Wonder why they put tarp on some but not others.Clear images of these CCAs are hard to come by.
![]()
Wonder why they put tarp on some but not others.Clear images of these CCAs are hard to come by.
![]()
I wonder why they chose the FH-97 instead of the FH-97AClear images of these CCAs are hard to come by.
![]()
Wonder why they put tarp on some but not others.
I wonder why they chose the FH-97 instead of the FH-97A
What the diff between fh-97 and Fh-97AWe don't definitively know that is FH-97.
The planform is generic enough (used by multiple different nations) that it could be an entirely different CCA/UCAV to FH-96 but with a similar design.
You joke, but that's really the case here. Saw someone on the pro-China side of reddit coming out and admitting they do this on purpose to keep the westerners underestimating Chinese tech. After seeing that, I wonder just how many of the comments are actually comrades in disguise.I honestly think that the comments in the section that are coping especially hard with "China copies everything using plywood" are in reality Chinese-aligned bots trying to get the US population to badly underestimate China.
What the diff between fh-97 and Fh-97A
I'm also pretty sure FH-97A is supersonic given the DSI intakeFH-97 has singular dorsal intake and an internal weapons bay.
FH-97A has dual side intakes and a retractable missile rack (possibly modular).