Chinese Economics Thread

Discussion in 'Members' Club Room' started by Norfolk, Jan 10, 2008.

  1. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    287

    Every trade needs a widely available money.

    If I have the money in my pocket to shop then the opposite side of the ledger ( central bank) can count that money as pure profit (minus cost of issuing), and I pay that price for the opportunity to use that coinage for my transactions.

    The monetary authority usually part/in close relationship with the government, and the later control the amount of money AND the value of money in circulation with taxation.



    Now, the trade BETWEEN governments is a different animal.

    Before the USA $ de-goldisation the trade was tightly controlled and small, but Nixon created an opportunity for the FED and for the Capitol to work as a de-facto central monetary authority of the world, and at the same time as the in a limited capability as the central government of the world.


    So , it is ending now.

    The increasing world trade makes a need for the USA dollar, that makes it possible to run a trade deficit, and to be the centre of the world financial/trade transactions.

    but there is no real backing of the USA dollar apart from its military, as soon as the increase of need stop, the dollar will start to loose its value, and that will tank the dollar AND the world trade.

    So, the increase strength of China will make the USA military irrelevant ,ant that in turn will kill the global trade.


    Back to the 60s.
     
  2. james smith esq
    Offline

    james smith esq Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    126
    Does anyone else think that China might be seeking to retaliate against the U. S. by precipitating the dreaded "race to the bottom" currency battle? Although this strategy could, very well, result in a Pyrric victory for China, it would probably be even more devastating to the U. S. as it would likely topple the "house of cards" that is the U. S. economy.
     
    #10212 james smith esq, Aug 8, 2019
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2019
  3. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    287
    You mean there will be high demand for workers in the USA economy, and the good old 50s will came back?

    It won't be good for the corporate elite / owners / Capitol of course.
     
  4. james smith esq
    Offline

    james smith esq Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    126
    The segregated old '50's ain't never comin' back, no matter how hard Nixon and Reagan (both now explicitly revealed as bigots) tried, or Trump tries!

    More like massive capital flight from the debt-ridden U. S. economy, which unlike in the '50s, cannot survive without foreign investores to supplement domestic investment.
     
  5. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    287
    ?
    Interesting, the biggest issue in the West is to found profitable investment opportunities.

    Seriously, I found pile of business loan offers in my mail every day.
    There is a huge pool of workers waiting for productive jobs beyond waiting tables.

    So, there is no sign of lack of capacity and lack of capital to replace whatever it needs.

    And how the capital flight will happens ?

    The foreign investors will sell they houses /apple shares/ lands on fire sales, receiving fraction of the original money that they invested into them in they own currency?
    I think it is better to call it as "biggest transport of wealth to the USA citizens in the history " : )
     
  6. localizer
    Offline

    localizer Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2018
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    1,141
    Well if you know anything about investing you would see the recent shift from stocks to bonds and other more stable investments such as gold.
     
  7. james smith esq
    Offline

    james smith esq Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    126
    Some of us apprehend the inherent dangers of massive deficit spending.
    Borrowing borrowed money to invest in the hopes that borrowing can expand perpetually sure is mathematically logical!
    The capital flight will happen, first in the cessation of investment. As this has its effects, and U. S. holdings begin to bleed value, the selling of U. S. holdings may take place.

    And, btw, the biggest transfer of wealth FROM U. S. citizens to private holdings occurred in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis that was brought on by Western "house of cards" financial practices.

    But hey, myths don't fail 'til they fail!
     
  8. manqiangrexue
    Offline

    manqiangrexue Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    8,402
    No. What you are suggesting resembles an American strategy, to try to attack and depress the rival aggressively even if it means sustaining great self-harm. This is a kamikaze-style tactic borne out of desperation from a relatively stagnant US economy and a growing Chinese economy. That is not what China does because China has such growth buoyancy that no one else has. China's style is to make moves to benefit itself and to keep itself growing. If those moves upset the US, that's OK and if they make the US feel happy, that's OK too, because China's not about keeping the US down; it's about lifting China up.

    It's incredibly ironic because at the start of the conflict, American economists said that China's economy is likely weaker and would sustain greater harm, but its strength would come from the CCP not caring about the Chinese people's suffering. Now, we see the CCP very carefully threading strategies to prevent any harm from coming to its people or economy, nurturing them even if it means not appearing as tough as one can in the face of threats. Meanwhile the US mercilessly tariffs its own citizens and destroys its own industries by bans, sustained counter-tariffs, becoming aggressive exactly at the right to disrupt goodwill sales, etc... all in hopes of dealing damage to China. And so far, we've seen the US take the brunt of the damage despite all these American efforts.

    In essence, China's strategy is to keep China growing and America's strategy is to stop China from growing; everyone is all about China because China truly is the Middle Kingdom.
     
    #10218 manqiangrexue, Aug 8, 2019
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2019
    taxiya, Equation, Shaolian and 2 others like this.
  9. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    23,510
    Likes Received:
    27,609
    now I read
    Economic Watch: China mild inflation provides leeway for economic restructuring
    Xinhua| 2019-08-09 17:36:53 http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-08/09/c_138296613.htm

     
  10. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    287
    Math is a tool.

    And generally, the debt of one person is the wealth of another.

    And more generally, the supply of dollars infinite, it is even not constrained by the available supply of paper. It is fully digital now, so the debt can be inflated away.


    We don't live any more in the commodity money age, like the shell/gold/silver/bitcoin.
     
    ZeEa5KPul likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page