And it still keeps coming.
How is it possible that a random anti-ukrainian blogger declares an openly hate-inspired writer "the best writer on Ukrainian public opinion concerning politics" and right away this is accepted as fact and his weired statements as true?
If it's inconveniant to the own storyline that the electorate evidently turns away from right wing parties, then the narrative simply changes to declare all the other political figurheads Nazis.
In such an environment reason luckily isn't required anymore to justiy action. Nazis are the mortal enemy, they're everwhere, behind evey rock. As such, simply pointing at someone and screaming "Nazi", without any explanation or reasoning, is enough to put that person outside of human society. Just like in the dark middle ages yelling "wich" was enough to get a woman burned alive.
Simply stating the ukrainian people are far right as a whole and therefore all their leaders are de facto Nazi just continiues the stream of blunt insults.
Also, how is military action against aggressive, broad scale military grade insurection and foreign military intervention per se a nazi policy?
If there were a violent insurection in Kaliningrad and surrounding nations would welcome and support it, would the russian leadership and public accept this as the free will of the people and abstain from military action to preserve peace in the area?
Or don't you think they'd condem this as foreign inspired moves to weaken Russia and then move quickly and decisively to crush that insurection with overwhelming military force? And if they did, does that then make the russian society ultra-nationalist-rightist nazis?
The same btw goes for the first chechen war, where the chechens decided they want their own state back. They didn't attack Russia, they just said we're a seperate country now.
So in the end, everybody is a Nazi which bring us back to the beginning in that circle. All the hate filled namecalling is completely meaningless.
How is it possible that a random anti-ukrainian blogger declares an openly hate-inspired writer "the best writer on Ukrainian public opinion concerning politics" and right away this is accepted as fact and his weired statements as true?
If it's inconveniant to the own storyline that the electorate evidently turns away from right wing parties, then the narrative simply changes to declare all the other political figurheads Nazis.
In such an environment reason luckily isn't required anymore to justiy action. Nazis are the mortal enemy, they're everwhere, behind evey rock. As such, simply pointing at someone and screaming "Nazi", without any explanation or reasoning, is enough to put that person outside of human society. Just like in the dark middle ages yelling "wich" was enough to get a woman burned alive.
Simply stating the ukrainian people are far right as a whole and therefore all their leaders are de facto Nazi just continiues the stream of blunt insults.
Also, how is military action against aggressive, broad scale military grade insurection and foreign military intervention per se a nazi policy?
If there were a violent insurection in Kaliningrad and surrounding nations would welcome and support it, would the russian leadership and public accept this as the free will of the people and abstain from military action to preserve peace in the area?
Or don't you think they'd condem this as foreign inspired moves to weaken Russia and then move quickly and decisively to crush that insurection with overwhelming military force? And if they did, does that then make the russian society ultra-nationalist-rightist nazis?
The same btw goes for the first chechen war, where the chechens decided they want their own state back. They didn't attack Russia, they just said we're a seperate country now.
So in the end, everybody is a Nazi which bring us back to the beginning in that circle. All the hate filled namecalling is completely meaningless.
