US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
For example, the Navy has maintained a deployed presence of about 100 ships consistently since 1998
Main problem for number only 4 LCS frigates they should have kept for at least two/three years about 10/20 Perry waiting LCS ramp up.

They have 84 powerful MCS but they can not be everywhere they have need others ships for patrol also if necessary escort convoys etc... with about 4 new LCS/year not before 2018/19 they have a decent number but not enough armed ( actually only good for ASW with 2 MH-60R after mainly for minor threats not sufficient ) up to futur variant come in number necessary minimum 20 idealy stop first LCS to 24 and build 28/31 new FFG.
 
... LCS ... ( actually only good for ASW with 2 MH-60R after mainly for minor threats not sufficient ) ...
... I've most recently read waterjets are too noisy for ASW, could even post where, but I feel I've criticised LCS enough times already :) so time will tell

this is very interesting: Navy Finalizing Virginia Payload Module Design, Will Begin Prototyping To Reduce Risk
The Virginia-class submarine program is finalizing the Virginia Payload Module design and will start prototyping soon to reduce risk and cost as much as possible ahead of the 2019 construction start, according to a Navy report to Congress.

According to the “Virginia Class Submarine Cost Containment Strategy for Block V Virginia Payload Module Design” report, dated Aug. 31 but not received by the Senate until mid-October, the Navy says late Fiscal Year 2015 and early FY 2016 is a “critical” time period for the program.

“Since the previous report (in early 2015), the Design Agent (General Dynamics Electric Boat (GDEB)) finalized the concept design, reviewed and started updating the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), issued a prototype plan, commenced arrangement activities, and submitted all ship specification requirements and Key Decisions for approval,” the report states.
“In the remainder of FY15 and into FY16 GDEB will recommend a final module length, issue IMS Revision B, update cost estimates, complete payload tube arrangements, and begin prototyping efforts. The Navy will approve all Key Decisions and ship specification changes, commence module and host ship arrangement approvals, start approving design disclosures, and establish the module length.”

The Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and has, with Electric Boat, been refining that design ever since. This early risk-reduction work proved important in the Virginia-class submarine program, which has minimized requirements and cost creep throughout the 20-year history of the program, and officials are trying to replicate that success in the VPM project, according to the report.

“There have been no changes to the CDD (capability development document) since it was initially approved in December 2013. The CDD sets clear KPPs (key performance parameters) for cost, strike capability, and schedule based on stable requirements,” reads the report.

The VPM project has the advantage of not relying on the development of any new technology to meet Navy requirements, and therefore the design should be at a high level of completion when construction starts, the report notes. That high level of design completion, in addition to minimizing rework and keeping cost and risk low, means the Navy will be able to give GDEB “sufficient time to acquire material, develop and issue work packages, and prepare for construction.”

The design has not been finalized yet, but GDEB has submitted its recommendations for all 39 “key decisions,” and the Navy has approved 16 of them. The service has also tested out the design in a lab setting to ensure it will work well with the Virginia subs and their own set of requirements. The Navy held a VPM Strike Concept of Operations Exercise (COOPEX) in June 2015 at Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Newport to provide feedback early in the systems engineering process “to understand if conceptual configurations efficiently meet future VPM mission requirements.

“COOPEX identified operational impacts of the current concept design and the results will help determine necessary changes or modifications to design, requirements, or Concept of Operations (CONOPS) for more effective system and crew performance in order to meet current KPPs and KSAs (Key System Attributes) and to maintain existing Block III (submarine) manning. “

The Naval Sea Systems Command’s (NAVSEA) engineering directorate will update cost estimates soon based on the final concept design, but so far the program has been successful in sticking to its cost goals. The program had a threshold requirement of $994 million and an objective requirement of $931 million in non-recurring engineering costs, and as of January 2015 the program estimated it would end up spending $936 million. The first VPM module is required to cost $633 million with an objective cost of $567 million, and the most recent estimate puts the lead ship VPM at $563 million. Follow-on VPMs would be required to cost $567 million each with an objective cost of $527 million, and the January estimate puts them at an even lower $508 million.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Anti-ship missile news

The future one
U.S. Navy Started AGM-158C LRASM Anti-Ship Missile Flight Tests on F/A-18E/F Super Hornet
The U.S. Navy began initial flight testing of its Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) with a F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Nov. 3 at Patuxent River’s Air Test and Evaluation Squadron (VX) 23 facility.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


And the "old" one
U.S. Navy Completes Flight Test of New Network-Enabled AGM-84N Harpoon Block II+ Missile
The U.S. Navy completed a free-flight test of the new network-enabled Harpoon missile system Nov. 18 at the Sea Range at Point Mugu, California. Building on the nearly 40-year legacy of the Harpoon, the upgraded missile, known as AGM-84N Harpoon Block II+, will have the ability to receive in-flight updates that improve the targeting and engagement of moving maritime targets.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Marine Corps Awards Amphibious Combat Vehicle 1.1 Contracts to BAE Systems and SAIC
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

November 24, 2015 5:13 PM • Updated: November 24, 2015 5:49 PM
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


BAE Systems’ Amphibious Combat Vehicle 1.1 entrant. BAE Systems photo.

The Marine Corps selected
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to move into the engineering and manufacturing development phase of the Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 Increment 1 (ACV 1.1) program, the service announced Tuesday.

The two companies were selected from five competitors, and each was awarded a contract to build 13 vehicles now, with an option to build three additional vehicles each at a later date. BAE Systems’ contract is for $103.8 million, while SAIC’s is for $121.5 million.

Vehicle delivery is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2016, with testing starting around January 2017 and lasting about a year.

Program Executive Officer for Land Systems William Taylor told reporters Tuesday ahead of the contract award that the two winners are “companies who clearly offer the best value selections for the Marine Corps’ ACV 1.1 program.” He praised government-industry collaboration over the duration of this program and its predecessor, the Marine Personnel Carrier, which he says “energized competition and challenged industry to up their game.”

Program Manager for Advanced Amphibious Assault John Garner said that the swim capability of the vehicles in particular has improved over the last year in large part due to internal research and development investment by the ACV 1.1 competitors.

“The net result is, we made a selection of very capable vehicles at what we consider to be an affordable price for the Marine Corps,” he said.
“So it’s been a great success story for us in that over the last year the capabilities that were offered to us have increased dramatically and the pricing has gone down significantly, so we think we’re in a very good place and we were able to make a very solid best-value decision.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

TERREX 2, SAIC’s ACV 1.1 vehicle, completes swim test in Charleston, South Carolina. Photo courtesy SAIC.

Garner explained that the Marine Corps valued swim operations, land operations, carrying capability and force protection equally in the selection process. However, he said there were emphasis areas – which essentially award “extra credit” in the event that two competitors meet stated requirements equally – and the emphasis areas focused primarily on amphibious swim capability. Many wheeled vehicles perform well on various ground terrains, he said, and the final ACV selection will be as capable as any other ground vehicle, but “fundamentally this vehicle has to be an amphibious vehicle,” he said.

The ACV 1.1 is not required to self-deploy from the well deck of an amphibious ship to the shore, since the Marine Corps decided to wait and introduce that requirement into ACV 1.2, which will also feature mission-based variants of the vehicle. However, Taylor said he is confident that BAE Systems and SAIC will be able to self-deploy, eliminating their reliance on the Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) and Landing Craft Utility (LCU) fleets. Having an ACV 1.1 that can self-deploy also makes the ACV 1.2 effort that much easier and less risky, as the physical ability to drop into the water from the ship without flipping over and then pull itself back into the ship’s well deck is a real challenge, Taylor and Garner said.

Part of the success of the program has been the streamlined transition from MPC to ACV 1.1 and eventually into 1.2, the officials said. The Marines built a tech demonstrator for MPC when they weren’t happy with industry’s original technology level, Garner said. The test demonstrator informed the initial requirements for MPC, MPC testing informed the ACV 1.1 requirements, and the ACV 1.1 testing in 2017 will inform the ACV 1.2 requirements. Taylor said a draft of the ACV 1.2 capability development document will be ready by the time ACV 1.1 testing begins, and the draft CDD will be updated as testing goes on and lessons are learned about the state of technology.

In addition to the flow of one test event informing the requirements of the next program, the Marine Corps and Defense Department have taken several steps to shorten the acquisition program to save time and money. For example, defense acquisition chief Frank Kendall counted the Marine Corps’ work on the MPC program as meeting the competitive prototyping requirements for ACV, which allowed the ACV program to start at Milestone B instead of Milestone A, Taylor said. This is one of several examples of “knocking down acquisition barriers that will have the net effect of removing years of unnecessary schedule and program cost,” he said.

Garner agreed, saying that “the ability to bypass the technology demonstration phase and enter at Milestone B is probably the most significant element of being able to streamline and move out on the program.”

Additional timesavers, Garner said, include the parallel efforts that will take place during the program’s test schedule. The Marines will buy 13 test vehicles from each company now and three later – the current continuing resolution the government is operating under caps the program’s funding, and the remaining vehicles will be purchased when the Marine Corps is allowed to spend more money on the ACV program.

Buying 16 of each variant “allows us to shorten the test period by doing a lot of the testing in parallel by having extra vehicles. If for whatever reason we have a catastrophic failure of a vehicle, we don’t lose time to repair that vehicle, we can throw another one in the test,” Garner said.

“And additionally we’ll start working the tactics, techniques and procedures with the Marines as to how they’re going to use these vehicles so that by the time we come to the operational assessment in late 2017 … the Marines will have already learned how they’re going to operate these vehicles. So the buying of 16 from each company is critical to our maintaining the schedule and doing testing in parallel and ultimately getting to a downselect from two companies to one and a low-rate production decision in the late spring, early summer of 2018.”

After the 2018 downselect, initial operational capability should be declared in 2020. All 204 ACV 1.1 vehicles will be delivered and in the operating force by the summer of 2023, according to a Marine Corps statement.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BAE Systems Based on Italian Iveco SUPERAV In Italian Service. Offers Similar speed and Range to existing AAV but with better armor package with smaller personal capacity
SAIC joint Singapore ST Engineering and Timoney Technology Limited of Ireland ( Helped Design the Terrex and the Tiwanese CM series of 8x8 Armored Vehicles ) Terrex II. Again similar performance to AAV in a smaller but better armored package.

Remember the main goals of this program are not a total replacement of the AAV7A1, Infact a number of the AAV's are to undergo reset, but to replace the LAV-25 series and moste of the AAV7A1. However a number of AAV7A1 will continue in Marine service for a period of time as Logistics vehicles well the ACV takes the role of APC/IFV.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
mpdBS5F.jpg

Talk about letting off steam! A low-flying F-15 jet generates a vapour cloud as it roars down a valley in Snowdonia in north Wales. The photo was taken by freelance photographer Bob Sharples who is a retired Royal Navy aircraft weapons electrician.
Picture: BOB SHARPLES / CATERS NEWS


Back to bottling my Grenache
 
getasset.aspx
this is interesting:
Vintage Boeing B-52 gets new long-range Lockheed cruise missile
The Boeing B-52H is the vintage bomber that just won’t quit, and now the Cold War-era “Stratofortress” is being outfitted with one of America’s newest and longest-range conventional cruise missiles.

Lockheed Martin has been put on contract to arm the 54-year-old aircraft – which has outlived many of those who predicted its retirement – with the extended-range Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Weapon (JASSM) under a $9.1 million contract announced earlier this month.

In a statement to Flightglobal, LM director of long-range strike systems Jason Denney confirms that the B-52 will be updated to carry the turbofan engine-powered cruise missile internally on a new digitised rotary launcher and externally on its pylons.

The bomber has long carried conventional cruise missiles, namely the non-nuclear derivative of the AGM-86 “ALCM” that has an unclassified range of 600nm and is being retired as supplies run low.

Already equipped to carry the shorter-range baseline JASSM missile on its pylons, adding the extended range variant more than doubles the bomber’s JASSM strike distance to 500nm (926km). That allows lumbering, non-stealthy B-52H to punch out targets while keeping clear of hazardous air defence systems well into the future.

According to Lockheed, the B-52 has only ever captive-carried the JASSM-ER during operational testing, and the bomber now joins the Lockheed F-16 and soon the Boeing F-15E on the integration to-do list. The weapon is already deployed on the Boeing/Rockwell B-1B. B-52 integration will wrap up in 2018, as will the project to arm the F-16.

“F-15E integration will be next in line,” says Denney. “The expansion of the JASSM-ER employment aircraft set will significantly enhance the US warfighter’s first-day, first-strike capabilities.”

The beefing up of Stratofortress weaponry for conventional warfighting comes as the air force removes nuclear weapons from dozens of B-52s previously assigned to the strategic deterrence mission to achieve compliance with new strategic arms limitations agreed with Russia.

The air force currently plans to retire the supersonic B-1B and the B-52H in the 2040s as their Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) replacement steps in.

JASSM-ER takes advantage of several concurrent digital upgrades that will allow every B-52 to carry smart weapons internally for the first time and on its pylons. The Boeing-led Combat Network Communications Technology improvement will further allow B-52s to update their missions plans via satellite and retarget weapons in flight – as most other combat aircraft have been doing for decades.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


USS-Stethem-Joins-PLA-Navy-for-Drills-in-East-China-Sea-1024x683.jpg

Naval Today said:
The U.S. Navy’s destroyer USS Stethem teamed with People’s Liberation Army-Navy PLA(N) guided-missile frigate Xuzhou (FFG 530) to practice the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES) and conduct a search-and-rescue (SAR) exercise on November 20.

The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile ship, Stethem (DDG 63) concluded a scheduled port visit to PLA(N) East Sea Fleet of Shanghai that same day, where crew members of both ships took part in cultural exchanges, ship tours and receptions.

Lieutenant Erika Betancourt, Stethem’s operations officer, said:

This is our second visit to China in three months, the strides we have made in our partnership and operational cooperation improve both our ability to conduct exercises and our interactions at sea.

CUES, a set of procedures endorsed by naval leaders at the Western Pacific Naval Symposium in April 2014, is a guideline for unplanned maritime encounters while at sea, providing standards for communication, safety procedures, and maneuvering instructions for naval ships and aircraft.

Stethem and Xuzhou rendezvoused and used CUES as a signaling protocol to indicate ship maneuvering, and passed Morse code to one another.

In the later course of the exercise, Xuzhou dropped a search-and-rescue dummy in the water, which was then retrieved by one of Stethem’s small boats.
Despite what some folks and news outlets want to try and push...such exercises as these...and occurring in the ECS no less, not far removed from the SCS...tell me that things are not nearly so hot or confrontational as some believe.

These are very positive signs.

As I have said numerous times...short of something extremely foolish happening on either side...the PRC will continue improving its holdings/reefs/shoals in the SCS, and the US will make its FON point, and things will proceed forward.

the PRC's position and presence in the SCS with the new islands is simply the new normal now.
 
have you heard yet?
The US Military Just Ditched Plans to Launch Satellites with F-15s
DARPA was looking for a way to get small sats into orbit more quickly, but the fuel proved too dangerous.

The US military research lab that funds some of the most important (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) scientific work out there is scrapping a program that would have launched satellites with fighter jets, after the next-generation rocket fuel involved turned out to be a little too explosive.

DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, had tasked contractors at Orbital ATK and Boeing to help it develop a system to launch small satellites with 24 hours notice for less than $1 million.

The team
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
utilizing a new propellant called NA-7 and designed to be launched from the bottom of an F-15 jet fighter. It hopes to test the program, called Airborne Launch Assist Space Access (ALASA), multiple times in 2016.

But unmanned tests conducted this year revealed a problem with the new, high-powered fuel, which attempts to combine in one fluid the two components in liquid rocket engines—an oxidizer and the fuel itself, typically liquid oxygen and a kind of high-grade kerosene. Two on-the-ground tests of the new fuel resulted in explosions, according to officials
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and the substance was determined to be too volatile to be carried by a piloted plane.

“From a performance standpoint it’s still great but from a safety standpoint you have to work that out,” Brad Tousley, who supervises the program for DARPA, told Space News. “As of present, we’ve stopped planning for any launches.”

The team behind the research intends to keep developing the propellant, possibly for ground-based launches. A unified rocket fuel would simplify the incredibly complex plumbing inside of a rocket engine, but the reason why engineers have typically separated the two components has become apparent in these tests.

Efforts to rapidly launch small satellites on the cheap won’t end here, though, as governments and private companies alike seek to enhance satellite development by making rapid prototyping possible. Creating more flexibility for satellite operators at a time when launches take months, if not years, of planning remains an important goal.

Another promising effort comes from Rocket Labs,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a key component in rocket engines, the turbopump, in a bid to create a more efficient engine. The company hopes to test its rocket in 2016 and begin a low-cost, high-tempo small satellite launch business by 2017.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top