PLAAF JH-XX / H-X bomber project


Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Was referring to AVIC's "the next" tease and misleading people into believing H-20 would appear in parade.

Well technically it's the year before last year.


As far as I know AVIC never claimed "NEXT YEAR!" ... only certain outsiders - and esp. Minnie Chan :mad: :rolleyes: - hyped this "the next" to next year and even more the H-20 would appear in parade.
 

kriss

Junior Member
Registered Member
As far as I know AVIC never claimed "NEXT YEAR!" ... only certain outsiders - and esp. Minnie Chan :mad: :rolleyes: - hyped this "the next" to next year and even more the H-20 would appear in parade.
They didn't direct say it but heavily hinted that or encouraged this kind of theory in the comment in a very likely intentionally misleading way on many occasions.
 

BagPiper

New Member
Registered Member
They didn't direct say it but heavily hinted that or encouraged this kind of theory in the comment in a very likely intentionally misleading way on many occasions.
Sounds like professor/general ZZZ's tactics have been put into practice by the entire institution. ;)
 

Bltizo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
They didn't direct say it but heavily hinted that or encouraged this kind of theory in the comment in a very likely intentionally misleading way on many occasions.
I believe what AVICs words on the video was "the next"

There was never any hint it would emerge in the next year after that video, in fact the way I interpreted it was that the teased aircraft would be "the next" major aircraft (from XAC).

It is the fault of places like SCMP who misinterpreted the meaning of the image and carried forwards with ridiculous theories.
 

kriss

Junior Member
Registered Member
I believe what AVICs words on the video was "the next"

There was never any hint it would emerge in the next year after that video, in fact the way I interpreted it was that the teased aircraft would be "the next" major aircraft (from XAC).

It is the fault of places like SCMP who misinterpreted the meaning of the image and carried forwards with ridiculous theories.
It usually happens in the comment section in their weibo post or those of other posts with relevant topic so might be hard to track from here. And isn't the next basically mimicking same scene in an earlier american tease of B-21?

But that's off topic enough and not really relevant. I do believe PLAAF is more authoritative and this has a slightly higher chance of leading to something.
 

longmarch

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well, people fell for that not because they don't know the difference between the next and next year; it's because China doesn't advertise its weapon program like this and it's a departure from established practice. What purpose does it serve is anyone's guess.
 

Nobonita Barua

Senior Member
Registered Member
Is there a CCTV video you can provide showing that segment? Otherwise, it could be a PS'ed image.
Naah, found that in that blog. It says the video appeared at January 12 at CCTV. In the video of January 5 there was no explicit mention of 2021. I don't follow CCTV. So anyone verifying this would ke good.
 

Top