US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
In past Sinktex It usually takes alot of fire power to actually sink the ship. Most Naval weapons are actually meant to just disable the ship or kill the crew. And it's not limited to the naval arena. Against any heavy vehicles the munitions used short of Nukes are only really meant to mission kill rather then total kill.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
F-35As at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho

We've been lucky to have seven F-35A at mountain Home AFB here in Idaho from the 61st Fighter Squadron from Luke Air Force Base near Phoenix Arizona. The main objective of the training has been to increase instructor pilots' skill in finding and destroying surface to air threats. Officials say Mountain Home Air Force Base provides them a great training opportunity thanks to their range in northern Nevada.

US Air Force said:
"One of the bread-and-butter missions of the F-35 is to locate and destroy surface to air threats on the ground. The range up here is world-class for that type of environment so we’re able to come up and have some world-class training up at Mountain Home," said Lieutenant Colonel Michael Gette commander of the 61st Fighter Squadron.

Many of you may remember me taking some of my grandsons to see the Gunfighter Skies Air SHow at Mountain home about two years ago at Mountain Home when they had a couple of F-35s here for show. I posted it here on SD:

https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/gunfighter-skies-2014-airshow.t7027/

Well, this is the real thing. These birds are IOC, and now this squadron is here bombing and blowing things up (particularly finding potential AAW sites) so they can go back and train many other F-35A pilots to do the same.

This post and the following two are pictures of these F-35As here in Idaho. On the last page are a couple of stills of them using precision guided munitions to hit a particular building within a group of buildings.

Great stuff!

F35A-Mountain-Home-AFB-01.jpg F35A-Mountain-Home-AFB-02.jpg F35A-Mountain-Home-AFB-03.jpg F35A-Mountain-Home-AFB-04.jpg F35A-Mountain-Home-AFB-05.jpg F35A-Mountain-Home-AFB-06.jpg
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
In past Sinktex It usually takes alot of fire power to actually sink the ship. Most Naval weapons are actually meant to just disable the ship or kill the crew. And it's not limited to the naval arena. Against any heavy vehicles the munitions used short of Nukes are only really meant to mission kill rather then total kill.

Naval ships are quite difficult to sink. Targeted practice vessels are exponentially harder because you want it to last as long as possible as to not 'waste' it on the first blow unless it was specifically designated to be targeted by a new powerful missile or something.

In the case of this sinkex it appears that it was more for target practice than it was to test the effectiveness of a new weapon etc. Bear in mind also that these ships have been drained of all fuel, ammo and anything inflammable. All hatches shut and compartment watertight. In real life, catastrophic events often happened because a 'lucky' bomb or missile hit critical areas, fuel, stored munitions etc.

Torpedoes are of course a different beast alltogether! Mainly because it hits below the waterline and has much more potent blast. Same with hypersonic Ashm! I like to see a video of a ship hit by new generation missile like the crazy fast Mach 6 Zircon!
 
In past Sinktex It usually takes alot of fire power to actually sink the ship. Most Naval weapons are actually meant to just disable the ship or kill the crew. And it's not limited to the naval arena. Against any heavy vehicles the munitions used short of Nukes are only really meant to mission kill rather then total kill.

Mar 9, 2016
... I think there are three ways how a 4000 t displacing warship can be sent under:
  1. pluck a rather big hole below the waterline (for example an Otomat AShM goes for it)
  2. set on the fire (hitting the superstructure, for example an Exocet goes for it) to cause secondary explosions
  3. demolition men visit first :)
...
... apparently in was option #4 this time LOL
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Eastern Shipbuilding Group Selected to Build United States Coast Guard Offshore Patrol Cutters
hx4Z3Db.jpg

After conducting a thorough evaluation of proposals submitted by competing shipyards, the U.S. Coast Guard has awarded the largest vessel procurement contract in Coast Guard history to Eastern Shipbuilding Group in Panama City, Florida. Eastern Shipbuilding Group was selected to finalize its design and construct the first series of Nine Offshore Patrol Cutters to replace the Medium Endurance Cutters currently in service. The contract is initially for Nine vessels with options for Two additional vessels. The Coast Guard program goal is to build Twenty Five Offshore Patrol Cutters having a potential total contract value in excess of Ten billion dollars. Initially, Eastern has been awarded the detail design effort with a value of approximately One Hundred Ten million dollars. Construction of the first vessel is expected to commence in 2018.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

SouthernSky

Junior Member
US Navy orders two Austal ships for $434m.

UPDATE 2.35pm: The US Navy has awarded Austal a $434 million contract to build another two high-speed troop carriers.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Video
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The order to design and construct the expeditionary fast transport vessels at Austal’s Alabama shipyard includes a previously announced contract for long lead-time materials.

The order comes on top of a 10-ship contract the WA company won in 2008 for the 103m catamarans, formerly called joint high speed vessels.

It brings the value of Austal’s 12-ship EPF program to $US1.9 billion ($2.5 billion), and extends its US production schedule to 2022. Seven of the vessels have been delivered.

Chief executive David Singleton said the new order reflected the US Navy’s continued confidence and investment in a proven product.

57db7a777a95f_b88248934z.1_20160916124552_000_ga8mo4le.3_1-1btmujn.jpg

One of Austal's expeditionary fast transport vessels conducting sea trials.
“The EPF is a unique vessel that is re-defining naval sealift capability and exceeding expectations in various military and civilian operations around the world,” Mr Singleton said.

“Two more EPF signal a commitment by the US Navy to further expand the EPF roles and reach.”

The ships are designed to transport about 300 troops as well as vehicles and cargo, travelling at 35 knots. It has an 1800 square metre cargo deck and a medium-lift helicopter deck.

Austal’s shares were off three cents, or 1.93 per cent, to $1.525 at the close.

Source

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

SouthernSky

Junior Member
A comparison of apples and oranges there Forbin.

After watching an F-16 aerial display here in Australia quite a few years ago, and it being the first time I had seen one flown, I was quite struck at how agile they are in flight.
 
Top