Miscellaneous News

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
If that page is not a long term trolling project, then we are looking at a circus here. Gordon Chang has an explanation because he is at least making a lot of money out of his con artistry. And, dare I say, he is kinda believable for an average non-politically-versed American.

This guy? He has no following. His followers are fake (no interaction other than people mocking him). And the stuff he posts are just dumb shit.

Why would a person even continue such a page? And how he is making money? The existence of nutcases like him is enough for me to conclude that this atlanticist think-tank phenomenon is a US Government project. No private organization or charity would be "generous" enough to fund these people.
He is on another level, like this one guy who always claims to be the president of democratic china.
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is a country that took in Nazis by the bundle, what do people expect? Argentina is fundamentally a "white power" country and it shows. In another point, I remember telling people that BRICS expansion has to be strategic, by including a country like Iran you'll raise suspicions about it and will lend credence to western claims that it's an anti-democratic club. Iran is not necessary when you already have Saudi Arabia. Didn't see the point of Ethiopia either when you have Nigeria, the largest country in Africa and it's largest economy.
Including Iran is actually a very positive move because it shows that if a country makes an effort to move closer to China (and Russia) there is something to be gained. That should encourage others to follow in the same path. Adding the UAE and Saudi Arabia at the same time really symbolises that China's peace brokering in West Asia is sustainable and builds the foundation of a new regional dynamic built on peace and prosperity rather than sectarian violence

It's also very important to not give the US a veto on who is allowed to join the BRICS. By admitting Iran, the BRICS countries are telling the whole world that it's not up to America to decide who's isolated and who isn't. If you're going to take western concerns into account when deciding on new members, then what's the point of BRICS?

Not sure why you mentioned democracy, compared to Egypt, Saudi and UAE, Iran is the most democratic, but that hasn't really helped them, has it
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
Not just a clown,this Gunther Fehlinger character would easily qualify for T4 action in 1939. Just look at the kind of posts he makes, reposting Reddit fantasy maps and pictures of himself drinking coffee all over Eastern Europe. Is this guy for real ?
His ideology is national socialism, he considers eastern Europe to be lebensraum which thanks to the EU it now is. Pretty soon Germany will be a problem for everybody, just like in WW1 and 2.

The emergence of him and his ilk should be a lesson to all. The USSR and the allies went soft on Germans and didn't give them the punishment they deserved.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
If BRICS becomes another Warsaw Pact or Comintern or Cominform or whatever then I'm afraid it will be a pointless alliance. It should not be openly anti-west but rather make clear its members are countries who desire a forum for the Global South to address issues and strengthen trade and diplomatic bonds. The west's propaganda against BRICS hasn't worked so far because it had no avenue to use to attack it. I can understand including Saudi Arabia, it's oil rich. I can't understand including Iran at this time though, what will this over sanctioned country bring to the table besides liabilities? I'm not against Iran joining BRICS but it's best to wait it out. I wouldn't underestimate the western media if I were you, it is still very powerful and has a grip on the minds of many.

Nigeria isn't any more unstable as Ethiopia that has an actual war or just had an actual war. Where did you get your information about Nigeria's so called instability from? What wrong message will BRICS send by inviting it? Is it because a lot of people feel a potential Nigeria led ECOWAS intervention in Niger is western sanctioned? It goes back to this game of turning BRICS into an openly anti-west organization, like I've said it won't be smart to do so.
Not the same as the Warsaw Pact at all. That was a Union of communist countries. There's no obvious political ideology linking

Inviting Saudi Arabia and not Iran doesn't work. They are the two major powers in the Middle East and having Saudis only could turn the alliance against Iran, the same as Greece and Turkey in NATO.

The west is going to attack China diplomatically no matter how much it tries to appease them. You yourself claimed ECOWAS was a union against western imperialism in west Africa. By your logic that's another avenue to attack Nigeria. Why do you think it's ok for Nigeria to do so but not China?
 

liamban

Junior Member
Registered Member
His ideology is national socialism, he considers eastern Europe to be lebensraum which thanks to the EU it now is. Pretty soon Germany will be a problem for everybody, just like in WW1 and 2.

The emergence of him and his ilk should be a lesson to all. The USSR and the allies went soft on Germans and didn't give them the punishment they deserved.


This is what national socialists do to people like him. Now they spend 60k Euros a year for his cartographic and facial diarrhoea.


He could just be a real life troll?

I know someone like that in real life. Has bipolar personality disorder and delusions of grandeur when on a high.
 

Attachments

  • images - 2023-08-28T092006.057.jpeg
    images - 2023-08-28T092006.057.jpeg
    14.7 KB · Views: 43

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
I can understand including Saudi Arabia, it's oil rich. I can't understand including Iran at this time though, what will this over sanctioned country bring to the table besides liabilities? I'm not against Iran joining BRICS but it's best to wait it out.
Iran is subject to unilateral sanctions. This means that BRICS and SCO members don’t recognise those as international sanctions and that’s why they’ve accepted Iran’s request for full membership into BRICS and SCO. Iran is not subject to major United Nations sanctions, and if go by US unilateral sanctions, then we should kick out China and Russia from BRICS.

US will creating new reasons to vilify BRICS like human rights violations or genocide. US and their vassals objections shouldn't gate keep membership into this essentially anti-G7 bloc.
 
Top