Aircraft Carriers III

Janiz

Senior Member
USS Ronald Reagan and JS Izumo (plus JS Sazanami on the picture, don't know what was the battle group) sailing together again. This time it's not Tokyo Bay but SCS.

07vR9uw.jpg
 
USS Ronald Reagan and JS Izumo (plus JS Sazanami on the picture, don't know what was the battle group) sailing together again. This time it's not Tokyo Bay but SCS.

07vR9uw.jpg
I located the picture in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

2017-06-16 22:59 日2艘護衛艦 與雷根號航母聯合演訓

(right now the only source shown to me by images.google.com)
日2艘護衛艦 與雷根號航母聯合演訓

日本海上自衛隊今天(16日)發布新聞稿表示,海上自衛隊的兩艘護衛艦,13日到15日在南海和美國核動力航空母艦雷根號打擊群聯合演訓,進行各種戰術訓練。

這兩艘護衛艦是日本海上自衛隊的直升機護衛艦出雲號及護衛艦漣號,日本產經新聞報導指出,聯合演訓可能意圖牽制欲加強進出海洋的中國。

出雲號及漣號從5月上旬開始,就在南海和美軍等不斷演訓。

雷根號(USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76)6月1日到9日,也在日本海到沖繩東方海域上,和日本海上自衛隊直升機護衛艦日向號等共同演訓。
translated by google: "Day 2 frigates and Reagan aircraft carrier joint training

Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force today (16) issued a press release that the Maritime Self-Defense Force's two frigates, 13 to 15 in the South China Sea and the US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Reagan combat group joint training, a variety of tactical training.

The two frigates are Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force helicopter frigate and frigate Lianzhong, Japan's Sankei Shimbun reported that joint training may be intended to contain to strengthen the ocean into and out of China.

Izumo and Lian Lian from the beginning of May, in the South China Sea and the US military and other continuous training.

(USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76) June 1 to 9, also in the Sea of Japan to the Okinawa Sea waters, and the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force helicopter frigate day number and other co-operation."
 
Mar 31, 2017
... I consider the Nimitz class the ultimate supercarriers ...
...
Published on Jun 16, 2017
Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) performs high-speed turns in the Atlantic Ocean. Abraham Lincoln is underway after successfully completing its mid-life refueling and complex overhaul and will spend several days conducting sea trials.
MuW5N.jpg

Watch: USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) Shows Off High Speed Turn Capabilities
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
now I read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Congressional leaders, DoD policy makers, and think tank denizens in the age dominated by the strategic goal of reaching 355 ships, risk losing focus on the other critical challenge facing the Navy today: improving the carrier air wing.

Currently the air wing faces three significant challenges that places the carrier’s relevance in jeopardy. First, the its ability to penetrate newly emerging Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2AD) environments increasingly populated by advanced
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
surface to air missiles is challenged. Second, naval aviation faces a shortfall of 100 aircraft that is causing it to burn through planes faster than they are being replaced. Lastly, the air wing lacks the range to reach its targets as the carriers are pushed farther from shore by new anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles. If the Navy does not make significant investments in its carrier air wings, then the super carrier, the naval asset that puts the “power” in power projection and most epitomizes modern American military might, risks being rendered irrelevant.

Fortunately, the Navy is already working on a partial solution for the A2AD environment challenge. The carrier variant of the Lockheed Martin’s stealthy Joint Strike Fighter, the F-35C, is designed to operate with some effectiveness within high threat environments populated with advanced surface to air missile systems. The Department of the Navy intends to purchase
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. These aircraft will combine to place two F-35C squadrons of 10 aircraft on every deploying American super carrier. In addition, the Marine Corps will purchase 340 of the Short Take-Off Vertical Landing (STOVL) F-35B variant of the new aircraft, which will operate from shore bases and smaller amphibious carriers. The Navy’s goal is to have the F-35C reach
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The Navy’s leadership has also recognized the critical nature of its strike fighter shortfall. Each aircraft in the inventory is rated to have only so many hours of wing-life,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, but high tempo operations over the past 15 years of warfare have burned through those hours well ahead of schedule, leading to aircraft being stricken from the inventory long before force planners expected them to retire. These leave fewer aircraft which are called upon to fly more to make up shortfalls, hence accelerating the burnout rate, leading to what programmers call a systemic “death spiral.” Today naval aviation
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the Navy had not planned to buy additional FA-18 E/F Super Hornets. The retiring aircraft were supposed to be replaced by F-35Cs. Fortunately, leaders in the Pentagon and on Capitol Hill have seen the light and plan to buy at least
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Some of these will be the existing FA-18 E/F variant, but some farther into the schedule some could be
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which would come with range extending external fuel tanks, expanded weapons payload and new integrated sensor/shooter combat systems.

The extended range will be critical. Much has been written in the past about the fact that the carrier air wing’s average striking range has shrunk
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
nautical miles over the past 25 years while China and Russia have invested in new A2AD systems such as the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, designed to keep the super carriers from coming within 1,000 miles of their shores in war time. Future air wings composed of F-35Cs, which have an unrefueled combat range of 630 nautical miles, and Block III FA-18 Hornets, which, with their conformal fuel tanks
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, could reach out to 750 miles. However, neither of these alone can bridge the gap imposed by enemy A2AD systems. To reach enemy targets, the carrier will need to bring a mission tanker back to the flight deck.

Mission tankers, as opposed to smaller capacity recovery tankers, have been in the Navy since the 1950s, when the concept of being able to fully refuel a strike package composed of multiple aircraft near their maximum range first appeared. During Vietnam, a modified 85,000 lb. A-3 Skywarrior would be launched early from the carrier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
which it transferred to A-4s, A-7s and A-6s, topping them off before they continued towards targets in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. These aircraft were retired in the early 1990s but they left a memory and a metric. The ability to fully refuel a strike package near its maximum unrefueled range.

Today a strike package sent into an A2AD environment would almost certainly be comprised of F-35Cs being supported by FA-18 E/F Super Hornets and EA-18G Growler jamming aircraft. The mission tanking requirement would be centered around a basic goal of being able to fully refuel six to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Given the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, each aircraft would require a little over 8,000 lbs. of fuel to top off in the 500-600 nautical mile refueling zone. Working from this math, the planned new unmanned MQ-25 Stingray mission tanker should be able to carry the 16,000 to 17,000 lbs. of fuel for transfer to other carrier aircraft at the critical range. Four MQ-25s (80% of a squadron of five) would be required for a six-to-eight aircraft mission package to be able to reach and attack targets over a thousand miles from the carrier, keeping the large platforms both survivable and relevant.

There are other issues that will confront the carrier air wing. For instance, during the 1980s aircraft carriers carried more than 80 aircraft of various designs to do specific missions. F-14 Tomcats (of TOPGUN fame) performed long-range intercept, A-6 Intruders did long-range strike, S-3 Vikings performed anti-submarine patrols ahead of the carrier’s intended path. Other aircraft included the A-4 Skyhawk, the A-7 Corsair II, the E-2 Hawkeye, the HS-3 Sea King helicopter and the KA-3 Sky Warrior mission tanker. These aircraft were focused on projecting power far from the carrier, but today’s air wing hovers around 60 aircraft and is largely made up of strike fighters that were designed to be replacements for shorter range, light attack aircraft of the past. The air wing needs to procure an anti-submarine warfare aircraft as well as a purpose-built penetrating deep strike aircraft. It would be wise if the Navy structured the requirements for the MQ-25 tanker, something built to carry a heavy load a long distance, to allow it to evolve into an all aspect, low radar cross section, long range penetrating bomber. This would provide the Navy once again with the ability to strike targets ashore within future A2AD environments.
...
... size limit reached; the rest is right below:
 
Today the Navy leadership’s focus is largely — and justifiably — on the need to build its battle force back up to 355 ships to protect the nation’s national interests around the world. Some leaders have chosen to focus on the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, while others have highlighted the need to get a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Still others have raised the issue of maintaining
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

But without a large enough, lethal enough and long-range carrier air wing the super carrier will not be the preeminent symbol of its national power. If the aircraft are not capable of penetrating the enemy’s advanced defenses, if there are not enough of them to sustain the fight, or lack the basic mission tanking ability to enable them to reach their targets, then all other basic assumptions regarding American naval power are placed in doubt. Given the nature of international competition today, doubt is not a word the nation should wish to have associated with its Navy and its Navy’s carriers.
continuation of the above post; source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Waouw 35 degrees turn at ~30 knots or ~56 km/h
But curious RCOH end now 4 year before 3.5 ?

Lincoln completely back in the Fleet in august, Washington start RCOH this month also.

The aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) performs high-speed turns in the Atlantic Ocean after completing its midlife Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
now I read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

... size limit reached; the rest is right below:

Finally Master Jura you post an article that practically verbatim quotes the Air Force Brats assessment that without the F-35C, the Ford class would be incapable of performing its mission. Long range refueling at the 600 to 700 mile range will give them the penetration they need, and our little flying display at the Paris Airshow should absolutely silence those negative nabobs! (it won't, and you could put everything they know about air warfare in w thimble and still have room for a full cup of coffee!

Those Fords NEED the F-35C to be relevant, and to remain a threat to A-zone players! period!
 
Top