F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by Jeff Head, Dec 1, 2011.

  1. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    23,567
    Likes Received:
    27,623
    how big is that contract I mean money of course

    (https://www.mbda-systems.com/press-releases/17630/ doesn't say)
     
  2. mig-31
    Offline

    mig-31 New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    20
    The whole contract for SPEAR family is 580 millions USD from what I heard.
    https://www.defensedaily.com/u-k-aw...-for-spear-missile-development/uncategorized/
     
  3. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    23,567
    Likes Received:
    27,623
    LOL I guess you'd link stuff from 3 years ago |
     
  4. mig-31
    Offline

    mig-31 New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    20
    SPEAR program isn't really that new. They have been developing it for a long time.
     
  5. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    23,567
    Likes Received:
    27,623
    yeah but 25 minutes ago I asked specifically about SPEAR-EW funding
     
  6. mig-31
    Offline

    mig-31 New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    20
    Well , no idea then. But it probably small since it in demonstration phase and from the look of it, the program use current component and not as ambitious as SPEAR itself when it was envisioned
     
  7. Anlsvrthng
    Online

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    288
    Again, your post is a prime example about the importance ( or lack) of proper mathematics training in the higher education.

    Try to use this simple mathematical methods to design a centreless grinding machine, car suspension, a multiple emitter single band radio network or a stealth airplane and you will realise that the brute force mathematical methods works up to a limit,and beyond that the differential functions and linear algebra is your friend , with massive computational help.

    The simple design rules doesn't work on these field.

    Try to calculate the proper counter/grinding wheel sizes/rpms with your methods for a given part size in centerless grinding . That is soooooo primitive and simple compared to the other problems : D


    Mie calculation is for an ideal sphere, NOT for real aircraft and for polarised waves ( for an ideal sphere the polarisation doesn't matter, because (surprise,surprise) that is a sphere : P ).

    This is the issue, the Mie is a simplified calculation to help the understanding the methods and the general principles, NOT a design rule.

    From that point the rest of your post simple doesn't make sense ,you try to make from a simple calculation guess/gut dictated results for a complex problem.



    RAM important on the air intakes, the edge treatment is the second most important.
    Tertiary important is the general painting : P

    And it is fair to expect they using graphene as well, not iron balls.

    The Russians re-designed the shape of the aircraft as well, so it is more than same fancy paining work an a F-15.
     
  8. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    10,313
    This is the F-35 thread, you're far out in left field again with all your analytics my friend, in fact you have a very poor grasp of logic, so lets stick to the topic at hand and not your bull shit philosophy.... please.....
     
    Brumby and mig-31 like this.
  9. mig-31
    Offline

    mig-31 New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    20
    Oh I do have proper mathematic training in higher education. You are confusing between a simple definition and a simple equation. They do not neccesary go hand in hand. A phenomenon can have very simple definition yet need very complex equation to calculate. Take for example: the definition of gravity and black hole is very simple. The equation and calculation however aren't. The definition of stealth technology and general rules aren't actually complex. For example: Using serrations to break up surface wave return and redirect them toward less important direction is very simple concept to grasp. How long the edge should be, what direction it should face, what is the beam width of the backscatter are what you need computer to calculate. But the general principles can still be explained with words


    Well no. Mie scattering is a phenomenon happen when wavelength is a at a certain size vs the object. The sphere is used for illustration because it is simple object, same in all orientation, it doesn't have a secondary smaller part that could result in some parts in optical region and some parts in Mie region. In other words, Mie resonance is the phenomenon when wavelength reach a certain size vs object, it is not only the phenomenon with a sphere but all object. The sphere is used because it is the same in all orientation and doesn't have secondary interaction like normal object, which make the calculation a lot more simple. But the design principle doesn't change. From the sphere example, they can extrapolate that some parts of aircraft can cause Mie resonance with wave if they are small enough vs the wave, and Mie scattering is ALWAYS frequency dependence regardless whether you use simple sphere or a complex aircraft. Because it rely on the interaction between specular and creeping wave return.




    The most important part for LO aircraft is avoiding 90 degrees corners which Su-34 have a bunch of. Su-34 also have zero edges treatment to know of: no serration in panel gap, no distinct magnetic absorber in panel gap and trailing edges. The inlet is literally a straight inlet that expose turbine blades. Heck even the B-1B and F-18E/F has engine blocker to shield the turbine fan blades from radar wave while Su-34 has none. It simply not stealthy in any shape or form.
    B-1B inlet
    [​IMG]
     
  10. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,394
    Likes Received:
    10,727
    Bull crap!! The US made no profit from the war. Was it devastated? No it was not, but that’s because the mainland of the US was never invaded. There were undeveloped territory invaded by Japan at a loss for them.

    The US entered the war still in recession and ended the war still in recession. It took until the year 1951 to recover from the depression followed by the war. That was as the US really started kickstarting it’s economy.

    The production of lend lease was done at a loss the British, European allies Soviets and Chinese were given arms at the promise that they would be “returned” after the war. In practice this never happened. Arms were built at cost not cost plus profit and in the war wars civilian production was virtually stopped across most industry for war production. End of war only liberty ships were returned everything else stayed where it was either has it was damaged or destroyed Or inducted in the rebuilt armed forces of the post war nations. That was in modern terms $980+ Billion that the US tax payers ate. That’s just lend lease alone. Then the US deployments and operations, the Manhattan program, the Marshal plan post war, the Occupations of Germany and Japan, POWs, Veterans care these weren’t a profit they were expenses. All passed to the American economy and taxpayers as bills not profits.

    Your whole argument now is MIC Conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theory that works both ways in the Russian system that is notorious for kickbacks Skimming off the top and more.
     
    #7270 TerraN_EmpirE, Nov 17, 2019
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2019
    Air Force Brat and Brumby like this.
Loading...

Share This Page