Miscellaneous News

Iracundus

Junior Member
Registered Member
Does that guy have any concept of making one enemy too many. I mean he probably deserves a special achievement for literally turning the biggest nation of shaft suckers against you (lead by one of the most unmanly leaders this generation in Tedreau) but really is this supposed to be a good idea turning every single nation in the world against you, especially the act of destroying the supply chain to the point where the nation might actually starve. He literally is trying to speed run an achievement where he ends up as literally the first western leader to be assassinated after just being elected after nearly being assassinated once. Now that would be legendary in a way, legendarily stupid as hell. Even if the tweet may not be real but still he did turn most of the world including Canada against the US so such a tweet may as well be fact

All of Trump's actions have to be viewed through the lens of his extreme pathological narcissism, and I speak as a professional in this field. He is an absolute caricature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and he is the type that reacts classically to any perceived ego injury with rage.

By making a statement supporting the other candidate in the Candian election who then lost, Trump is on the losing side. His ego cannot handle that as in his mind he cannot ever be a loser. In order to counteract this in his mind, he has to get in the final word even if it is crass, childish, and makes more enemies. He can never just walk away from an issue like a normal adult might as not worth responding to. He has to respond so that he can in his mind re-establish dominance.

That is why whenever he might come off in any way as losing, he has to spin it as a win, blame someone else as a scapegoat, throw someone under the bus, or get in a final word or final kick. It is petty and childish but that is what extreme narcissists have to do because the alternative of admitting that they are flawed and failed is utterly psychologically unbearable for them.
 
Last edited:

Shadow_Whomel

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is actually normal for and to be expected from the US military, at least as far as the US military and government are concerned when conducting airstrikes.

Even hospitals have been targeted on occasion, even if the civilian casualties were unintentional:


TBF this sort of collateral damage isn't necessarily malicious, but the "cost of doing business" if you're a great power waging war.
I think Doggy is emphasizing the incompetence of the Americans. After bombing the Houthis for so long, they still can't solve their target acquisition issues. This detention center had already been bombed by the Saudis in 2022, and now the Americans are bombing it again. An even more typical example is yesterday's American airstrike on a Houthi quarry. The entire target confirmation process was based solely on some random person tweeting a post labeling the quarry as an underground Houthi base. It's utterly absurd. It's as ridiculous as if I were to claim on SDF that beneath 600 Wanping South Road in Shanghai lies the CCP's secret mind-control base, and the next day the U.S. Pacific Command sends a B-2 to bomb it.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
All of Trump's actions have to be viewed through the lens of his extreme pathological narcissism, and I speak as a professional in this field. He is an absolute caricature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and he is the type that reacts classically to any perceived ego injury with rage.

By making a statement supporting the other candidate in the Candian election who then lost, Trump is on the losing side. His ego cannot handle that as in his mind he cannot ever be a loser. In order to counteract this in his mind, he has to get in the final word even if it is crass, childish, and makes more enemies. He can never just walk away from an issue like a normal adult might as not worth responding to. He has to respond so that he can in his mind re-establish dominance.

That is why whenever he might come off in any way as losing, he has to spin it as a win, blame someone else as a scapegoat, throw someone under the bus, or get in a final word or final kick. It is petty and childish but that is what extreme narcissists have to do because the alternative of admitting that they are flawed and failed is utterly psychologically unbearable for them.
In your professional opinion, how dangerous is he? Is there a risk he'd start a war with China over his battered ego?
 

Iracundus

Junior Member
Registered Member
In your professional opinion, how dangerous is he? Is there a risk he'd start a war with China over his battered ego?

He is dangerous because of his unpredictability. It is not impossible he could start a war. He historically has been the classic bully that backs down and caves when meeting resistance, so that is something that might make it less likely. He is also transactional without any loyalty to Taiwan so that is another factor that might mean he might be willing to ignore any crisis in the area.

However his narcissism means he might also escalate things due to the injury to his ego if he thought he could get away with it and that could lead to a cycle of inadvertent escalation if he chooses to escalate and it turns out to cross one of China's red lines. His ignorance means he is ignorant of how his actions might be seen and where the red lines are.

His narcissism means he also has a tendency to double or triple down rather than admit he is wrong, if there is no scapegoat or other way to back down while claiming a win, such as when he kept escalating the tariffs. His current tariff levels were supposedly higher than what the other people in his administration were originally expecting (~60% I think it was) because he apparently blurted and escalated when China retaliated.

Although he is stubborn with this tendency to double down, and with ideas that seemingly hardened in his head from the 1970's and 1980's (such as his wrong headed conception of how tariffs work), at the same time he seems suggestible at times, by whomever is the last to speak to him. This can swing both ways depending on whether hawks or doves get to him.

There has been the question of whether he has some degree of dementia given his age and his father's history of Alzheimer's.

I guess my final view is that he is too unpredictable and his decision making is basically impulsive and based on many factors that could be out of the control of those that may be trying to manipulate, steer, or restrain him. That impulsivity means many of the things he does are self-destructive and self-defeating, but it also means he is unaware or uncaring of potential red lines that should not be crossed. His racism and that of his lackeys means there is the risk of underestimating China's strength, resolve, and response.

I think other politicians and governments around the world are at risk of misreading Trump and his administration and trying to "sane wash" or read rational motives into actions that may make no rational sense. Take for example the recent anecdote by the Japanese delegation that said the US side was unable to articulate what they wanted in negotiations. Trump has literally started a worldwide trade war because of irrational motives. It's really more about punishing everyone else and trying to act macho and strong. People like Navarro and the rest may backfill motives to try and make it more rational like trying to bring back US manufacturing, replace income tax, or whatever but these explanations are not internally consistent and conflict with each other. There are no real concrete demands the US is trying to make because Trump never had any concrete plan other than some vague hand waving of returning the US to some idealized and non-existent white supremacist perfect past of the 1950's. What he is really after personally is the feeling of power and the desire to watch the heads of other states grovel before him, pleading and begging him for a deal, like a mafia godfather.
 
Last edited:

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
In your professional opinion, how dangerous is he? Is there a risk he'd start a war with China over his battered ego?
He doesn't even have the balls to ban TikTok.
If you take a step back and look at everything Trump has done, or Americans in general for that matter, the central theme to everything is they're cowards who exclusively attack those who can't hit back.
It's also why the only Trump policy that has been successful so far are domestic, Americans are the only ones too cowardly to fight back against Trump.

Not to say they won't go to war with China, but it won't be their choice, it will be Israel forcing them kicking and screaming, but even then Israel still couldn't get them to go to war with Iran so far, the coward is just too strong in the animal.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week as China tariffs start to bite​

  • “It’s a precipitous drop in volume with a number of major American retailers stopping all shipments from China based on the tariffs,” said Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles.
  • Shipments from China make up about 45% of the business for the port, though some transport companies will be looking to pick up goods at other points in Southeast Asia to try to fill up their ships, Seroka said.
  • Data on shipments out of China had already started to signal slowing trade volume to the U.S., alarming some economists.

Shipments from China to the West Coast of the U.S. will plummet next week as the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs leads companies to cut their import orders.

Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, said Tuesday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” that he expects incoming cargo volume to slide by more than a third next week compared with the same period in 2024.

“According to our own port optimizer, which measures the loadings in Asia, we’ll be down just a little bit over 35% next week compared to last year. And it’s a precipitous drop in volume with a number of major American retailers stopping all shipments from China based on the tariffs,” Seroka said.

Shipments from China make up about 45% of the business for the Port of LA, though some transport companies will be looking to pick up goods at other points in Southeast Asia to try to fill up their ships, Seroka said.

“Realistically speaking, until some accord or framework can be reached with China, the volume coming out of there — save a couple of different commodities — will be very light at best,” Seroka said.

Along with the lower volume of goods, Seroka said he expects roughly a quarter of the usual number of arriving ships to the port to be canceled in May.

Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs on Chinese goods on April 2, which led to escalation on both sides, eventually resulting in both the U.S. and China imposing levies of more than 100% on many goods from each other. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has described the situation as “unsustainable” but there has been no sign of substantial negotiations between the two countries.

Data on shipments out of China had already started to signal slowing trade volume to the U.S., alarming some economists. Apollo Global Management’s chief economist, Torsten Slok, recently laid out a timeline where lower imports from China leads to layoffs in transportation and retail industries in the U.S., empty shelves and a recession this summer.

Seroka said he thinks U.S. retailers have about five to seven weeks before the impact of the curtailed shipments begins to bite, partly because companies stocked up ahead of Trump’s tariff announcements.

“I don’t see a complete emptiness on store shelves or online when we’re buying. But if you’re out looking for a blue shirt, you might find 11 purple ones and one blue in a size that’s not yours. So we’ll start seeing less choice on those shelves simply because we’re not getting the variety of goods coming in here based on the additional costs in place. And for that one blue shirt that’s still left, you’ll see a price hike,” Seroka said.
 
Top