Why PAK-FA So Cheap Compared To F-22 and F-35?

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by legoboy, Mar 10, 2013.

  1. legoboy
    Offline

    legoboy New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    F-22 - 150m
    F-35 - 107m
    PAK-FA - 54m

    What makes the PAK-FA so much cheaper?

    Cheaper construction? Cheaper parts?
     
  2. jobjed
    Online

    jobjed Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,048
    Likes Received:
    5,351
    A lower rating on the purchasing power parity index perhaps? AKA, lower cost of living.
     
  3. siegecrossbow
    Offline

    siegecrossbow Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    7,393
    Lower cost of production means more competitive market price.
     
  4. kyanges
    Offline

    kyanges Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    106
    Isn't he asking why the plane is cheaper, not how being cheaper will benefit it?
     
  5. Lion
    Offline

    Lion Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,985
    Likes Received:
    8
    Cheaper raw material? (Russian big country, it need not import most of the raw material)

    Cheaper labour? (Russian scientist and skill labour are pay less compare to western counterpart)
     
  6. jobjed
    Online

    jobjed Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,048
    Likes Received:
    5,351
    Pretty sure "more competitive market price" translates to cheaper.
     
  7. kyanges
    Offline

    kyanges Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    106
    I'm ashamed to have my brain dazzled by synonyms.

    I completely misinterpreted his point. Thanks.
     
  8. jobjed
    Online

    jobjed Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,048
    Likes Received:
    5,351
    Cheers!
     
  9. siegecrossbow
    Offline

    siegecrossbow Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    7,393
    Another point I want to make is that the Russians often use interesting engineering solutions to overcome limitations in manufacturing techniques and materials. Take the SR-71 and MIG-25, for instance. The Americans used titanium to protect the aircraft from overheating when it was traveling at high Mach speeds whereas the Russians resorted to stainless steel. Although it came at significant weight penalties the Russians still managed to achieve what they set out to do. The latter is obviously less expensive than the former.

    There is a humorous article by an aerospace engineer on CJDBY on the differences between Russian and American turbojet/turbofan engines. When I have time I'll try translating it.
     
  10. Skywatcher
    Online

    Skywatcher Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    782
    Mind you, we won't really have a good idea of the PAK-FA's cost until closer to the IOC date. The Russians, like everyone else, are subject to cost spirals.
     
Loading...

Share This Page