North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

yugocrosrb95

Junior Member
Registered Member
Great collage, have you come across one for MiG-29 and PL-10NK and especially PL-15NK BVRAAM? To me that's the bigger deal, as imo AAMs and associated FCSs are much more difficult to build than ASMs/ALCMs.
Will do when I return from work.

Also North Korea has several years of experience with long range cruise missiles.
 

Gloire_bb

Major
Registered Member
Seems rather pretty evident it is not a chunky cruise missile and length seems to be around 4.5 meters.
Less. Su-25 from end to end(with pitot) is 15m. More like ~3.X m(seems close to KH-29 in size). Which is alright for an air breather. Chunky and chunky, it isn't intercontinental.
 

burritocannon

Junior Member
Registered Member
the tailfins on the bvraam most closely resemble that on the sm-2/gunslinger.
1764696831365.png

a tenuous argument, but considering the positioning of the body fins being further forward are more similar to sm-2 than pl-15, i wonder if this missile has actually more in common with american missiles than chinese.
 

yugocrosrb95

Junior Member
Registered Member
Less. Su-25 from end to end(with pitot) is 15m. More like ~3.X m(seems close to KH-29 in size). Which is alright for an air breather. Chunky and chunky, it isn't intercontinental.
It is 15 meters and 36 centimeters for length of Su-25 with pitot and looking again at images, seems to be at most 4 meters.
Could be same 3.85 meter length as Kh-35 series and making airframe rectangular would provide 30% more volume than cylinder.
If it is guided by GNSS and or INS along target recognition relying on optical sensor, no need for bulky radar components in missile.
Thus space needed for the missile control system can be reduced, freed up volume could allow for heavier warhead or larger fuel tank.
If missile has same or comparable warhead to Kh-35 series then expanded and freed up volume can vastly extended potential range.
At bare minimum 500 with up to 1000 kilometers is possible with precise management of engine output to ration fuel consumption.
Also MiG-29 9-13 aka Fatback that North Korea has could also carry it and even heavier up to 1.1 ton for each inner wing pylon.
 

mack8

Senior Member

defenceman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Hi,
so with these new missiles are NK mig29 Radar is compatible with range and finder
or they also been able to develop a radar for these fighter jets, if it’s true then they are
better then IAF if I’m not mistaken or all these pictures are not fabricated
thank you
 

Gloire_bb

Major
Registered Member
Hi,
so with these new missiles are NK mig29 Radar is compatible with range and finder
or they also been able to develop a radar for these fighter jets, if it’s true then they are
better then IAF if I’m not mistaken or all these pictures are not fabricated
thank you
We don't know what's exactly under the fairing. No one told or demonstrated us that. If we assume AAM work - at very least, original radar was sufficiently modified(you may refer to Turkish experience with Gökdogan/Özgür for what it actually takes to integrate your own missile on your own, without OEM support).

But as a matter of fact - yes, DPRK develops, produces and deploys domestic radars at scale. It's been a long while since they deployed any other(unlike even Iran).
 
Last edited:
Top