not have the concept of law and the only way to treat them is like an animal with rewards and pain.
You mean like Pavlov's dogs?

RR Aero is limited firm with only 20K employees in UK and survived with that wide body/fighter engines for Royal Kingdoms. They want diversified options.
single segment firms that has worked for so long with Royal Kingdoms should have perfect record.
It is like millions of Indian working more competently around the world for Royal Kingdoms despite India internal short comings.
RR still has significant market share in engine industry and likely isn't dropping much anytime soon.
 

supercat

Colonel

‘I’d do it all again,’ says Dutch minister at heart of car chip standoff with China​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Good luck, considering that China hasn't fully lifted the export ban of Nexperia chips, according to Financial Times.

Europe’s carmakers face ‘devastating’ chip crisis as Nexperia supply crunch continues​

Executives warn production lines could stop within weeks as the Dutch chipmaker is not sending products to China unit
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Two words: Ryukyu independence - Japan better be careful.

Some nice reverse-indicator from the Economist:

Gaslighting tweet of the day:

LMAO tweet of the day:
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
You mean like Pavlov's dogs?


RR still has significant market share in engine industry and likely isn't dropping much anytime soon.
It is one segment with low employee count. Emirate telling them to improve reliability.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Rolls-Royce was particularly hard-hit during the pandemic, as revenue from widebody engine maintenance dried up. It shed 7,000 staff out of a workforce of 19,000 and changed CEO, but returned to profitability in 2024. Its engines power 33% of the world’s widebody fleet, and have 46% of the order backlog for widebodies.
Over the years, Rolls-Royce has developed many of the engines that have shaped modern aviation as we know it. Its Trent engine series has powered everything from the Airbus A380 to the Boeing 787, and its Trent XWB is the exclusive powerplant for the Airbus A350. The company even manufactured the engines for Concorde.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top