PLA Navy news, pics and videos

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I've noticed the count in recent day is make up of disproportionate number of J-16. I recall previously it was a more even spread of J-10, J-11B, J-16, H-6 and Y-8. There was one day were there was even a J-7.

Could this be some J-16D mixed in and disguising themselves as multiple J-16 each?
 
Last edited:

FangYuan

Junior Member
Registered Member
I've noticed the count in recent day is make up of disproportionationate number of J-16. I recall previously it was a more even spread of J-10, J-11B, J-16, H-6 and Y-8. There was one day were there was even a J-7.

Could this be some J-16D mixed in and disguising themselves as multiple J-16 each?

That's interesting. Before that, China has started researching to convert J-6 and J-7 into UAV. Imagine hundreds of J-7s flying over Taiwan airspace, it would overload their air defense system.
 

Sczepan

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Meanwhile the western media are playing out that Mianland China is sending large numbers of military aircraft "into Taiwan AIR SPACE" rather than provide accurate news on Air Defence IDENTIFICATION Zone.
not all of them - stupid medias don't know the difference,
informed people tell it and (of course) inform, that the only way to open waters is to cross ADIZ of Taiwan or Japan adiz_map.png
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
That's interesting. Imagine hundreds of J-7s flying over Taiwan airspace, it would overload their air defense system. Old technology has its advantages.
Why risk using costly J-7?
IMO it would far more cost effective to swarm the sky with cheap drones and use them to strike important military targets (radars, anti-air, HQ, airbases)
 

FangYuan

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why risk using costly J-7?
IMO it would far more cost effective to swarm the sky with cheap drones and use them to strike important military targets (radars, anti-air, HQ, airbases)

Many J-7s are old and reaching the end of their life. Instead of letting it fall on its own during drills and training like what happened in India, China could use up its remaining value.
 

lcloo

Captain
Why risk using costly J-7?
IMO it would far more cost effective to swarm the sky with cheap drones and use them to strike important military targets (radars, anti-air, HQ, airbases)
Old and Decommisoned J7's current value is close to a few thousand dollars. They are going to scrap yard or museum or use as target for live fire exercises. Using them as cheap decoy drones to draw enemy's expensive anti-aircraft missiles does sound logical.
 
Top