Type 001A (CV-17 Shandong) Aircraft Carrier News & Discussions

Discussion in 'Navy' started by Jeff Head, Aug 19, 2016.

  1. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    21,228
    Likes Received:
    26,644
    here's the related tweet https://twitter.com/HenriKenhmann/status/1132198904894697472
    East Pendulum
    @HenriKenhmann

    ·
    6h
    82 jours après sa dernière sortie et après une série de travaux d'agencement, le 2e porte-avions chinois reprend la mer ce midi pour la 6e fois depuis Mai 2018. Il n'est pas exclu qu'il aille rejoindre le porte-avions Liaoning qui serait en exercice en baie de Bohai actuellement.
    Translated from French by
    82 days after his last outing and after a series of layout works, the 2nd Chinese aircraft carrier resumes the sea this afternoon for the 6th time since May 2018. It is not excluded that he will join the aircraft carrier Liaoning that would be in exercise in Bohai Bay now.
    [​IMG]
     
    bruceb1959 and Hendrik_2000 like this.
  2. asif iqbal
    Offline

    asif iqbal Brigadier

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,465
    Likes Received:
    8,518
    Yes and I understand that but if CV-16 is training pilots then those pilots need to maintain their skills on a combat platform

    You cannot train 50 pilots and that’s it, after 6 months you will have to start all over the again

    Qualified pilots need to maintain their skill set and this should be done on CV-17

    It’s like a athlete who qualifies, he needs to maintain his stamina otherwise very quickly he will be down and out

    Carrier pilots being qualified and then rotated to land based naval stations is not enough to maintain the skill set, its a continuous process that need to be maintained 24/7
     
  3. gelgoog
    Offline

    gelgoog Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    1,199
    The thing is, from my perspective, once they switch to the CATOBAR carriers how well would the skillset they learn on the STOBAR carriers translate to that?
    I suspect that other than for landings not that well.

    What I mean is, perhaps it isn't worthwhile to train too many pilots on STOBAR.

    Plus it is highly likely they will use a different aircraft for those carriers.
     
    #3833 gelgoog, May 25, 2019
    Last edited: May 25, 2019
    B.I.B. and Intrepid like this.
  4. asif iqbal
    Offline

    asif iqbal Brigadier

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,465
    Likes Received:
    8,518
    STOBAR and CATOBAR two totally different carriers

    Yes it could be a reason but not sufficient to warrant no more J15
     
    B.I.B. likes this.
  5. Intrepid
    Offline

    Intrepid Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,566
    Likes Received:
    1,668
    Air traffic control and deck handling have similarities.
     
    B.I.B. likes this.
  6. Marjohn
    Offline

    Marjohn New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2018
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    20
    Most of the pilot training required for their qualification is focused on landing and not on take-off. To my knowledge, except perhaps for the approach speed, there is no landing difference between CATOBAR and STOBAR CV.
     
    bruceb1959 and KIENCHIN like this.
  7. Brumby
    Offline

    Brumby Major

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,148
    Likes Received:
    3,321
    In my view there seems to be an inordinate attempt to avoid the notion that the J-15 may possibly have some issues with stability when landing. The activities associated with the J-15 at sea has trickle to a minimum and there are no new production of the J-15 that we know of. When you consider that at any one time typically only 65 % of its inventory is likely operational that leaves bare bone to service training for its pool of pilots. There is no naval training aircraft to fall back on.

    The options are actually very limited Any navalised J-31 is years away and whether it is even viable is yet to be determined. In the interim, it is likely that China is working on the stability issue with the J-15 and once that is resolved we will see new batches and carrier aviation activities resume. You just have to be patient. Some things take time.
     
  8. bd popeye
    Offline

    bd popeye The Last Jedi
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    29,148
    Likes Received:
    22,674
    Really? I was unaware of this issue. If true the root cause could be that the Chinese do not have a smaller training jet for carrier pilot training like a MiG-29. I stated this years ago. The J-15 is a big aircraft for carrier duty. That instantly makes it harder to handle in all aspects of Naval Aviation.
     
    B.I.B. likes this.
  9. Hendrik_2000
    Offline

    Hendrik_2000 Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,384
    Likes Received:
    25,425
    You are reading too much of western propaganda. There is no issue with J 15 It has been operating for 7 years now 2 serious incident one fatal and one not so fatal , one bird strike
    That is good record considering China never had any carrier before and no one teach her or provide ready made carrier They have to do it themselves down to bolt and nut NO country has learn the carrier operation as fast as China

    They do train hard on the land And on average Liaoning was at sea 6 months of the years that is a good record
    From zip China now has 40 to 50 carrier qualified pilot
    Sailing aircraft carrier is expensive operation with thousand of sailor and airmen Unless you have planned you just don't sail anytime you want

    How many accident that US carrier pilot experience over the years?
     
    N00813 and KIENCHIN like this.
  10. H2O
    Offline

    H2O New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2018
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    77
    Are we sure that there is a shortage of J-15? IMO, the lack of photographic evidence may be for political reasons than technical.
     
Loading...

Share This Page