US Government Shocks Intel With a Ban on Xeon Supercomputers in China

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ultra

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Just as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
opens the regular staff meetings before a dramatically reduced
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
conference, it is a good time to review how government and enterprises don’t see eye to eye when it comes to strategic business.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China’s Tianhe-2 supercomputer is world’s fastest supercomputer, at 33 PFLOPS demonstrated and 55 PFLOPS theoretical performance.

Remember the Tianhe-2 machine at Guangzhou Supercomputer Center, the current World’s number one according to Top 500 Supercomputer list? Unlike some other China supercomputers – Tianhe-2 is fully Intel based machine, the world’s largest assembly of Intel Xeon CPUs and Xeon Phi accelerators.

Even after Intel ‘opened the kimono’ and gave a nearly 70% discount on its processors and accelerators, it has given Intel, and therefore US technology sector a major foothold in China and Asian region as such. Over the course of past two years, we were involved in a lot of discussions with Intel staff who were not privy to see the financial impact of the deal — and even argued our undoubtedly solid information. We’re not here to report how things should be, or are in marketing and investor presentations to its numerous staff, but how things really are.

During 2015, the Tianhe-2 supercomputer was supposed to be doubled in its size, up to 110 PFLOPs peak, again using the very same Intel processors and accelerators. Since now these are mature products with lower real manufacturing cost for Intel, they could finally make some real money.

Well, it was not to be: our tweety bird from the window chirped to us that Uncle Sam has put this supercomputer centre, together with National University of Defense Technology in Changsha, the system’s creators, and Tianjin centre, among others, on so a so-called “Denial List”, which prevents any high technology from the USA to be sold to these sites. Our sources used even
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Knowing that these several sites alone are expected to order some 250+ PFLOPS of compute in the next few years (around 500,000 top-end Broadwell-EP Xeon E5v4 processors, or approximately $1 billion high margin list price) and they were THE Intel friendly ones, this is quite a loss to Intel, thanks to Uncle Sam.

But, what’s worse strategic loss in time is that, based on this decision as an excuse, indigenous China high end processor architectures can now push the government to gradually remove any dependence on US. This means just one thing: an AMD or Intel x86 processor technology is increasingly becoming errata non grata. Should the Chinese government react in force, it will give the Chinese vendors the blank check support to go all the way a developing their Alpha, POWER and MIPS processors for both the government and the mainstream commercial use.

You may think they are not up to the mark, but remember how fast British ARM architecture became the dominant processing architecture in the world. And this group doesn’t need to worry about the antiquated x86 ISA, worry about satisfying the dumbed down shareholder masses, or overpaying their marketing and sales staff, as well as the fat check, golden parachute-protected CxOs.

They have taken the best that the USA has developed (some of key Alpha, GPGPU and MIPS architects left US over the course of past four years, a lot of them due to non-renewed visas) and discarded due to corporate shenanigans, and the continued developing it much farther than anyone expected both on hardware and software side.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Five years ago, ShenWei showed a CPU that performed faster than the fastest GPUs of the time. Now, fifth generation is approaching, slotting between Tesla and FirePro GPGPUs and next-gen Xeon Phi accelerators. However, this is not an accelerator or a GPGPU – this is a CPU.

So, thanks to Uncle Sam, China might not have a 110 PFLOPS Intel based supercomputer but it definitely will launch a 100 PFLOPS system based on upcoming 64-core, TFLOPS-class
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, with true blue CPUs possibly faster per socket then even the next generation Xeon Phi or Volta/Pascal-based Teslas. Next, of course 100 PFLOPS Chinese POWER8 or 9 — (thank you IBM) and then possibly even
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
– -it may come back into the high end field with renewed government support because of this Uncle Sam move. All are clean, elegant, scalable high end RISC architectures.

So who are the winners and losers from this?

NUDT and Tianhe may be the losers for now, but only short term. They will simply speed up their HPC ARM plan.

Intel comes out the big loser from this and a lot: who will want to do a phased deployment large x86 machine in China now, and worry about future phases? Then comes Uncle Sam himself: they lost even that little bit of influence on the high end China HPC. How is that for “cutting your nose to spite your face?”.



VR WORLD’s Analysis: US government moves accelerate the Chinese CPU roadmap while curtailing juiciest sales for Intel and other US vendors.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Ultra

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
- where they also ban AMD and Intel based processors in government computers and instead opted for ARM based home CPU which they are licenced to build themselves.

The chinese have been building licensed ARM based CPUs for a while now (all the mobile phones coming out of China are latest ARM based), and they have also licensed build MIPS based CPU and Alpha based CPU for over a decade even developing it further along.
The point is that - even Chinese government is confident enough to ban the Intel based machine from its own government purchase list means they have "replacement" technology in place - and this move by the US government is only going to give Chinese companies the incentives and blank check (from the chinese government) to accelerate and build their own home grown CPU architecture. It is a bad move on the US part as they have already given China all technologies, knowledge, and tools it need to build their own CPUs (and they did) and this will only accelerate their development to catch up and maybe even surpass the american CPU development.

I think Obama's China strategy is going to back fire on US again - just like his TPP and anti-AIIB (and the US government backed IMF/WB) strategy did - it only help China to realize US will not want to be friendly to China and they must accelerate their own development and independence from US. Sooner or later China will be technologically independent from US - and US will suffer as it will have no leverage against China while China has leverage on US (rare earth metal for one).
 

Janiz

Senior Member
It is interesting to look at representation of nations over time. Japan is a shadow of its former self, 115 systems in 1993, only 32 today.
And what do you think about that? That they know and have technology from A to Z and don't want burn money on that?
 

Ultra

Junior Member
USA is just sick of Tienhe-2 sitting on top of the Top500 list. ;)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It is interesting to look at representation of nations over time. Japan is a shadow of its former self, 115 systems in 1993, only 32 today. China's first entry into the Top 500 was in 1995, up to 61 today.


There is a huge difference though. JAPAN DEVELOP ITS OWN WORLD CLASS BEATING SUPER COMPUTER BY DESIGNING AND MANUFACTURING ITS OWN CPU every time they came to the top. the NEC SX-6 for example made the Earth Simulator a record shattering beast it was that reign for 2 years at the top. China on the other hand use Intel CPU (and also NVIDIA GPU) to get to the top.
 

Ultra

Junior Member
The previous reigning champ "K Computer" was also completely indigenously designed and built - Fujitsu developed the SPARC64 VIIIfx CPU that enabled it to beat the previous Chinese champ Tian-He 1 by a factor of 4 times!

It will take a good while for China to be able to do what Japan did - indigenously design and engineer a unique CPU that runs on its own unique OS that would be a world beating machine.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top