I think his comparisons by mentioning Australia and Europe is because Australia's Hobart class is replacing the much smaller OHP class they have, and Europe's FREMM class are replacing much smaller frigate precedecssors of their own, and I think he's suggesting there is a trend for successor classes of warships of a given role to be higher in displacement to their predecessor classes.
Of course, I don't think that logic can be applied consistently, afterall the USN isn't replacing Ticos with a bigger class of warship, and the Zumwalt class was greatly truncated and not a replacement for Burkes as they were meant to be.
As for the 055's future orbat proportion, what you suggest is possible, but I think lethe's suggestion of 055's eventually replacing 052Ds in production and role entirely is not that fantastical either.
Lethe has brought up the possibility of replacing 052Ds in production with 055s in the past, and before it revolved around the idea of the Navy eventually shifting from a three tier blue water navy of 12k ton DDG, 7k ton DDG, and 4k ton FFG, to eventually one of only 12k ton DDG and 6k ton "FFG" where the FFGs make up the something like 2/3 of the surface combatant number and the 12k ton DDG makes up 1/3.
Such a change would have to be far into the future, like which only occurs starting 2030 or something. But I think such a fleet structure is quite reasonable, and compared to the USN's current force structure which has an overwhelming number of 9k-10k ton Ticos and Burkes with only very few smaller frigate sized blue water capable vessels.
Personally I think an order of battle of 24 12k ton 055s, 24 7k ton 052C/Ds, and ~50 4k ton 054A/Bs to be achieved by the late 2020s is plausible and reasonable, whereby the 052C/Ds and 054A/Bs make up the bulk of the workhorse fleet while the 055s act in the traditional cruiser role.
Last edited:
