Official Xi Jinping Thought discussion thread

drowingfish

Junior Member
Registered Member
Xi has some crazy longevity genes I found out. His father died at 88, mother still lives at 98.

He is now only 71 years old. Probably at least 20+ more years to live with superior and modern healthcare.

No reason to appoint a successor and create a possible opposition to himself, and friction in general, now, if at all.

In my opinion, it's better to let nature take its course and allow the most capable one to replace him after his passing.

There will probably be some round of infighting when the most capable one will emerge as the new emperor then again.

But, by that time, the West would have long disintegrated and all external pressure eliminated.
I am not sure letting Xi staying in power for another 20 years is a good idea lol. if he works lets say four terms, 20 years, okay I think it makes sense. another 20? it hasn't worked out well in the past, i dont see him being better than all those past emperors. he reminds me of Han Wu emperor, in terms of his place in the Communist Party as well as China's external environment. Wu Emperor did not handle his succession well at all, neither has any other of the best emperors in China, and Mao.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Lol That's actually funny.
Seriously though, China should start thinking about loosening the great firewall censorship. The country has now grown big and powerful enough to keep up with this indefinitely.
The end goal of the great firewall is to bring in everyone else, not remove it.

I do think as China's AI/algorithms gets even better and/or human bots from US start thinning out from getting less paid, restrictions will be applied much smoother.

In the "release version" of the global secure Internet, there will likely be no obvious visible restrictions. Algorithms would find hostile state actors, criminals and other unsavoury groups, maybe overload them with captchas, security verifications etc, leading to a soft ban that would escalate to a hard ban if unnatural activity continues. Normal users would not really see the process.
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
Xi should create a coherent story about how, what, why of Tiananmen square story from their perspective. You can take references to fall of the soviet union, Maidan movement, hong kong, USAID NGO in eastern Europe. How Deng's action prevented the illegal take over of China. Either make an official documentary/docu serie or hire some "independent" docu maker to do, something like Netflix Chernobyl.
Putting the emphasis on the traitorous parts of it, especially given with all the stuff coming out during this USAID and DOGE battle.

Then make it mandatory to embed that story in every AI model made in China. See if they still like Xi's version of the Tiananmen story and if they are still hungry to prompt about it.
 

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
Xi should create a coherent story about how, what, why of Tiananmen square story from their perspective. You can take references to fall of the soviet union, Maidan movement, hong kong, USAID NGO in eastern Europe. How Deng's action prevented the illegal take over of China. Either make an official documentary/docu serie or hire some "independent" docu maker to do, something like Netflix Chernobyl.
Putting the emphasis on the traitorous parts of it, especially given with all the stuff coming out during this USAID and DOGE battle.

Then make it mandatory to embed that story in every AI model made in China. See if they still like Xi's version of the Tiananmen story and if they are still hungry to prompt about it.
This! The way they currently dodge the issue at home pretending it did not exist in history is really baffling. It is not like that there were still a whole lot of libtards within the system.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
This! The way they currently dodge the issue at home pretending it did not exist in history is really baffling. It is not like that there were still a whole lot of libtards within the system.
I think the government just doesn't find it very interesting. It's like US doesn't really talk super much about MOVE bombings or Kent state massacre. Old history and the current leading guys are so far removed from the leading guys then.

They still ban "people" (I.e. US bots) today if they constantly talk about it, not because it's relevant or sensitive, but because if you saw a lot of foreign adversaries spam the same lines over and over again like a broken record, you'd also just ban them so they're not manipulating the algorithm.

As the algorithims get way more sophisticated with every generation, "censorship" will become less and less noticable, less false alarms, less wrongful bans etc.

It's defintely not anywhere near a top official's pay grade to speak about 1989 June 4. But maybe it's possible for a lower instance, some department with people studying history/political history, with connections to some filmmakers/journalists etc to make a documentry.
 
Last edited:

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
I think the government just doesn't find it very interesting. It's like US doesn't really talk super much about MOVE bombings or Kent state massacre. Old history and the current leading guys are so far removed from the leading guys then.

They still ban "people" (I.e. US bots) today if they constantly talk about it, not because it's relevant or sensitive, but because if you saw a lot of foreign adversaries spam the same lines over and over again like a broken record, you'd also just ban them so they're not manipulating the algorithm.

As the algorithims get way more sophisticated with every generation, "censorship" will become less and less noticable, less false alarms, less wrongful bans etc.

It's defintely not anywhere near a top official's pay grade to speak about 1989 June 4. But maybe it's possible for a lower instance, some department with people studying history/political history, with connections to some filmmakers/journalists etc to make a documentry.
CPC not clearly reaffirming its position on the issue leaves the social media platforms unsure of where the red lines are in censorship. Often the platforms just overreact to be on the safe side and kill all posts that contain 1989-6-4 the date, Tiananmen Square the name, etc. regardless of the real intentions of the authors. That has created a lot frustrations among the wumaos.

On the other hand, some platforms that have libtards in control have also been taking advantage of this lack of clarity when they need to suppress their own dissents.
 
Last edited:
Top