US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator

Congratulations on Poster of the Month, is this your new "persona" here on SDF, perpetual winner! LOL I must say that all of your posts are well thought, and well spoken, even though with our language barrier, it sometimes requires the AFB to "get inside your head" for an accurate translation. It often seems that we are broadcasting on the same wave length, and I do look forward to your next, "in the cockpit" interpretation, LOL! good work Master Forbin, very good work, and thanks for all you add to our Sino Defense University curriculum! +1 Bubba!
 
Congratulations on Poster of the Month, is this your new "persona" here on SDF, perpetual winner! LOL I must say that all of your posts are well thought, and well spoken, even though with our language barrier, it sometimes requires the AFB to "get inside your head" for an accurate translation. It often seems that we are broadcasting on the same wave length, and I do look forward to your next, "in the cockpit" interpretation, LOL! good work Master Forbin, very good work, and thanks for all you add to our Sino Defense University curriculum! +1 Bubba!
yeah FORBIN is a Big Shrimp LOL!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Congratulations on Poster of the Month, is this your new "persona" here on SDF, perpetual winner! LOL I must say that all of your posts are well thought, and well spoken, even though with our language barrier, it sometimes requires the AFB to "get inside your head" for an accurate translation. It often seems that we are broadcasting on the same wave length, and I do look forward to your next, "in the cockpit" interpretation, LOL! good work Master Forbin, very good work, and thanks for all you add to our Sino Defense University curriculum! +1 Bubba!

yeah FORBIN is a Big Shrimp LOL!
Merci :)

Yes Sir, he certainly is classy, and smart, always a nice combination!
:eek: :cool:
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
US Presidential Helo Moves to Production Phase
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Defense News3:17 p.m. EDT July 25, 2016
Critical Design Review Is Successful

WASHINGTON – The VH-92A Presidential Helicopter Replacement Program successfully passed a major Pentagon test, Lockheed Martin’s Sikorsky subsidiary announced today, with completion of a Critical Design Review (CDR). The milestone means the manufacturing and assembly of the helicopters can take place.

The joint Sikorsky/Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) VH-92A helicopter program team met in July with key collaborators from government and industry for the in-depth design review, Lockheed said in a statement.

Sikorsky is working under a $1.24 billion US Navy fixed-price incentive Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contract awarded in May 2014 to produce two test aircraft and 21 operational helicopters. The new helos will replace older VH-3D and VH-60N helicopters in the presidential fleet, which is operated by the Marine Corps.

“The successful CDR demonstrates this helicopter system meets the requirements of the [Marine Corps] and gives them exceptional mission performance from a platform that is affordable and supportable for this important mission," Marine Corps Col. Robert Pridgen, program manager for NAVAIR’s Presidential Helicopter Program Office, said in the statement.

The test aircraft, Lockheed said, are undergoing “the modification process” at Sikorsky’s Stratford, Connecticut plant. The first flight of a VH-92A is expected to take place in 2017, with all aircraft in service by fiscal 2023.

The VH-92A is based on Sikorsky’s S-92 helicopter. The program passed its Milestone B review in March 2014
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
first I pull this from F-35 Thread
Thursday at 5:48 PM
interestingly Air Force Can’t Afford F-35 But Wants a ‘Super’ A-10?

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and now
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Air Force is considering not one, but two
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
close air support plane. But analysts wonder why, given that the service is already building a new bomber (the B-21), a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, they would want to build two Close Air Support aircraft in an era when trillion dollar deficits are once again on the horizon?

The news comes from what appears to be an increasingly common tactic at the Pentagon, where think tank types get briefed on news before the news media. And then it leaks, as, one assumes, the Pentagon intends.

In this case, Lt. Gen. Mike Holmes, the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for strategic plans and requirements, told a gaggle of think tank types last Wednesday that the service is considering buying two Close Air Support aircraft:

  1. The OA-X would be a buy of 250 prop-driven aircraft for “permissive” environments. The two planes that appear to be in contention are the
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    and the
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    since they meet the criteria of being off-the-shelf aircraft, which Holmes stressed as a requirement for this plane. Textron’s intriguing Scorpion, which has been touted as a possible CAS aircraft, is non-developmental so it wouldn’t be considered for the OA-X.
  2. But the other aircraft, the A-X2, would be designed to fly in the face of higher-tech opposition in the form of surface-to-air missiles and other opposition, but not the high-end threats known as
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    systems. (A2/AD would be the purview of the F-35 and other fifth-generation aircraft). The Scorpion could be considered for this. The Marines, who are writing the Close Air Support doctrine for the F-35, have praised its CAS performance so far. That said, the plane won’t have its most advanced weapons for CAS, such as the Small Diameter Bomb II, until the Block 4 software.
Still, the question arises: since the F-35A is intended to replace the A-10 for Close Air Support, why does the Air Force need another CAS asset?

The answer appears to be that the less advanced aircraft would have longer loiter times, allowing them to provide more persistent CAS. And they help the Air Force lower its flight hour costs, allowing them to boast higher readiness rates over time for much less money, according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, one of the think tank analysts who was briefed by Gen. Holmes.

Gunzinger, an analyst with the respected Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, said “my personal opinion is the Air Force ought to try and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,” because we’ve got it now and it provides such superb service. His view may also reflect the skepticism of many Air Force watchers about the costs of A-10 flight hours cited by the service.

Buying these other CAS aircraft would provide the Air Force, already fielding the smallest and oldest air fleet in its history, with more cockpits to provide pilots with flying hours and the ability to hone their skills, Gunzinger and defense consultant Loren Thompson say.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a fervent supporter of the A-10, has not spoken on the Air Force plans yet. Part of the reason is surely that she is locked in a very tight race for her seat in New Hampshire, though the Cook Report notes “that private polling shows Ayotte with a small but steady lead” over Democratic Gov. Maggie Hassan. Should Ayotte win we can be sure she would lean in to some effect on this issue.

No money has yet been placed in the Program Objective Memorandum (POM), which is largely shaped already — though major decisions may well be made into the new year, depending on how the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
turn out.

In the meantime, the Air Force clearly is floating these
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to see how they, um, fly.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
the A-X2, would be designed to fly in the face of higher-tech opposition in the form of surface-to-air missiles and other opposition, but not the high-end threats known as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
systems. (A2/AD would be the purview of the F-35 and other fifth-generation aircraft).

Close attack missions are hard and deadly, In the Gulf Smaller numbers of A10 flew sorties then say F16's doing the same missions yet the A10's took far more losses.
With the Advent of Precision guided weapons the needs have changed and getting down into the weeds is less a need meaning that less armored platforms are more relevant.
This is why Rather then pushing for A10 or SU25 type Aircraft The new CAS platforms are based on lighter long endurance turboprops like the A29, jets like the Scorpion Areas where the mission aim is one part patrol one part attack. If you look at the Scorpion most of it's payload is sensor based as opposed to the A10 which was built around a main gun.

Although I love what the A10 offers It's key liability is that it's placed in a position where it is more and more likely to result in the loss of a Pilot behind enemy lines.

By having stand off range of precision weapons and Stealth platforms like the F35 offer a more relevant attack platform but at the price of loiter and limitations of budget as well as just sometimes lack of need. If the US were operating in a Allied assistance role like Iraq or Syria running missions against Asymmetric threats using super sonic stealth platforms is well.. over kill. I mean if the mission is just dropping a couple JDAMS on some Toyota pickups loaded with Jihadis Do you need to bring in such a platform?

What this article is really talking about here is more of A mission set needed for a lower low end machine Not a "Super A10" Not even really a replacement for the A10 but something more like the old Cessna A-37 Dragonfly or the North American Rockwell OV-10 Bronco. This could indicate a shift in the DOD Thinking to a flexible force with the USAF thinking about having conventional Air force elements with F22, F35, B21 for use against pier to near pier foes and COIN elements for Dropping bombs on ISIS and the like or even for use after the breakdown of enemy command and control.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
USS George H.W. Bush departs from Naval Station Norfolk

PORTSMOUTH, Va. (NNS) — USS George H. W. Bush (CVN 77) left Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY) July 23 after completing a 13-month planned incremental availability (PIA).

GHWB will conduct sea trials in collaboration with NNSY to evaluate sailors’ performance and ensure the operability of ship equipment and systems.

“Sea trials are exciting and the culmination of an enormous effort on the part of our crew and our shipyard and contracting partners,” said Capt. Will Pennington, commanding officer of USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77). “I’m very proud of our entire PIA team for their hard work and dedication. I have no doubt the testing and evaluation will be successful and our crew is eager to return this great ship to operational service and get back in the fight.”

Sea trials will test ship equipment that supports surface operations, flight deck evolutions, deck seamanship and damage control readiness through various drills and system checks. This includes high-speed turns, aqueous film forming foam tests on the flight deck and hangar bays, anchor drop testing, and sea and anchor drills.

“The ship itself is an innovative piece of machinery, but it’s the Sailors that give it life,” said GHWB Command Master Chief Huben Phillips. “The many man-hours that went into PIA have brought us to this point. Now the crew will put those efforts to good use and begin the task of getting us back to our primary mission.”

Norfolk Naval Shipyard Commander Capt. Scott Brown said he truly appreciates the combined efforts supporting GHWB’s planned incremental availability during the past year.

“It’s your efforts that have enabled us to deliver this national asset back to the fleet,” said Brown.

“The crew is chomping at the bit to get out of the yards and back into the operational environment,” said GHWB Navigator Cdr. Marc Christino. “You can see it walking around the ship. There is an excitement in the air about getting back to sea.”

The end of sea trials will mark GHWB’s successful completion of PIA and the crew will return to its homeport of Norfolk, Virginia, to enter its training and qualification cycle in preparation for a 2017 deployment.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top