PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
From a serious publication.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Arms sales are just such an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Taiwan places particular importance on them, as they “strengthen military morale and show to the world the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” in the absence of formal alliance institutions or even “normal” diplomatic channels.
As another Taiwanese official
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, “when you sell us the latest fighters, it lets China know America would intervene on our behalf in a conflict.” The United States — the thinking goes — sells its most advanced and expensive weapons to its closest allies. In the same vein, during a commissioning ceremony for Taiwan’s first F-16V squadron — what its maker Lockheed Martin calls “the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
4th generation fighter in the world” — President Tsai Ing-wen
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that “Taiwan-U.S. defense industrial cooperation not only advances Taiwan-U.S. friendship, but also represents a firm commitment to the Taiwan-U.S. partnership.” Asymmetric defense would have Taiwan demote what limited commitment it receives from the United States, getting cheaper, lower-profile weapons in return.

Hits the nail straight on the head!
 

solarz

Brigadier
Obviously the guy knows absolutely nothing about geopolitics. The only thing he is right is about resources and energy imports. (And even here he tried to imply that Russia may not provide it to China...)

Hopefully I won't have the displeasure to read similar "analysis" of such "high-quality" in the future. Next time I will be pressing the report button against such propaganda and low quality "analysis"

Pretty sure China is self-sufficient in food.

As for energy, people forget that China is the factory of the world, and that's the major portion of China's energy consumption. This is far different from the energy requirement of China for war production.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
From a serious publication.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Hits the nail straight on the head!
Right, US sells F-35's to Japan/Korea/Europe, but not to Taiwan because a) a defector will go straight to Fujian and handsomely rewarded, b) Taiwan is infested with espionage, or c) F-35 will be added to PLAAF inventory upon easy conquest.

In what world will US defend Taiwan, after it blatantly abandoned Afghanistan, Kurds, South Vietnamese, and Syrian?

Let me guess, US will say: "Why should we risk our American blood when Corrupted Taiwan gov't has lost popular support, has low-military morale, has no will-power to fight?" (essentially victim-blaming and shaming like they did with Afghan puppet gov't). US will throw Taiwan under the bus just like it did with South Vietnam and Afghanistan.

These idiots are stuck in 1990's era where China navy was ass-backwards. The balance of power has permanently swung in China's favor, not just between PLA and ROCA, but also in local warfare in China's coastline against USN.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Right, US sells F-35's to Japan/Korea/Europe, but not to Taiwan because a) a defector will go straight to Fujian and handsomely rewarded, b) Taiwan is infested with espionage, or c) F-35 will be added to PLAAF inventory upon easy conquest.

In what world will US defend Taiwan, after it blatantly abandoned Afghanistan, Kurds, South Vietnamese, and Syrian?

Let me guess, US will say: "Why should we risk our American blood when Corrupted Taiwan gov't has lost popular support, has low-military morale, has no will-power to fight?" (essentially victim-blaming and shaming like they did with Afghan puppet gov't). US will throw Taiwan under the bus just like it did with South Vietnam and Afghanistan.

These idiots are stuck in 1990's era where China navy was ass-backwards. The balance of power has permanently swung in China's favor, not just between PLA and ROCA, but also in local warfare in China's coastline against USN.

I doubt that there would be defecting pilots this day and age but PRC moles are a very legitimate concern. Most are bought via conventional means like money/business influence but the scariest from the Taiwan perspective are ones who are doing it out of ideological reasons. A not insignificant portion of the ROC upper brass where born and raised during the Chiang era and believe in reunification with every fiber of their being. Even though they were raised to hate the CCP, reunification under the ROC banner is no longer a viable option and some of them have opted for the next best thing.
 

weig2000

Captain
Pretty sure China is self-sufficient in food.

As for energy, people forget that China is the factory of the world, and that's the major portion of China's energy consumption. This is far different from the energy requirement of China for war production.

China's daily oil consumption is about 12Mbpd, of which 3.8Mbpd are domestic production. Chinese import of oil from Russia in 2020 was at about 1.67Mbpd. China is also aggressively moving towards clean energy and electric car. In a large-scale war scenario, approximately half of China's oil production and supply could be guaranteed. Oil would be rationed and export industry would be significantly curtailed. It's sustainable for war machine and war economy from energy consumption standpoint.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
I doubt that there would be defecting pilots this day and age but PRC moles are a very legitimate concern. Most are bought via conventional means like money/business influence but the scariest from the Taiwan perspective are ones who are doing it out of ideological reasons. A not insignificant portion of the ROC upper brass where born and raised during the Chiang era and believe in reunification with every fiber of their being. Even though they were raised to hate the CCP, reunification under the ROC banner is no longer a viable option and some of them have opted for the next best thing.

You can't even call them PRC moles in Taiwan, because there are far too many of them
30 years ago, those supporting reunification (of some sort) would have constituted a majority of the population in Taiwan

Today, depending on the circumstances, 11%-29% of the Taiwanese population support reunification with mainland China

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top