Plenty of people around the globe wonders ... ...
Plenty of times --- How come US Radio Free Asia and some Uyghur websites
in the western world had the abilities to announce ... ...
many Uyghur terrorists attacks just 5 minutes after it happened ??
Ohh, they must have superior clairvoyant abilities.
Do u guys remember a plane hijack stopped by brave passengers and attendents several years ago? The spokesman of World Uyghur Congress, Dilixat, claims that it was caused by Hans fighting Uyghurs for seats.
Lets just put aside how ridiculous that a fight for seat could happen under a "1 ticket-1 seat number" system, all the people despite the hijackers were not Uyghur, so, how could the WUC know what happened on the plane?
Only thing I can see from their speed of response is that WUC were pre-informed, if not managed, the hijack.
Germany just let a terrorism group exist legally on its territory. For what? For the votes from those poor brainwashed guys.
So-called "free media" kept spreading lies. The BBC use labels like "China use Paris terrorism attack to incite public opinion" for a journal about a 56-day-long hunt on terrorists. FKU western mainstream medias! I do not need the government to incite me since a guy I knew was KIA in that ATO!
Imagine one person was teaching you UrbanCQB123 several weeks ago, then all in a sudden u heared him got killed, when you and your friends are in sorrow, someone with freedom of speech says the cause he died for is a political show and those killed him are good guys.
Really difficult to hold dirty words in mouth, huh?
The terrorists attacked China, even those who threw bombs to Uyghur crowds in a bazaar, is under quotation marks EVERY SINGLE TIME. Those attacked west are undoubtful terrorists, and all those attack Chinese civilians must be freedomfighters, we know it very well.
CNN use photos of Nepal police repressing riot and claim it is Chinese government suppressing Tibetans. Foreign country repression is teleported into China.
AFP claim a crowd of Chinese people weaving slogans are "protesters expressing their opinion to the authority", regardless the characters written on all slogans are "招工", which means "hiring workers". HR meeting become a demonstration.
Reuters add the comments from WUC in every article about Xinjiang, but never mentioned that WUC is significantly funding and masterminding ETIM, a terrorism organization listed by American. Why don't they invite Al-Queda or IS to say something after a suicide bombing?
BBC report the successful Chinese ATO right after Paris attack. Even if the government published the sound record of the assult, BBC still could say "erased the voice of women and children". One of the most improtant priciple of mordern law-rule is "Who suggest an opinion, who show the evidence", where is your "original, unedited" record, my dear respected BBC? Lecturing that Chinese Armed Forces is capable to nothing but only slautering civilians, is that making you Johns feel any better?
NYT reported some new discipline of the party, and traslated Article 46 "妄议中央大政方针" into "discussing party policy in open manner", "妄" means "absurd, presuptuous, fantastic, irresposibly" in Chinese. Yeah, "
distort Party Central Committee's policies " become "discuss party policy
in open manner". Substituting the request on excuting resolution into request on the progress forming reslution, what a fantastic performance of editorial independence! Salute to the journalist Edward Wong!
Those bias, discrimination, double standard, despicable "mistakes", faked details......no matter they are systematic slander or "coincidence", they do not only obstructed western masses to learn the real world. Chinese people are willing to know how the world is and how there ware in other's eyes.《参考消息(Information for Reference)》 has been the bestselling newspaper for more than a decade. It is an official paper translate those relatively fair journal from serious foreign media. Moreover, there are grass-roots websites translating online news about China worldwide everyday, more than 10 as far as I know. These websites translate both news and the comments beneath them. So, they unveiled the reality hidden by officials that how the hostility burns wildly on Quora, Yahoo, Reddit, Dailymail.uk, NYTimes, Washingtonpost, Economist, Naver, Indiatimes, etc.
So you can see, the irresponsible behavior of so-called mainstream media not only fooled their people, but planted the seed of disappointed and hatred in the hearts of those Chinese people who are most willingly communicate to outside world, best educated, most open-minded, in a word, the hardcore of next generation.
There will be consequences, this is not threat, just statement. Since the behavior damaging interests, mental, even flesh of Chinese people is inevitable in such an atomsphere where defiling China is politically correct, it is ridiculous to assume that the victims will just let it go. Being aggressive without the awareness of payback is obviously unwise, but, to those private owned, profit-oriented, "free" medias, it is really awkward to let them bother considering social and public responsibility.