Trump 2.0 official thread

mack8

Junior Member
You have to give it to the zionists, they are relentless, ruthless and united in whatever their dark goals are. They managed to literally take over in a few decades what was once the most powerful empire of our times, the US, and now they just snap their fingers and the US will do their bidding. They must be the best organized and most successful crime cartel in the world. China should be careful to watch out for them.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
You have to give it to the zionists, they are relentless, ruthless and united in whatever their dark goals are. They managed to literally take over in a few decades what was once the most powerful empire of our times, the US, and now they just snap their fingers and the US will do their bidding. They must be the best organized and most successful crime cartel in the world. China should be careful to watch out for them.
They don't look like us; they can't mesh in like cancer cells. And we knew what they were decades ago. After WWII, populations of them wanted to settle in China. For humanitarian reasons, we did not reject them outright, but the Chinese government told them that they may stay and make their living in agriculture. They are banned from middle-man trading and absolutely banned from politics. They left.
 

mst

Junior Member
Registered Member
China-Owned Supertankers Face $5.2 Million in Fees Per US Call

Made-in-China oil supertankers are set to be slapped with more hefty charges under America’s latest proposal to penalize ships manufactured in the Asian nation as the trade war between Washington and Beijing rages on.

China-made supertankers sailing under non-Chinese owners or operators can expect to be hit with a surcharge of nearly $1.9 million upon calling at a US port under the new rules, according to estimates by the research arm of Arrow Shipbroking Group. The sum balloons to $5.2 million for any China-owned or -operated ships, the firm said in an April 18 note. (Bloomberg)

1745282154775.png
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
China-Owned Supertankers Face $5.2 Million in Fees Per US Call

Made-in-China oil supertankers are set to be slapped with more hefty charges under America’s latest proposal to penalize ships manufactured in the Asian nation as the trade war between Washington and Beijing rages on.

China-made supertankers sailing under non-Chinese owners or operators can expect to be hit with a surcharge of nearly $1.9 million upon calling at a US port under the new rules, according to estimates by the research arm of Arrow Shipbroking Group. The sum balloons to $5.2 million for any China-owned or -operated ships, the firm said in an April 18 note. (Bloomberg)

View attachment 150440
they want an oil shortage that badly huh?

US imports 8.33 million barrels per day.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Total global oil trade is 77 million barrels per day.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Tankers will just not sell to the US or force buyers to eat the port costs.
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
I like Trump, but he is a real dumb shit.

All the moves he has made, has boxed himself in, but not only that, he has boxed himself in the worst possible way.

That is why we are seeing these juvenile antics from President Trump.
I dislike him very much during his last presidential term. Because I have a low tolerance for fools.

He is obviously too intoxicated with the feeling of being a boss, but he doesn't understand that the president is not an emperor.
You see those ridiculous views of MAGA, the kind of supporters make the kind of president.

Some Chinese scholars (I forget who it is, maybe Shen Yi/沈毅) have called for an end to trying to analyze the intentions behind Trump's actions, and instead for psychologists to assess Trump's mental state.

The Navarro was a false propagandist who fantasized about returning to the classical mercantilist era.
The most serious problem is that Trump seems to want to use tariffs to coerce the world into paying for America's massive debt, which is too arrogant. He is on the verge of publicly proclaiming that the world should serve America for free.
 
Last edited:

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
among the strongest indications of this trend was the firing or reassignment of six National Security Council (nsc) officials, which became public on April 3rd. That was apparently prompted by Laura Loomer, a right-wing conspiracy theorist who met Mr Trump a day earlier. Ms Loomer said the officials were “disloyal people” who helped to sabotage Mr Trump. Yet her demands seem to align closely with those of the restrainers (including Donald Trump junior) who want to root out those they see as “neocons” bent on provoking war with China.
Agent Coomer o7
 

zbb

Junior Member
Registered Member
That's really how it should be in a properly functioning capitalist free market economy. There should be plenty of competition for everything so that no one makes an excessive amount of profit.
Corrected your terminology. Capitalism and free market economy are not the same thing. In fact, it increasingly looks like capitalism is antithetical to free market economy. I'm using "free" market in its original definition by Adam Smith as one that's free from economic rents and persistent large profits are manifestations of economic rents.
 
Last edited:

tamsen_ikard

Senior Member
Registered Member
China-Owned Supertankers Face $5.2 Million in Fees Per US Call

Made-in-China oil supertankers are set to be slapped with more hefty charges under America’s latest proposal to penalize ships manufactured in the Asian nation as the trade war between Washington and Beijing rages on.

China-made supertankers sailing under non-Chinese owners or operators can expect to be hit with a surcharge of nearly $1.9 million upon calling at a US port under the new rules, according to estimates by the research arm of Arrow Shipbroking Group. The sum balloons to $5.2 million for any China-owned or -operated ships, the firm said in an April 18 note. (Bloomberg)

View attachment 150440
If China does not respond to US port fees with its own port fees, then it can say goodbye to its ship building industry.
 
Top