PLAN breaking news, pics, & videos

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Engine power is not an issue here I believe the prototype has some vibration problem due to Ukrainian engine but they have resolve it This question has been answer ad nauseum but this guy Asif keep harping on it very annoying
In time they will show up with the load
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/the-plan-lcac-type-726-yuyi-class.t5620/page-60

Here comes the Chinese fan boy who can’t take any comment which is critical of any Chinese equipment

A definition of fan boy pure and simple

Show me a photo of a LCAC entering and leaving the well deck then talk until then keep trolling

I am realistic I say when things are good and also when they are not
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Here comes the Chinese fan boy who can’t take any comment which is critical of any Chinese equipment

A definition of fan boy pure and simple

Show me a photo of a LCAC entering and leaving the well deck then talk until then keep trolling

I am realistic I say when things are good and also when they are not

Here it is. Now who is blind and troll you or me ?
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/the-plan-lcac-type-726-yuyi-class.t5620/page-67
47359378371_aed1909c4d_k.jpg


46444384655_843afef87b_k.jpg
 
Last edited:

kickars

Junior Member
Show me a photo of a LCAC entering and leaving the well deck then talk until then keep trolling

I am realistic I say when things are good and also when they are not
If you can type Chinese, these videos are on the 2nd on Google.

From 01:17
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


From 00:46
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


They are from 2 and half years ago. I don't understand why people here still don't believe PLAN has the ability to deploy LCACs from Type-071. That's been done for years...

Sure, those Type-726 aren't perfect, either because of its engine or certain part of its design. But keep on saying those LCACs have never entering and leaving the well deck of Type-071 is just untrue.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
By entering and leaving the well deck eveyeone and his dog knows while loaded NOT unloaded

By posting photos of unloaded LCAC you just prove my point further

So I have not seen a video of LCAC loaded with a load like a IFV entertaining and leaving the well deck of the LPD

I will now wait for about 100 posts trying to prove me wrong
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
By entering and leaving the well deck eveyeone and his dog knows while loaded NOT unloaded

By posting photos of unloaded LCAC you just prove my point further

So I have not seen a video of LCAC loaded with a load like a IFV entertaining and leaving the well deck of the LPD

I will now wait for about 100 posts trying to prove me wrong

I'm leaning towards the Type-726 being deemed low priority rather than having technical issues.

We can see that the 6 of the LCACs were built about 10 years ago. Apparently there were technical issues then, but they've had many years to resolve.
So given that the LCACs are a known quantity, it would be very surprising if they restarted production in the past 2 years without being happy with the technical fixes.

In comparison, the shipyard has seen Destroyer production double in the past 2 years, along with the introduction of new ship types such as the Type-55, aircraft carrier, etc
And we saw previously how the Type-52Cs were sitting in the shipyard for a very long time, because priority was given to the fitout of the newer Type-52Ds being launched.

So I think we're seeing something similar, with the Type-55, Type-52D and aircraft carriers being top priority.
With the LCACs being pushed to the back of the queue for now.
 

Tetrach

Junior Member
Registered Member
By entering and leaving the well deck eveyeone and his dog knows while loaded NOT unloaded

By posting photos of unloaded LCAC you just prove my point further

So I have not seen a video of LCAC loaded with a load like a IFV entertaining and leaving the well deck of the LPD

I will now wait for about 100 posts trying to prove me wrong

I'm pretty sure I already posted this photo.
t013784834a461c232e.jpg
 
Top