Development and Application of PLA Datalink Systems

ClaudeJ

New Member
Registered Member
hey there,

here is an excerpt from an article I think to be of interest to us, as it is recent and comes from professionals.
I hope that this thread can be used to collect more pieces of information on that topic and also that this translation can be double-checked by a native Chinese speaker, if that's ok.

空用數據鏈路未來發展趨勢探討 (A Study on the Future Development Trend of Air Data Links)​

in 國防大學空軍指揮參謀學院空權與國防學術研討會論文集 (Proceedings of the Air Power and National Defense Academic Seminar at the Air Force Command and Staff College, National Defense University),
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, p.-60

Title: III. Development and Application of CCP Data Link Systems​


Since the first Gulf War in 1991, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been developing high-intensity data link systems using information technology. Drawing inspiration mainly from the U.S. military command system, which shifted from a "vertical" information acquisition and decision command to a "horizontal" level where all military units could obtain the same intelligence, the CCP recognized the importance of data link systems in the joint operations of the U.S. military. (see Note 16)

(I) Overview of Development​

The development of CCP data link systems began in the early 1980s with the HN-900 model as the initial system, initially used for tactical data processing on naval vessels and information exchange with external equipment. Due to the CCP's early push for digital informationization, the lack of integration in the research and development of the foundational design resulted from the varied needs and independent thinking of different military branches.

From the mid-1990s, the CCP established the HN-901, HN-902, and HN-903 data link systems, implementing technological and destructive capabilities in coordinated naval, air-to-air, and naval-to-land operations. Subsequent developments, such as the TJN-905 data link, marked the maturity of data link system development. During this time, the system could execute rapid responses and feedback between command centers, issuing operational commands and receiving battlefield information, establishing a complete data link system (see Figure 5).

1702080789616.png
Figure 5: CCP Operational Concept Diagram Source: Peng Pengfei et al., "Theory and Engineering of Command Information Systems" (Electronic Industry Press, Published in Beijing, Publisher: Peng Pengfei, Published in May 2020), Page 213.

(II) Current Capabilities​

In 2008, the CCP successfully developed the comprehensive data link and the H/TJN-906 broadband high-speed data link, aiming for a large capacity and high transmission rate. The success of this data link system signifies that CCP technology has officially moved towards the goals of large capacity and high transmission, with functionality and benefits comparable to the U.S. military's Link-16 data link. (see Note 17)

1702080823649.png
Figure 6: DTS-03 Data Link Terminal Source: "mobile01,"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(Retrieved on March 1, 2021).


After 2020, the CCP widely equipped the DTS-03 data link (see Figure 6), which includes various data link terminals that can be configured on different mobile platforms according to actual needs. In recent years, the CCP has completed the "XS-3" tactical broadband high-speed data link architecture. This system, compared to the DS-03, enhances cooperative engagement capability (CEC), increases the transmission rate to 2M/Sec, and can construct an information distribution system for air and ground combat units. It is suitable for fighter jets, bombers, drones, and simultaneously supports high-capacity information transmission for multiple network units with anti-jamming capabilities (see Note 18).


Here's the original text:

三、中共數據鏈路發展與運用

中共自 1991 年的第一次波斯灣戰爭後,開始以數據鏈路訊息技術發展高強度鏈 路系統。主要參考美軍指揮體系從「各軍作戰單位能獲取相同情報的水平型」替代了 「資訊獲得和決策指令上通或下達之垂直型」,(16) 藉此瞭解到美軍聯合作戰使用數據鏈 路指管的重要性。

(一)發展概述

1980 年初中共數據鏈路開始研發,HN-900 型為初期數據鏈路系統,當時僅用於 海軍艦艇戰術資料處理與外部裝備的資訊交換;由於中共初期推動數位資訊化建置, 因各軍種需求不一、想法作為各自為政,所以在研發基礎設計上欠缺整合。

從 1990 年代中,中共建置 HN-901、HN-902,到 HN-903 鏈路系統,實行艦對艦、 艦對空、艦對陸面指管中心三方相互協同作戰科技及摧毀能力。後續研發了 TJN-905 型數據鏈路,進入鏈路系統發展之成熟期,當時已可執行指管間所獲得迅速的反應與 回饋,並完成下達作戰指令與接收戰場訊息,完整建構數據鏈路(如圖 5)。

(二)現況能力

中共為了讓全軍有共通的數據鏈路,於 2008 年已成功研製全軍綜合型數據鏈及 H/TJN-906 型寬頻帶高速數據鏈;此鏈路系統的研發成功,也代表著中共鏈路系統之 技術科技已正式朝向大容量、 (17) 高傳輸的目標邁進,且功能與效益可與美軍 Link-16 數據鏈路等級。

2020 年之後已普遍裝備 DTS-03 數據鏈路(如圖 6),其配備多種數據鏈路終端機, 可以根據實際需求配置於不同機動載台。近年中共已完成「XS-3」戰術寬頻高速數據 鏈路架構,此鏈路系統與過去 DS-03 增長了協同作戰能力(Cooperative Engagement Capability, CEC),傳遞速率亦提升 2M/Sec,並且可建構空、地面作戰單位的訊息分配 系統,多適用於戰機、轟炸機及無人機等,更可同時支援多重網路單位之大容量資訊 傳遞及具抗干擾功能。(18)


圖 5:中共作戰概念圖 資料來源:彭鵬菲等人,《指揮信息系统理論與工程》(電子工業出版社,出版地:北京市,出版者: 彭鵬菲,出版年:2020 年 5 月),頁 213。

圖 6:DTS-03 數據鏈路終端機 資料來源:《mobile01》,<
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
> (檢索日期:西 元 2021 年 3 月 1 日)。

16 羅振瑜、吳幕強,〈中共數據鏈路發展與運用研析〉,《海軍學術雙月刊》,第 53 卷第 6 期,2019 年 12 月,頁 105。
17 羅振瑜、吳幕強,〈中共數據鏈路發展與運用研析〉,《海軍學術雙月刊》,第 53 卷第 6 期,2019 年 12 月,頁 107。
18 羅振瑜、吳幕強,〈中共數據鏈路發展與運用研析〉,《海軍學術雙月刊》,第 53 卷第 6 期,2019 年 12 月,頁 109。


PS: a couple previous topic I could find, in the PLAN section though:
 

ClaudeJ

New Member
Registered Member
You post a Taiwanese paper on PLA Datalink and ask for analysis and translation. Ummm....
I don't understand the issue. Could you please elaborate?
I'm ignorant of many sensitivities around here and I would welcome your advice if I'm doing something blatantly rude.

To clarify, I'm not asking for a translation. I did write that I'm not a native speaker and if someone can double-check, that'd be great.
 

GTI

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't understand the issue. Could you please elaborate?
I'm ignorant of many sensitivities around here and I would welcome your advice if I'm doing something blatantly rude.

To clarify, I'm not asking for a translation. I did write that I'm not a native speaker and if someone can double-check, that'd be great.
You’re very new here, aren’t you?

Also, is this supposed to be “flame bait” by calling them “CCP datalink systems”. What is this, a push button system for voting on the party room floor (it’s CPC by the way)?

Could mods please come and lock (or clean up) this thread, please?
 

ClaudeJ

New Member
Registered Member
Looks like the automatic translation made you very upset. Please accept my apologies, I wasn't aware of that. As you pointed out, I'm very new around here

For my edification, and to avoid such a mistake in the future. How is it acceptable to translate it? I'll gladly rephrase it to avoid any trouble, and focus on the actual topic.

Also, if the information such as the dates are faulty, and that you can recommend another source on that topic, I'll be happy with that too.
 
Last edited:

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Looks like the automatic translation made you very upset. Please accept my apologies, I wasn't aware of that. As you pointed out, I'm very new around here

For my edification, and to avoid such a mistake in the future. How is it acceptable to translate it? I'll gladly rephrase it to avoid any trouble, and focus on the actual topic.

Also, if the information such as the dates are faulty, and that you can recommend another source on that topic, I'll be happy with that too.

It's not about that per se, it's more that you're taking a Taiwan/ROC MND report and asking for a review of the translation on it, and while I understand it is just a request conveyed in a normal manner, the underlying connotation is that you think the document itself is worthwhile to read or delve into and worth people's time here to review its translation.

The fact that their reports call the PRC and PLA by nature as "中共" really doesn't help either.


Taken altogether it is not so much offensive so much as tiresome.



My advice, seeing some of your recent posts in recent times, is to don't expect to get too concrete information whether it's in designations of systems or characteristics of their performance, especially if it is for datalinks and avionics and those side of things.
 

ClaudeJ

New Member
Registered Member
Thank you for contextualizing things, Blitzo.

As a newcomer and foreigner, it's hard to figure out what is worth mentioning and what shouldn't be asked. I think I now understand what I should have left out.

Thanks for the advice.
 

Staedler

Junior Member
Registered Member
Thank you for contextualizing things, Blitzo.

As a newcomer and foreigner, it's hard to figure out what is worth mentioning and what shouldn't be asked. I think I now understand what I should have left out.

Thanks for the advice.
To put it another way, you're asking about a secretive topic by nature which, as Blitzo says, won't have concrete information publicly available. Then on top of that, it's a very biased source (which you can tell from the liberal use of CCP/中共).

So it's an piece on a subject you weren't likely to get any useful information on the begin with followed up with a bad source.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Thank you for contextualizing things, Blitzo.

As a newcomer and foreigner, it's hard to figure out what is worth mentioning and what shouldn't be asked. I think I now understand what I should have left out.

Thanks for the advice.
You can start off by not using terms like ccp, which is Sinophobia 101. The correct term is cpc. Although in this case, I think you are asking about pla, so I am changing subject to that
 
Top