PLA Anti-Air Missile (SAM) systems


by78

Lieutenant General
I have some experience with CGI renderers, so I can tell one when I see it.

Oh, and btw I reported you to the moderators. This isn't the first time you disparage other forum members with such disgusting language.

You mistook the image as CGI despite your experience with CGI renderers, and you question my advice? Seriously, have your eyes examined by an ophthalmologist for macular degeneration. You might just thank me later.

P.S. I get it, you love your report button. You don't have to tell me that because all Karens love to complain. Yes, I'm being sarcastic now. Please don't cry or pop a vein.
 
Last edited:

ougoah

Colonel
Registered Member
There's simply no way the vehicle must stop in order for search radar to be used. It shows that in the video but that doesn't mean it couldn't perform shooting and guidance on the move. That would be a minimum requirement and the HQ-17 has long been shooting on the move.
 

nlalyst

Junior Member
Registered Member
There's simply no way the vehicle must stop in order for search radar to be used. It shows that in the video but that doesn't mean it couldn't perform shooting and guidance on the move. That would be a minimum requirement and the HQ-17 has long been shooting on the move.
HQ-17 uses what appears to be a much lighter search radar and the caterpillar based vehicle itself is likely heavier. The (A)ESA radar on the new vehicle looks rather heavy and could potentially lead to stability concerns. At least it may be a possibility, until we have evidence otherwise.

If you rewatch the segment where the missile is fired, do you notice anything about the front wheel? It's as if it is angled off axis? Not sure what to make of that.
 
Last edited:

by78

Lieutenant General
HQ-17 uses a much lighter search radar. The AESA on the new vehicle looks rather heavy.

If you rewatch the segment where the missile is fired, do you notice anything about the front wheel? It's as if it is angled off axis? Not sure what to make of that.

How do you tell the radar's weight by looking at CGI footage, much less that it weighs less than the one on HQ-17?
 

Overbom

Senior Member
Registered Member
HQ-17 uses what appears to be a much lighter search radar and the caterpillar based vehicle itself is likely heavier. The (A)ESA radar on the new vehicle looks rather heavy and could potentially lead to stability concerns. At least it may be a possibility, until we have evidence otherwise.
I dont understand. Are you saying that the HQ-17 must stop before using its search radar?

If that was true then the PLA would throw it straight to the garbage bin. Can you imagine an entire armoured column stopping every 10-20 seconds to allow the HQ17 to use its search radar?....

Since I dont believe that the PLA has kindergarden kids running it, I am on the side that the HQ-17 can use its radar, get targetting data and shoot while on the move
 

nlalyst

Junior Member
Registered Member
I dont understand. Are you saying that the HQ-17 must stop before using its search radar?

If that was true then the PLA would throw it straight to the garbage bin. Can you imagine an entire armoured column stopping every 10-20 seconds to allow the HQ17 to use its search radar?....

Since I dont believe that the PLA has kindergarden kids running it, I am on the side that the HQ-17 can use its radar, get targetting data and shoot while on the move
Actually, I was saying the opposite. That the new vehicle stopped, as shown in the animation, because it might have stability issues if operating the tall and heavy search radar in motion.

Some arguments as to why:

1, HQ17 uses a caterpillar vehicle, and caterpillars have historically been chosen for relatively heavier vehicles than those using wheels. I don't have the weight figure for HQ-17, but Tor-M1 weighs 34 metric tons. Only in the last decade have some very heavy wheeled IFV approached those weights (Boxer IFV)

2. HQ17 uses a what looks like a light reflector antenna, where much of the radar components (like REX, transmitters, signal processing) are within the hull
3. The new vehicle appears to use an AESA search radar.

AESA antennas are inherently heavier than other radar type antennas, because they carry all the power amplifiers within the antenna and often much of the front-end signal processing hardware too.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Short-range point defense SAM. I forgot the designation.

51509707312_75d5e7c7c0_o.jpg
51510508856_c41d78c294_o.jpg


I am guessing this is Norinco's Sky Dragon 12 (Tian Long 12). It used to be on a truck. Now its on a tracked vehicle.

Originally I thought it was something from SAST's FB series, but that video tells me it's Norinco's.

 

sndef888

Junior Member
Registered Member
Is it possible there will be a new quadpacked naval SAM with range of around 30km instead of the 50-70 of the HQ-16?

That seems to be the sweet spot nowadays for many medium range missiles like CAMM, HISAR, Aster 15. Also will be useful in defending against sea skimming ashms since the detection range is only 20+km
 

Top