US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The A-10 and U-2 will remain in service

Washington, the needs of the US Air Force are so important that the fleets of Fairchild A-10 and Lockheed U-2 should remain in service longer than expected. Indeed, the publication of the president's budget request for 2018, does not foresee the retirement of the famous A-10 "Warthog" or of the venerable spy plane U-2, announced this week of the leaders of the Force l ' US Air Force.
"The world has changed, so we are trying to maintain our commitment capabilities," said General James Martin, Assistant Air Force Assistant for the budget. "With respect to U-2, we plan to Keep this platform a long time. ... There is no retirement date. "

An Air Force spokesperson confirmed that the retirement of the A-10 fleet had also been eliminated indefinitely due to the lack of alternative means.
What the budget provides :

The USAF 2018 Budget documents show full funding for the entire Fairchild A-10 "Warthog" fleet while expanding the service of Lockheed U-2 spy planes. This decision is a major victory for Congress, which has repeatedly denied attempts to remove the A-10 and U-2 from the service.
According to the latest USAF operational report, experts believe it is not possible for the air force to continue its current operational pace without the U-2 and A-10s.
According to the latest estimate, the A-10s will remain at least in service until 2021. It is only on that date that a new estimate of needs will have to be made in order to determine the future of the A-10s.

Bridging the Future :

For the US Air Force Air Strategic Combat, these five short years will allow us to think about an alternative solution to fill the Lockheed-Martin F-35 deficits. With the withdrawal of the A-10 fleet, the US Air Force will end up with a loss of capability in close air support. Except for the recent conflicts, there has been a crucial need to be able to support ground forces. In a recent report, General Herbert Carlisle alluded to the possibility of a new platform. The current UAVs, due to their fragility, can not assume this role, therefore, if the A-10 is not replaced by a specially designed aircraft, the USAF will lose significant tactical support capacity on the ground. This shortcoming will have serious consequences for the troops on the ground.
The Lockheed U-2 is a high altitude reconnaissance aircraft that was used intensively during the Cold War to observe the territories of the former USSR. The main characteristic of the U-2 is its ability to fly at high altitudes (70,000 feet, about 21,000 meters, twice as high as airliners) to be out of range of anti-aircraft defenses. It has a large operating range, but at a relatively limited speed.
Technically, the U-2 could be considered a "propelled glider" because of its huge wings found on gliders. The landing and take-off of this aircraft was very delicate: indeed, the Lockheed U-2 has a front axle and a tandem rear axle (unlike other planes with two rear trains and one ), To which are added stabilizing wheels at the ends of the two wings. These rollers fall off on take-off, lightening the aircraft, but making the landing all the more difficult and requires ground personnel to intervene on each landing.

The first spy flights of the Lockheed U-2 took place in 1956. Tested since Zone 51. The first objective was to locate and photograph strategic intercontinental missiles as part of air reconnaissance programs.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Today at 6:05 AM
a hit:
‘Direct collision’ for US homeland missile defense interceptor test against ICBM target
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related: Increasingly sophisticated test plans for US homeland missile defense system on horizon
On the heels of a successful intercept test of its homeland missile defense system against an intercontinental ballistic missile target, Missile Defense Agency Director Vice Adm. Jim Syring detailed plans to continue to challenge the system to ensure it is ready to go up against threats from North Korea and Iran, not just now, but against what is anticipated in the future.

Tuesday’s intercept test for the U.S. Ground-based Midcourse Defense System — designed to defend against intercontinental ballistic missile threats from North Korea and Iran — was a success that Syring characterized on a phone call to reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday as “a complete obliteration” of the target designed to represent an ICBM threat from Iran or North Korea.

The test marks the first time the GMD system has gone up against an ICBM class target, although some previous tests have featured intermediate-range ballistic missile targets that have approached ICBM speeds.

Syring said intelligence forecasts and projections on where Iran and North Korea's technology might be in terms of reentry vehicles, countermeasures and rocket motors down the road helped the agency design a test target that would replicate a threat in the 2020 time frame in Tuesday’s test.

North Korea’s prolific missile testing is showing that its capabilities continue to grow and successful tests of the GMD system specifically designed to go up against those possible missile threats are imperative, defense officials have said.

The agency is already looking ahead to a more challenging test of the GMD system in 2018, roughly estimated to take place in August or September, according to Syring.

The target will represent the same range and velocity as the ICBM target used in Tuesday’s test, but in 2018, the MDA will use two GMD ground-based interceptors to go up against that target, he said.

Syring said using two interceptors in the test replicates real-world operations where two interceptors are generally used to take out a target, one serving as a backup if the first fails. “We want to exercise the GMD system with more than one interceptor to gather data for what a first interceptor would do, what the second interceptor would see — the next step in ever-increasing operational realism,” he said.

The director added that while Tuesday’s test demonstrated the GMD system “certainly keeps pace with and helps us outpace the threat through 2020,” new development by the MDA is conducted to redesign the kill vehicle on the interceptor to improve the reliability and performance against an evolving threat.

The redesigned kill vehicle will be tested by the end of calendar year 2019, he said.

The MDA is also funding a newer kill vehicle — the Multi-Object Kill Vehicle, or MOKV — in fiscal year 2018. Development will begin in 2018, and “we are targeting the 2025 time frame for that,” Syring said.

There are three companies designing a kill vehicle that can take out multiple warheads with a single interceptor. Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and Boeing were awarded $9.7 million contracts in August 2015 by the MDA to work on designs.

Syring said the MDA is also planning to test the GMD system against a salvo of threat-representative targets in the 2023 timeframe.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
I've been following here so called retirement of the Warthog for some time ...
May 24, 2017
Feb 8, 2017

the latest is inside
Stayin’ alive: No retirement in sight for the A-10 and U-2
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now A-10 ‘Brrrts’ Another Retirement Volley: Here’s What’s Next
The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is a Cold War-era ground-attack plane known for its iconic gun designed to shred tanks and for its tough titanium armor designed to take hits and keep flying.

That durability is noticeable not only on the battlefield, but also increasingly on Capitol Hill, where supporters of the Thunderbolt II, popularly known as the Warthog or simply Hog, have seemingly succeeded in dissuading
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
officials from renewing attempts to retire the snub-nosed plane.

The Air Force’s fiscal 2018 budget request released this month calls for keeping its fleet of A-10s — which stood at 283 as of Sept. 30 — in service for at least five more years.

To recap: The service — facing financial pressure driven by spending caps known as sequestration — made multiple attempts in recent years to retire the Warthog to save an estimated $4 billion a year and to free up maintainers for the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the stealthy fifth-generation fighter jet designed to replace the A-10 and legacy fighters.

In 2016, then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced the A-10 retirement
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
until 2022 after lawmakers complained that doing so would rid the military of a “valuable and effective” close-air-support aircraft.

However, fiscal 2017 budget request documents showed the Air Force still planned to remove A-10 squadrons in increments between 2018 and 2022 to make room for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
squadrons coming online.

Members of Congress, notably Arizona Republicans Sen. John McCain, a former
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
pilot, and Rep. Martha McSally, who flew A-10s during her Air Force career, fiercely opposed the move, and included language in the bill that would prohibit retirement of the Warthog until the Air Force could prove the F-35 is able to perform similar missions as effectively on the battlefield.

In October, Air Force Materiel Command chief Gen. Ellen Pawlikowski
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the depot line for the A-10 was cranking back up as part of an effort to keep the Cold War-era aircraft flying “indefinitely.”

The planes, which entered service in 1976 and have
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to the Middle East, Europe and the Pacific, have played an outsized role in the air campaign that began in 2014 against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, helping provide close-air support for Iraqi and U.S. partner forces on the ground. (A-10 fans describe the distinctive sound its seven-barrel 30mm GAU-8 Avenger rotary cannon makes when firing as “brrrt.”)

So the retirement push appears to have dissipated — at least, for now.

Indeed, the Air Force’s budget request for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 includes modest funding for A-10 modifications in coming years. The service over the past decade worked with Boeing Co. to replace the wings on 173 of the aircraft as part of a program scheduled to wrap up this year.

For fiscal 2018, the service asked for $6 million in procurement funding to upgrade the A-10 with the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
known as the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast, or ADS-B, to comply with a Federal Aviation Administration rule for the new technology, according to budget documents.

In addition, the service requested $17.5 million in research and development funding to test the ADS-B Out software on the A-10 squadrons through 2022,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

This work “extends the viability and survivability” of the aircraft, according to an Air Force spokeswoman who spoke to Military.com on background because she wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the budget request. “As long as we can continue to fund these fleets, they will be survivable and lethal.”

Through the wing replacement program and maintenance work, the Air Force wants to preserve the longevity of the aircraft, potentially by doubling its life from 8,000 flight hours to 16,000 flight hours.

In an interview
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
earlier this year, then-Air Combat Commander Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle suggested new wings on the plane could keep it flying into the 2030s.

The spokeswoman couldn’t say whether this program would be expanded into future years.

“This is exactly why we need long-term budget stability and flexibility — no longer reacting to make tradeoff decisions year to year,” she said. “We’re not in the position right now, but we don’t know” what could happen next year.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Today at 6:05 AM
a hit:
‘Direct collision’ for US homeland missile defense interceptor test against ICBM target
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the most detailed account (which of course means almost zero details:) so far I found inside
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yesterday’s $244 million missile defense test didn’t just
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for the first time in the history of the system: It hit a cutting-edge IBCM modeled on future North Korean weapons, complete with decoys to confuse defenders.

“It actually replicated — without getting into classified details — an operational scenario that we’re concerned about,”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, currently at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
HQ in Colorado Springs, told reporters gathered here around a speaker phone. While the Missile Defense Agency director didn’t explicitly say the threat yesterday emulated a North Korean missile, he did say tests replicate threats “from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. In this case it was a Pacific scenario.” (Protip: Iran is not in the Pacific).

In fact, MDA tests against the intelligence community’s best estimate of where the North Korean and Iranian missile programs will be “three years” from now. “What we see in 2020…was very well replicated in the tests that we conducted yesterday,” Syring said.

That cutting-edge threat includes a high-performance target. “It flew at a higher altitude and a longer range and a higher velocity” than any target in previous tests, said Syring. It’s the first time the US missile defense system has actually been tested against a target with the performance characteristics of an ICBM, which is the threat that inspired its creation in the first place, three decades and at least 123 billion dollars ago.

The threat also included decoy warheads, splitting off from the rocket booster alongside the real one and designed to look as identical as possible on radar and infra-red. Adding just one decoy per live warhead doubles the number of interceptors defenders have to launch to ensure a kill — unless they can
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as they coast through the vacuum of space. This “discrimination” challenge is more demanding than detecting the missile launch in the first place, since the rocket’s red-hot exhaust is visible from orbit. Syring said this is not the first time MDA has tested the system against decoys and defeated them.

With a twinge of exasperation, Syring also refuted suggestions that the test was a set-up, with the defenders knowing exactly when to fire and where to aim. “The target absolutely does not have a homing beacon on it, despite what some have written,” he said. The missile defense system “was not notified when the target was launched,” instead having to rely on radars and satellites to detect the missile’s take-off and compute its path, just as they would in a real-war scenario.

The missile defense crews did know the test was happening yesterday and the rough time window when it would occur, Syring said, but such things have to be scheduled and made public well in advance for safety reasons: “We’re launching an interceptor hundreds of miles north of LAX (Los Angeles airport, to) Hawaii,” he said. “That requires us to shut down large parts of the ocean (to) ship traffic and air traffic.”

In a real-life attack, obviously, keeping Hawaii, Los Angeles, or Seattle from being obliterated would override the risk of a wayward interceptor hitting a jetliner or falling on a ship. The sensors involved would also be different, Syring acknowledged, but mainly because we have more sensors watching North Korea and the Western Pacific than we have in the peaceful Eastern Pacific where tests take place. Army
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Japan and Air Force radars in Clear, Alaska would play a major role against any incoming from North Korea, he said, whereas a target firing from the Kwajalein test site in the Marshall Islands is tracked instead by a lone TPY-2 on Wake and the Sea-Based X-band radar (SBX). That said, Syring emphasized, the system can detect the target and discriminate between warheads and decoys without using the SBX.

These
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
should help
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
stay ahead of the threat for at least a decade, just as the technology tested today is intended to defeat the threats of 2020. “I was confident before the test that we had the capability to defeat any threat that they would throw at us,” Syring said, “and I’m even more confident today.”
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

contains:
in BMD vids I like most the part when the control room starts to cheer but LOL it's not included in this vid
 
now I read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Thinking about robots and war often brings to mind HAL, the apparently well-meaning but ultimately destructive computer in 2001, or the metallic creatures of death in the Terminator series.

Today, however, the Pentagon wants to push the concept in a different direction.With advanced adversaries like Russia and China copying the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that were
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the Defense Department is urgently seeking a new technological edge. They think they’ve found a key part of it in AI, artificial intelligence.

The Pentagon wants to develop software that can
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from more sources than a human can, analyze it andeither
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
or — in high-speed situations like
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— act on its own with careful limits.

The War Algorithm

Call it the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Imagine the holy grail of a single mathematical equation designed to give the US military near-perfect understanding of what is happening on the battlefield, helping its human designers to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
than our adversaries and thus win our wars— or better yet, deter the enemy from attacking at all.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, helped make our case for the War Algorithm concept when he issued a memo containing the phrase “Algorithmic Warfare” in an April 26 memo. (We, of course, thought of our concept before Work did…)

Now, no one we’ve spoken with believes one equation can do everything in a war, but they all agree it’s a powerful concept for considering the risks and rewards of this new push by the Pentagon, because this is all about the intersection of mathematics and decision-making.

If you want to understand what practical effects this is having, look at anything the Pentagon labels part of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. In the last days of the Obama administration, Work and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
created aseries of offices to develop weapons for the joint force: the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the Rapid Capabilities offices each service has recently created,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, fondly known as the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Perhaps most importantly,watch the new unit created by Workin April.Known as the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, these will be the people trying to build the code. Its first effort? Developing Artificial Intelligence to sort through vast amounts of video collected by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Intelligence analysis is the logical starting point for military AI, given the sheer amount of data that leaves human analysts overwhelmed. Another important battlefront is cyberspace and the electromagnetic spectrum, where attacks can spread with speed and complexity that no human brain can follow. Visionaries call for AI cyber defenses that can instantly counter hacking attempts and for “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” that can sense an enemy radar pulse and immediately figure out how to jam it.

All these areas — intelligence, cyber, EW — involve electromagnetic signals, not physical bombs and bullets. That makes military officers less leery of letting AI act on its own. But there are similar high-speed, high-complexity challenges in the physical world, like missile defense, where humans might need to let AI pull the trigger.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, rather than missiles or viruses, is a bridge too far for most military thinkers in the US. Former Defense Secretary Ash Carter issued an explicit pledge that
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

At the highest level, there’s the military’s desire to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
across not only these high-tech fronts but also the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of land, air, sea and space, an overarching concept
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Such tremendous complexity beggars the human mind and begs for AI assistance.In the long term, a key to Multi-Domain Warfare will be the integration of the War Algorithm in combat forces.

We’ll be tearing apart the strengths and weaknesses of the War Algorithm and the various efforts to make it useful, and we’ll keep doing that as long as the concept remains potent. Look for our stories under the War Algorithm label. And, yes, Virginia, there will be an e-book.

Our first story in the series is by Sydney Freedberg.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
it.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
interestingly Pentagon Wants to Get Started on New Air Force Two and Doomsday Planes
The aging C-32 and E-4B may be replaced by similar aircraft, or at least with planes that share some gear.

After President Trump
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at the nascent effort to buy a new Air Force One, the Pentagon might be forgiven for soft-pedaling the launch of its effort to replace the four Boeing jetliners that serve as Air Force Two.

Tucked inside the Trump administration’s first federal budget request is $6 million to create a project office and start studies to determine what will replace the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the modified Boeing 757s that generally fly the vice president, other top-ranking cabinet officials, and members of Congress.

The plane is also occasionally used by the president to travel to airports whose smaller runways cannot handle the VC-25A, the Boeing 747 that usually bears the Air Force One callsign.

“The C-32A recap aircraft would be a more robust aircraft that would mitigate many capability gaps that exist when the current C-32A aircraft serve as a backup to VC-25A and [the new Air Force One],” the Air Force said in its budget request. “The C-32A replacement aircraft would have increased range, passenger capacity, enhanced senior leader communications and a private work space.”

The Pentagon wants to “better align” the new Air Force Two with its new Air Force One and another project to replace the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the so-called “Doomsday Plane,” a flying operations center that could be used by the president and defense secretary in a nuclear war. The defense secretary routinely flies on the E-4B when he travels overseas.

As well, Trump’s Pentagon budget also includes a $7.8 million request to begin work to merge the missions of the E-4B and Navy E-6 Mercury — another nuclear command plane — into a “uniformly-configured aircraft.” That new plane would be called the Survivable Airborne Operations Center.

The Doomsday Plane has been
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the E-6 has
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
since the early 1990s.

The Air Force has not said what plane it will buy, other than a “commercial derivative aircraft” — that is, a jetliner already in production. That rules out the 757. The most likely American-made C-32 replacement candidate is the Boeing 767, which the Air Force is buying for new tanker planes. While it is slightly longer than the 757, the 767 is a widebody aircraft, meaning it can carry more people and gear.

The C-32s have had their share of maintenance woes. In 2014, one
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
before the final flight of a nine-day
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by then-Secretary of State John Kerry. Two months later, his plane
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Vienna. Both times Kerry had to fly back to Washington commercially. In all, Kerry’s plane broke
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in 2014.

Boeing delivered all four C-32s to the Air Force in 1998, according to company data. The final 757 was delivered to Shanghai Airlines in April 2005. Since it’s been out of production for more than a decade, and fewer and fewer airlines operate the plane, getting parts for the jetliner becomes more difficult every year. In March 2016, the Air Force gave Boeing a $319 million
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to overhaul the C-32 and its smaller sibling — the C-40, the military version of the 737 — through 2023.

Aside from the glossy white-top-and-blue-belly paint jobs, the Air Force jets came with satellite communications and other high-tech gear. Inside, the plane is sectioned off into different cabins. The front section hosts crew workstations, a small private room with a couch and desk is in the middle, staff work areas behind that and more staff and flight attendant seats are in the back. While comfortable, the plane is not luxurious, a far cry from newer commercial airliners with lay-flat seats and private quarters.
source is DefenseOne
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
interestingly Pentagon Wants to Get Started on New Air Force Two and Doomsday Planes

source is DefenseOne
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Boeing did offer a 787 version for AF1 The 787 and 747-8 use a lot of the same technologies, The 747-8 in some ways is just a 787 in 747 skin. 787 was intended to replace the 767 in service. but on the other hand 767 is already in government service as the Boeing KC-46 Pegasus, also the USAF had previously studied the possibility of a Command version of the 767 in the Form of the Canceled E-10 a Boeing 767-400ER.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Did you know :)

July 14: The Thunderbirds will parade over the Champs-Elysées

In April 2017, as part of the PAF US Tour, to commemorate the centenary of the US entry into the First World War, the Thunderbirds and the PAF Made a common flight.

Three months later, these two demonstration patrols will be found in the air but this time in France, and more precisely in Paris over the Champs-Elysees, on the occasion of the national parade on 14 July.
Indeed, the rumor that runs now for several months has just confirmed with the publication of the official calendar of representations of the Thunderbirds.

The F-16Cs of the US Air Force, following the Alpha Jet tricolor, will march in formation over the capital in order to mark the close relations between France and the United States.

However, this passage by France will be rather short-lived as the following day, all the Thunderbirds (aircraft and support personnel) will fly to the United Kingdom to join the Royal International Air Tattoo on the airbase Of Fairford (Gloucestershire County).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Jan 9, 2017
this is very interesting:
Navy, GD Hit Crossroads in Destroyer Negotiations

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now Navy Pushes Back Schedule for Upgraded Destroyer Program; HII Set to Build First Flight III
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Navy has reached a tentative agreement with Huntington Ingalls Industries for the shipbuilder to build the first Flight III Arleigh Burke guided-missile destroyer (DDG-51) in its Mississippi yard, the Navy’s acting acquisition chief Allison Stiller told a House Armed Services panel last week.

The move from the Navy will push back the first ship to field a next-generation solid-state S-band radar and an upgraded combat suite designed to counter cruise and ballistic missiles and enemy aircraft simultaneously.

“We have a handshake agreement with Huntington Ingalls to introduce the Flight III capability on their FY ’17 ship,” Stiller told the House Armed Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee in a May 24 hearing.

As of last year, the Navy intended to include the Flight III configuration on a General Dynamics Bath Iron Works destroyer as part of a planned third Fiscal Year 2016 ship through an engineering change proposal (ECP). The Navy decided to award the third ship to BIW as part of a complex “swap ship” agreement with HII.

“The Navy intends to award the third FY16 DDG-51 ship to Bath Iron Works,” the service told USNI News last year.
“This corresponds to the December 2015 long lead time material contract award for LPD-28 to Huntington Ingalls and would be in addition to the currently contracted multiyear ships, subject to congressional authorization and appropriation.”

The update from Stiller on the Flight III program delay comes as the service has been in more than a year-long negotiation with shipbuilders HII and BIW over the ECPs that would modify a Flight IIA hull to include the Raytheon AN/SPY-6 air and missile defense radar as well as upgrade the electrical and cooling systems to accommodate the new systems.

“We’re also in negotiations with BIW to try and get a Flight III configuration on their FY 2017 ship, but we haven’t gotten to that point yet,“ Stiller told USNI News.

A spokesperson from HII referred comments to the Navy.

A BIW spokeswoman told USNI News on Wednesday, “we are actively working with the Navy on Flight III and swap ship contract negotiations. The history of Navy shipbuilding has shown significant risk to cost and schedule in starting construction when the design of the ship and ship systems is largely incomplete.”

In addition to the SPY-6, the changes to the design will increase the power available on the ship by replacing three Rolls Royce 3-megawatt generators on the Flight IIA ships with Rolls Royce’s 4-megawatt generator in the same footprint on the ship.

The electrical grid on the ship will also be upgraded from the 450-volt configuration to a 4,160-volt grid, which will lead to additional design changes.
 
drone1_website.png

LOL haven't heard of this thing yet
Stratolaunch Aircraft Makes First Rollout To Begin Fueling Tests
5/31/2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

We’re excited to announce that Stratolaunch aircraft has reached a major milestone in its journey toward providing convenient, reliable, and routine access to low Earth orbit. Today, we’re moving the Stratolaunch aircraft out of the hangar – for the first time ever – to conduct aircraft fueling tests. This marks the completion of the initial aircraft construction phase and the beginning of the aircraft ground and flight testing phase.

Over the past few weeks, we have removed the fabrication infrastructure, including the three-story scaffolding surrounding the aircraft, and rested the aircraft’s full weight on its 28 wheels for the first time. This was a crucial step in preparing the aircraft for ground testing, engine runs, taxi tests, and ultimately first flight.

Once we achieved weight-on-wheels, it enabled us to weigh the Stratolaunch aircraft for the first time, coming in at approximately 500,000 lbs. That may sound heavy, but remember that the Stratolaunch aircraft is the world’s largest plane by wingspan, measuring 385 ft. – by comparison, a National Football League field spans only 360 ft. The aircraft is 238 ft. from nose to tail and stands 50 ft. tall from the ground to the top of the vertical tail.

The Stratolaunch aircraft is designed for a max takeoff weight of 1,300,000 lbs., meaning it’s capable of carrying payloads up to approximately 550,000 lbs. As we announced
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, we will initially launch a single Orbital ATK Pegasus XL vehicle with the capability to launch up to three Pegasus vehicles in a single sortie mission. We have already started preparations for launch vehicle delivery to our Mojave facilities. We’re actively exploring a broad spectrum of launch vehicles that will enable us to provide more flexibility to customers.

Over the coming weeks and months, we’ll be actively conducting ground and flightline testing at the Mojave Air and Space Port. This is a first-of-its-kind aircraft, so we’re going to be diligent throughout testing and continue to prioritize the safety of our pilots, crew and staff. Stratolaunch is on track to perform its first launch demonstration as early as 2019.

This marks a historic step in our work to achieve Paul G. Allen’s vision of normalizing access to low Earth orbit. It is proud day for us at Stratolaunch, for our partners at Scaled Composites, and for our founder Paul Allen. We have a lot of exciting activity ahead as we enter the testing process, and we look forward to sharing our progress during the coming months.

Mr. Jean Floyd
Chief Executive Officer, Stratolaunch Systems Corporation
 
Top