US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The AB1 reactor alone saves, every 20 years a Nimitz class carrier has to have its two A4W reactors refueled, the cost of such for the Last one refueled was 10 Billion dollars on the USS George Washington. The Gerald Ford class uses the newer AB1 nuclear reactor who's core has a 50 year life span IE the life of the Hull. That's 20 Billion dollars need never be spent. The reduction in crew is supposed to save another 4 billion. Your estimated is what 14-15 Billion that means a savings of 9-10 Billion over the life of the hull.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
... also LOL but I think there's no point in blaming "bean counters" (now I don't mean Brumby LOL) for unfulfilled promises made by any Weapons Program ... what I noticed is American Weapons Programs often make so many soooo optimistic headlines ... until they're threatened by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


EDIT
I remember I posted about what the Acquisitions Chief said about optimism; it's here:
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/us-military-news-reports-data-etc.t1547/page-419#post-348019

So you did have Ham and Beans, when you lived in the south? Nothing to beat them on a cold winters day, add fried potatoes and onions, pork chops, and cole slaw. No I'm not talking about those wimpy white beans, I talking about the manly PINTO bean, big brown and bad to the bone, but way, way better with a nice big fat ham hock to give you something to sink your teeth into?? as my Daddy used to say, "that will put lead in your pencil!". OHHH, and I almost forgot buttermilk cornbread, cooked with grease in a big ole hot black cast iron skillet, Oh LORDY, I'm comin home!

oh and BD Popeye, you need to bring yur little wifey down here, and we could show those girls how big boys put on a layer of "subcutaneous" fat, to carry them through winter, or at least into the "promised land"!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The AB1 reactor alone saves, every 20 years a Nimitz class carrier has to have its two A4W reactors refueled, the cost of such for the Last one refueled was 10 Billion dollars on the USS George Washington. Your estimated is what 14-15 Billion that means a savings of 9-10 Billion over the life of the hull.

Damn ! no, cost about 3,5 Billion dollars ;)
 
I put one sentence in boldface ...
Kendall Touts Acquisition Gains, But Warns of Troubled Programs
The U.S. Defense Department’s chief weapons buyer touted policy changes that he said have helped curb the cost of major weapons programs, but acknowledged that some acquisition efforts remain problematic.

Frank Kendall, an attorney who serves as the Pentagon’s undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, discussed the issues in the third annual report analyzing the performance of the defense acquisition system. The document was released Monday.

“Incentives are motivating better performance, but we must use them appropriately and carefully to avoid unintended consequences,” he wrote in the summary. “The linkage between prime contract profit margin and performance is being strengthened. New data confirm that first-tier subcontract margins are generally higher than those on our prime contracts. This factual observation needs further analysis from a policy perspective. Subcontract margins should be reasonable and also tied to performance. The data suggest that we have more work to do in this area.”

He added, Cost growth on our major programs is generally at or better than historical levels, but outliers remain a problem.”

The document cites as outliers such programs as the Army’s Paladin howitzer, digital radio and network systems, the Navy’s DDG-1000 guided-missile destroyer program and Littoral Combat Ship; and the Air Force’s RQ-4 Global Hawk and MQ-9 Reaper drones, Space-based Infrared System and Advanced Extremely High Frequency satellite systems.

During a panel discussion
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by DefenseOne’s Marcus Weisgerber on Tuesday in Washington, D.C., Kendall and other military acquisition officials warned that hundreds of weapons programs — from C-130s cargo planes to AH-64 Apache attack helicopters — may be cut or stopped altogether if Congress can’t agree on a budget for fiscal 2016, which began Oct. 1.

At the event, Kendall also warned about the risks of further consolidation in the defense industry. Lockheed Martin Corp., the world’s largest defense contractor, this summer entered into an agreement to buy Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., the helicopter maker, from United Technologies Co. for $9 billion.

“If this trend continues, which is what I was pointing out, we will end up at the point where we have two or maybe three primes who are essentially the sources for all the commodities being bought,” Kendall said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
this is interesting:
US Navy, Raytheon demonstrate network-enabled Tomahawk cruise missiles in flight
Flight test validates weapon's unmatched flexibility and capability
SAN NICOLAS ISLAND, Calif., Oct. 5, 2015

A
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Block IV cruise missile successfully showed it can take a reconnaissance photo and follow orders to re-target in mid-flight during a test conducted by the U.S. Navy and Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN).

During the test, a missile launched from the guided missile destroyer USS Gridley (DDG 101) used its onboard camera to capture battle damage indication imagery and then transmitted the image to fleet headquarters via its two-way UHF SATCOM datalink. The missile then entered a loiter pattern to await further instructions.

Meanwhile, strike controllers at the U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain retargeted the missile to a new aim point on the Navy's range at San Nicolas Island, off the coast of southern California. The missile performed a vertical dive and struck the designated target.

"We have once again proven the flexibility and utility of the Tomahawk Block IV missile, which has an unprecedented record of reliability and combat success." said Dave Adams, Raytheon Tomahawk senior program director.

The test was designed to show that the missile's strike controllers, located at multiple fleet headquarters, can control and redirect multiple missiles simultaneously. To reduce testing costs, only one of the large salvo of missiles was a live launch. The rest were flown via computer simulation through various missions directed by forward deployed strike controllers.

"Tomahawk continues to be the weapon of choice for combatant commanders requiring very long range, precision strike, with the flexibility to loiter and re-direct after launch," said Adams. "No other weapon has this capability."
and the source
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

goes on with the description of Tomahawk, Raytheon
 
updating ...
Air Force Delays New Bomber Contract by ‘Couple of Months’

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

... and updating again:
USAF in ‘Final Closing Phase’ of Bomber Contract
The US Air Force is in the final phase of discussion before awarding a contract for the next-generation bomber, and expects an announcement very soon.

“We’re in the final closing phase and it’s going well and you should expect to hear something pretty soon,” William LaPlante, assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, said during an event hosted by Defense One on Tuesday.

Even if the Pentagon is forced to operate under a yearlong continuing resolution, the Air Force will proceed with the contract award for the Long Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) on schedule, he noted.

Industry is still holding its breath for the long-delayed contract, which could come anytime in the next few months. The Pentagon had planned to make the decision on who will build the new bomber fleet first this summer, then early fall. Most recently, one Air Force official estimated the announcement sometime in the next few months.

The Pentagon is still studying whether to go with a proposal from Northrop Grumman, builder of the B-2 stealth bomber, or a Boeing-Lockheed Martin team.

The Pentagon is drawing lessons learned from the McDonnell Douglas/General Dynamics A-12 Avenger II, an all-weather, carrier-based stealth bomber planned for the Navy and Marine Corps, according to acquisition chief Frank Kendall. The program was beset by cost overruns and major delays, which led to its cancellation in 1991.

The A-12 is a perfect example of a “black,” or classified, program that went very wrong, Kendall said. The Pentagon had a “bad business arrangement” for the program, he said: The two contractors were teamed for development of the aircraft, with the idea that they would then compete for the production contract. At the same time, the companies struggled to build the technology needed for the state-of-the-art aircraft.

The A-12 program and its cancellation led to a ban on fixed-price development contracts, Kendall said.

“It was sort of a perfect storm of things that we should not have done,” Kendall said.

The Pentagon is taking measures to ensure the LRS-B program does not go the way of A-12 by focusing on using mature technologies rather than launching new developments. The program is also unusually advanced in terms of design and testing; the Air Force already has two robust prototypes in hand.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Bernard

Junior Member
"These Cruise Missiles Will Go Mach 3
A new generation of engines will allow cruise missiles to hit speeds never before imagined
Cruise missiles are about to get a whole lot faster. According to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, engine manufacturers Rolls-Royce Liberty Works and Williams International are both developing small turbine engines for a new generation of faster cruise missiles.

How much faster? How about five times faster?

As part of the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL) supersonic turbine engine for long-range (STELR) program, both are working on compact jet engines that would propel cruise missiles at speeds of up to Mach 3.2, or 2,435 miles an hour.

Such a missile would be as fast as the SR-71 Blackbird, the fastest plane ever built. The venerable Tomahawk cruise missile, by comparison, is powered by a small turbojet engine that flies at relatively pokey 550 miles an hour.

....... To continue click link

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

Brumby

Major
"These Cruise Missiles Will Go Mach 3
A new generation of engines will allow cruise missiles to hit speeds never before imagined
Cruise missiles are about to get a whole lot faster. According to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, engine manufacturers Rolls-Royce Liberty Works and Williams International are both developing small turbine engines for a new generation of faster cruise missiles.

How much faster? How about five times faster?

As part of the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL) supersonic turbine engine for long-range (STELR) program, both are working on compact jet engines that would propel cruise missiles at speeds of up to Mach 3.2, or 2,435 miles an hour.

Such a missile would be as fast as the SR-71 Blackbird, the fastest plane ever built. The venerable Tomahawk cruise missile, by comparison, is powered by a small turbojet engine that flies at relatively pokey 550 miles an hour.

....... To continue click link

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A Mach 3 missile will gulp fuel, so a larger fuel tank at the expense of warhead size may be necessary.

It has always been a trade off between speed, size and warhead. I am sure everyone in the game like the US is making development efforts. What is not reported is how far along they are in the development curve considering the lack of investment effort in the recent past.
 

Brumby

Major
... and updating again:
USAF in ‘Final Closing Phase’ of Bomber Contract

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"The program is also unusually advanced in terms of design and testing; the Air Force already has two robust prototypes in hand"

I thought this is a significant piece of news that there are already two prototypes built. That would also mean that more than likely the predominant technologies and design that would go into the LRSB are already bedded down.
 
Last edited:
Top