US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

An F-16 Fighting Falcon, assigned to the 64th Aggressor Squadron, with the new “splinter” paint scheme sits in the U.S. Air Force Thunderbird hangar at Nellis Air Force Base

...

“This is the first F-16 Aggressor with the newest scheme and we are working on a second ‘shark’ scheme

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Click to expand...

Jura said:

USAF Air Combat Command chief skeptical over new aircraft for permissive environments

source:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Click to expand...

Roll the clock back six years to 2010. The US Air Force had just shelved a proposal to stand up a new wing of fighters based on the OA-X, a concept for a propeller-driven, light-attack fighter – reviving the role played by the Vietnam-era Douglas A-1 Skyraider.


Instead, the USAF would acquire OA-X aircraft on behalf of cash-poor partners, and let them operate the type. If the concept proved useful to those nations, service officials said they would reconsider the merits of standing up a light-attack wing.

Six years later, the Sierra Nevada/Embraer A-29 Super Tucano has made its combat debut with the Afghan air force (below). As expected, the OA-X concept was dusted off and re-studied. In late July, interest grew after a private USAF briefing to leading defence analysts suggested a light-attack fighter acquisition was back on the table.

In fact, it was only a mirage. In remarks to reporters on 2 August, Air Combat Command chief Gen Herbert Carlisle made it clear that he has no more intention of acquiring a light-attack fleet than any of his modern predecessors. In Carlisle’s view, one dollar spent on light attack is one less the USAF can apply to higher priorities, such as the Lockheed Martin F-35A and Northrop Grumman B-21.

Of course, the Department of Defense launched the F-35A in 2001 expecting the fighter to be available for combat in 2011 and cost an average of $40 million, or $54 million if adjusted for inflation. Upon the declaration of initial operational capability on 2 August, the F-35A is projected to cost an average of $106 million, and that assumes Lockheed can drive that figure down to $85 million on a unit basis as production ramps up.

So it is no wonder that Carlisle is hoarding every dollar to replace a combination of nearly 2,000 Lockheed F-16s, Boeing F-15Es and Fairchild Republic A-10s with 1,763 F-35As over the next 20 years.

That does not mean, however, that there is no place for light-attack capability in a modern air force. Even in its current limited state, the stealth and speed of an F-35A is wildly out of place in combat against Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Islamic State targets.

A light-attack platform would be more vulnerable to ground fire than the Joint Strike Fighter, but still far more survivable than the utility and cargo helicopters that regularly fly in such airspace.

A Super Tucano costs one-tenth of an F-35A and a whole OA-X squadron costs the equivalent of two of the fifth-generation type; good value, in other words.

Click to expand...

Jura said:

LOL "Asked whether the UCA funding signified that LRIP 9 and 10 negotiations will continue to drag on, DellaVedova demurred.

“We want to ensure the continued production of F-35s while we continue to negotiate a fair deal,” he said."
Pentagon Grants Lockheed About $1B To Stem F-35 Lot 9 Production Costs

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Click to expand...

TerraN_EmpirE said:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

might not even need to send the minisub all the way into a enemy shoreline Jeff.

Click to expand...

Although Patriot3 could not disclose which combat units use Jetboots, it says more than 600 systems have been deployed around the globe and that US Special Operations Command is a customer.

Click to expand...

Blackstone said:

That's because the PLA is a private security force, (think ultra high-end rent-a-cops) and not a national army. It's loyalty is to the Communist Party and not to the Chinese people.

Click to expand...

Blackstone said:

...
It's loyalty is to the Communist Party and not to the Chinese people.

Click to expand...

Blackstone said:

Oh they're a private army alright, its public funding is proof the Chinese people are paying for their own oppression.

Click to expand...

Blackstone said:

Oh they're a private army alright, its public funding is proof the Chinese people are paying for their own oppression.

Click to expand...