Modern Naval Warfare

IDonT

Senior Member
VIP Professional
To All,

I have found this article that roughly explains how naval warfare is conducted in modern times. Please read it before we discuss other naval scenario's involving the PLAN, JMSDF, USN, and others. It is very enlightening.



It is tempting to regard modern naval combat as the purest expression of tactics. There is no cover, there are no civilians and the area of combat is level and flat. This is not, however, the truth. The presence of land, changing water depths, weather, detection and electronic warfare, the dreadful speed at which actual combat occurs and other factors -- especially air power -- render naval tactics truly formidable.

The basic idea of all tactics (land, sea and air) is fire and movement: the fulfillment of a mission by the effective delivery of firepower resulting from scouting and the creation of good firing positions. Movement is a large component of modern combat; a naval fleet can travel hundreds of kilometres in a day.

In naval warfare, the key is to detect the enemy while avoiding detection. Much time and effort is spent to deny the enemy the chance to detect your forces.

There is also the concept of battle space: a zone around a naval force within which a commander is confident of detecting, tracking, engaging and destroying threats before they pose a danger. This is why a navy prefers the open sea. The presence of land and the bottom topology of an area compress the battle space, limit the opportunities to maneuver, make it easier for an enemy to predict the location of the fleet and make the detection of enemy forces more difficult. In shallow waters, the detection of submarines and mines is especially problematic.

One scenario that was the focus of American naval planning during the Cold War was a conflict between two modern and well equipped fleets on the high seas, the clash of the United States and the Soviet Union. The main consideration is for Carrier Battle Groups (CVBGs).

Contents [hide]
1 Order of engagement
2 Fleet formation
3 Detection and electronic warfare
4 ASW operations
4.1 Sonar operation
4.2 The ASW triad
5 AAW operations
5.1 Airborne early warning
5.2 The outer air battle
5.3 The inner air battle
6 ASuW operations



[edit]
Order of engagement
Once a commander has considered the geography of a mission, he examines the assets the enemy is believed to have available - the enemy's order of battle (OOB); what friendly units are needed to succeed at the mission objective; and the added constraints placed by mission requirements (time etc.). This produces a path of intended motion (PIM) for the friendly forces - not the route, but the direction in which the force is heading at any time and so the area which must be checked and passed through.

As enemy forces are encountered and (hopefully) identified, they are categorised by potency and immediacy and the friendly OOB altered to reflect this. There are four threat classes: A, B, C and D.

Class A is Potent and Immediate; this is a need to drop everything and respond immediately. This might be a gaggle of sea-skimming missiles racing towards a capital ship, or something as powerless as a tug - that is radioing the fleet's position to a more distant enemy.

Class B is Immediate only; this requires fast action but does not threaten the mission; for example, a small boat detected in the outer screen.

Class C is Potent only; this is a 'win' for the fleet commander: a significant threat detected far enough away that force can be massed to destroy it or to avoid it.

Class D is Neither Immediate nor Potent; a target of opportunity which is not a threat and the destruction of which does not aid the assigned mission.

This classification is similiar to the time management method of judging things to be urgent/not urgent and important/not important.

[edit]
Fleet formation
After establishing a path of intended motion, the forces are organised. The formation has several standard elements positioned according to a threat axis - the estimate of the likely direction from which an enemy attack will come. A threat axis will almost certainly change over time, as the fleet moves. There may be a single threat axis or one for each type of enemy: AAW (Anti-Air Warfare), ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare), and ASuW (Anti-Surface Warfare). However, in reality usually only one axis is used; the complexity of adding more tends to confuse the formation.

The positions in the formation are called station assignments. A ship's position depends on its abilities. Many modern warships can fight several ways, but some are better at certain things. AAW and ASW are the important defensive properties. ASuW conduct is usually offensive.

A standard formation provides a number of layers of defense, designed to give maximum protection to the fleet's high value units (HVUs) or main body. Furthest out are the picket ships, Combat Air Patrol (CAP) craft and early warning aircraft (AEW). These units operate at 200 nautical miles (370 km) or more out from the main body. The units of the outer screen operate between 12 and 25 nautical miles (22 and 46 km) from the main body. The inner screen is within 10 nautical miles (19 km) of the HVUs.

The outer screen is intended to detect and engage any enemy units that have bypassed the pickets. Its ships must be multi-role, but there is usually an emphasis on ASW, especially passive detection. It is quieter out there than near the HVUs and so detection is easier. Preferably there are helicopter ASW assets for 'stand off' engagement. The ASW ships are usually assigned to specific sectors which allows a 'sprint and drift' detection of submarines - the ship 'sprints' to the front edge of its sector, then slowly moves back across the sector. Passive towed sonar arrays operate very efficiently on the return leg. AAW ships in the outer screen operate to protect ASW operations and to attack enemy aircraft before they reach their weapons-launching points, so range of defensive weapon is more important than rate of fire here.

The inner screen emphasis is on AAW. The central task is to engage any airborne threats that penetrate that far. This means the threat is almost certainly a missile so AAW rate of fire is important. The more defensive firepower in the air the more enemy threats will be destroyed. For ASW the inner screen needs good active sonar. Any threat this close is too serious for passive sonar as immediate targeting is needed. Checking the area around and under HVUs for submarines is called 'delousing'. If possible at least one ASW helicopter is always airborne, to target detected contacts as quickly as possible.

[edit]
Detection and electronic warfare
In modern naval combat a deadly strike can be launched from 600 nautical miles (1,100 km) away. This is a huge area to scout. The double-edged answer to this is electronic warfare.

Electronic warfare (EW) consists of three elements -- Electronic Support Measures (ESM), Electronic Counter-Measures (ECM) and Electronic Counter-Counter-Measures (ECCM).

ESM is the passive detection of enemy electromagnetic (EM) emissions. The radiated energy of an emitter (e.g. radar) can be detected far beyond the range at which it returns a usable result to its user. Modern ESM can identify the actual class of the emitter, which helps identify the unit on which it is used. Passive cross-fixing between a number of units can locate a source to a reasonably small area and give some hint to direction and speed. ESM fixes are placed in three classes: Detected, Tracking and Targeted, depending on the accuracy of the fix and whether a unit's course and speed has been derived. Of course for ESM to work the enemy must 'co-operate' by using their emitters.

The fact that a missile launched on a passive fix from over-the-horizon is deadly creates a central problem for a naval force -- when, and even if, units should radiate, and if not how to detect the enemy? This is detectability vs. survivability. The need to obtain a targeting solution has to be balanced against the enemy's ability to do the same. Although once a commander feels that his fleet's position is known to the enemy a move to active emissions may be vital to prevent destruction, else the only warning of incoming missiles will be when they turn on their terminal guidance systems.

The control of emissions is called EMCON (EMissions CONtrol). There are three states, A, B and C. A is no emissions, B is limited emissions (no unique emissions), and C is unrestricted. EMCON is not a blanket condition across the fleet. The surface units can be at A while a sufficiently distant AEW aircraft can be at C.

ECM is both offensive and defensive, covering all methods used to deny targeting information to an enemy. Offensive ECM is usually jamming. This prevents the accurate detection and identification of incoming strikes until the jamming unit is destroyed. Chaff is also used to confuse AAW operations by creating radar decoys. Defensive ECM also uses chaff as well as soids, blip enhancement and jamming of missile terminal homers.

[edit]
ASW operations
Submarines are the greatest threat to offensive CVBG operations. The stealth of modern submarines (anechoic coatings, sound-dampening equipment mountings, hydrodynamic design, etc.), can allow a submarine extremely close to a HVU target. The move towards shallow-water operations has greatly increased this threat. The threat is such that even the suspicion of a submarine means a fleet must commit resources to removing it, as the consequences of an undetected submarine are too great.

[edit]
Sonar operation
The main detection equipment to both sides in ASW is sonar. In the ocean the main factor affecting sonar operation is temperature. Ocean temperature varies with depth, but at between 30 and 100 metres there is often an marked change -- the thermocline, also simply called the layer. This divides the warmer surface water and the cold, still waters that make up the rest of the ocean. Regarding sonar, a sound originating from one side of the thermocline tends to remain on that side -- it is 'reflected' off the layer change -- unless it is very noisy (active sonar, cavitation, firing weapons, explosions etc.). Pressure, salinity and the turbulence of the water also affect sound propagation.

Water pressure creates convergence zones (CZ). Sound waves that are radiated down into the ocean bend back up to the surface in great arcs due to the effect of pressure on sound. Under the right conditions these waves will then reflect off the surface and repeat another arc. Each arc is called a CZ annulus. CZs are found every 33 33 nautical miles (61 km) forming an pattern of concentric circles around the sound source. Sounds that can be detected for only a few miles in a direct line can therefore also be detected hundreds of miles away. The signal is naturally attenuated but modern sonar suites are very sensitive.

As in all EW the issue with sonar is passive versus active. Modern active sonar is limited to 250 dB (decibels), but this level of noise can be detected at about ten times the range that is useful to the operator, acting as a beacon to any submarine in 100 190 km. So a target needs to be nearby and preferably on the same side of the layer to be detected by active sonar; just where a commander would not like a submarine to be!

In passive sonar operation the thermocline is the major issue. On passive detection the radiated noise of a unit is only apparent across the layer in a narrow cone, undetectable unless units pass almost directly over or under each other. For a surface unit there is the option of towing a passive sonar array above or below the thermocline - variable depth sonar (VDS).

A VDS passive array can be put below the layer to detect approaching submarines and when the target is within strike range a brief and unit-selective move to active transmissions can quickly return a targeting solution. An added advantage of VDS is that while it is operating below the layer, a unit's hull-mounted systems can be used above the layer.

Unfortunately VDS is a blue-water solution. In shallow water, the high levels of biological, wave and tide noise, the influx of fresh water from rivers and the lack of a thermal gradient -- and therefore CZs -- make it a truly formidable environment to detect a sub-surface threat. Passive detection is almost impossible and surface units are forced to use active sonar to search. Because of this naval commanders hate operating close to shore or in shallow water, doctrine is that a fleet must act as if they have already been detected and maybe even targeted.

[edit]
The ASW triad
For successful ASW, a fleet must combine surface, air and subsurface assets in the most tactically efficient manner - if these assets are present. ASW engagements occur in three phases:

Detected - From any source a submarine is possibly (POSSUB) or probably (PROBSUB) in the area.

Localized - A submarine contact has been localized to a sufficiently small area to allow an attack with some chance of success.

Targeted - The submarine's bearing, range, course and speed are known with sufficient accuracy to attack with a high probability of success.

Area ASW is the coordination of search ahead of the main force, along the threat axis. Detection and localization are the objectives, with destruction if possible. At best, area ASW is conducted by units with endurance and potency: maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) at 150 nautical miles (280 km) out or towed-array equipped surface units 30 to 50 nautical miles (60 to 90 km) out are most common. If the air unit has magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) as well as sonobuoys then so much the better.

Local ASW is within the outer screen, 12 to 25 nautical miles (22 to 46 km) from the main fleet. Detection is strictly passive as the distance is still great enough for the HVUs to be safe. Once a contact has been made, helicopter ASW assets (with dipping sonar, MAD or sonobuoys) are rushed into the area. Three or more close passive contacts are enough for aerial delivery of torpedoes. Ship-mounted ASW weapons such as ASROC are reserved for when a contact is too close -- generally less effective, their role is to distract the submarine from attacking and buy time for a more effective strike. In modern combat depth charges are never used; they are enormously ineffective and have been completely replaced by guided torpedoes.

If a submarine is detected after it penetrates to the inner screen the issue is getting weapons in the water, even if they are not accurately targeted. All and any efforts to distract the submarine from attacking the HVUs are made. Torpedo evasion maneuvers are also necessary.

A general maneuver tactic against submarines is a zig-zag. A submarine usually relies on passive detection, not risking active sonar or a periscope observation. So to determine where a unit is heading the submarine needs Target motion analysis (TMA). This requires several minutes of passive contact and if the contact starts to zig-zag this process must restart.

The most effective means of finding and destroying submarines is another submarine. Called Hunter-Killers, they utilize the stealth advantage of submarines to track enemy submarines. The difficulty is that they have to be out of communication with the units they are protecting for most of the time to use this stealth. Therefore most submarines operate independently, having been given general rules of engagement (ROE) for reconnaissance, ESM and early offensive operations. Modern diesel submarines are almost as efficient as SSNs as Hunter-Killers. However diesel submarines lack the capability to stay with a fast moving battle group due to their slower speeds (20 knots instead of 35 knots for SSNs) requiring them to be deployed long before operations in a particular area will commence, or force the battle group to slow down to allow their diesel submarines to keep up. Diesel Hunter Killer submarines or SSKs would generally be deployed along the “choke points†formed by landmasses or shallow waters to interdict enemy submarines long before they could attack the battle group while the SSNs would tend to stay with the battle group.

[edit]
AAW operations
The central weapon in modern naval combat is the missile. This can be delivered from surface, subsurface or air units. With missile speeds ranging up to Mach 4 or higher, engagement time may be only seconds.

The key to successful AAW is to destroy the launching platform before it fires, thus removing a number of missile threats in one go. This is not always possible so a fleet's AAW resources need to be balanced between the outer and inner air battles.

There are several limitations to Surface-to-Air missiles (SAMs). Modern missiles are commonly semi-active homing. They need the firing unit to actively illuminate the target with a missile fire-control director throughout the flight. If a guiding director shuts down then the missiles still in flight will self-destruct. So the number of intercepts a unit can simultaneously prosecute are limited by the number of directors possessed, and clearly exposed the firing unit to counterattack.

Clearly this is not a good situation and the US Navy has spent vast sums overcoming this limitation. The result is the Aegis combat system - phased-array radar and time-sharing technologies combined with missiles that have an inertial flight mode if the director shuts down.

[edit]
Airborne early warning
The key to successful AAW is AEW. If attacking units can be identified before they reach their launch points then the battle can occur at the outer air-battle screen rather than the inner screen. An AEW unit in a race-track loiter 100 nautical miles (190 km) ahead of the PIM, with a fighter escort, is perfect.

[edit]
The outer air battle
In this area the interceptor aircraft of the Combat Air Patrol (CAP) are the principal element, whether originating from a CVBG or land base. CAP units protecting units other than their home base are called LORCAP (LOng Range CAP).

The CAP is usually positioned 160 to 180 nautical miles (300 to 330 km) from the units to be protected, along the expected threat axis. At this point the units will wait in a fuel saving loiter to engage incoming groups with AA missiles. As the engagements progress, relief units are dispatched to the CAP to ensure that later attacks are met with full weapon loads. If attacking units penetrate the outer defenses they can be intercepted with aircraft in ready-5 status, if used.

[edit]
The inner air battle
Within the main body, ship-based AAW is the main protection. AAW shooters are, in best practice, positioned to provide both layered and overlapping coverage. The optimum firing position is directly between the target and the inbound missiles. If the missile passes a unit on a tangent (a crossing shot) the probability of a kill (Pk) is greatly reduced. The US Navy prefers that Aegis equipped units should be kept in close proximity to the HVUs, with less able AAW units no more than 10 nautical miles (19 km) out along the threat axis with, if possible, further AAW assets 18 to 24 nautical miles (33 to 44 km) out.

Other AAW tactics include the use of picket ships in a silent SAM or missile trap. In a missile trap, if the main body is forced to use active emissions (they are already detected and localized) the one or two ships can be positioned in emission silence 100 to 150 nautical miles (190 to 280 km) out. When other units detect an incoming raid the, usually, cruisers can go active as the raid moves into their engagement envelope. However once these units go active, they are unsupported and are vulnerable to individual attack.

Silent SAM is a technological tactic. Some modern missiles can be fired from one platform with targeting and guidance from another platform and need never illuminate the targets themselves.

[edit]
ASuW operations
Traditionally, surface naval combat was fought with large caliber guns within visual range, but with modern ASuW, missiles, aircraft and submarine-launched torpedoes are now the predominant antiship weapons, with guns serving a secondary function.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_naval_tactics"
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Thank you for providing a very interesting and informative text to read. It's kinda off topic here though, as it is now. So we better make it on topic. :D As the text itself repeatedly stresses - the closer USN has to fight to enemy's coast and shallow water, the less advantage it has technology wise. I have little doubt a CBG could blow half the PLAN deep sea forces out of the water if the battle was in the middle of the pacific but at some 700-1000 km off the chinese coast, situation is different. Of course chinese know that and knowing the advantages of geography of the area, building up a potent diesel sub force is a very smart move. Another thing that is smart would be concentrating on the air force as the main antiship missile platforms and a greater number of smaller surface ships instead of a smaller number of large targets such as destroyers. That way not only do you deny the enemy of big targets but you greatly increase your maneouvability and reaction time over what a big ship navy can offer. If i was chinese, i'd use up my large surface vessels against taiwanese navy, save my aircraft/subs as much as possible for any potential combat with USN. So what if that means more surface craft would be lost against taiwan, they'd still be much more useful and capable play out their potentail against taiwans navy than against USN.
 

Kurt

Junior Member
I think you missed one important aspect: mines
Your suggested warfare tactics serve well against an enemy with little mine warfare capaility or a blue water fight. But as soon as you have a massive mine deployment things change. Mines take a fraction of the time to deploy than it takes to clear the seas of them. Modern multi-sensor fuzes and increased munition smartness reaching to human controlled mines will make sense even more complicated.

How do mines work?
Mine deployment limits freedom of movement, so it serves sea-interdiction and is a very cost effective SLoC attack. They tend to have nowadays multiple sensors, making single sensor information sweeping impossible and they often count ships on a busy route until targeting them. Modern mines can even use torpedoes for a longer area covered and missiles to shoot down the increasingly important naval rotary wing aircrafts.
You can use very simple vessels for deploying the most sophisticated mines, but specialised minelaying military vessels also exist. Hidden minelaying can for example be done by vessels imitating the usual civilian smugglers during wartime (an idea the Chinese militias train for).
The problem is, while mines and minelaying is compareably cheap, the time and costs for sweeping are extraordinary in comparison, so you can create a very effective sea interdiction with limited resources. Iran will show you the way in a possible future military conflict because mines are the essence of an asymmetric naval war.

My own ideas for future mines and mine warfare:
Mines could imitate sensor information about submarines for example and thus force on active emission for immidiate threat elimination. Once on active emission it's a cat and mouse game with the louder side at a significant disadvantage.
My pet idea are submersibles, similar to the latest drug smuggling types (Current drug smugglers with their cheap submersibles made in the jungle show the limits of US naval ability of detecting these coming to their own coasts), that can move manned and unmanned, have no pressure hull and can sink to the bottom of the sea from where they move slowly on AIP to position sensors, torpedos, missiles (that can take out the important naval helicopters and surveillance aircrafts) and submarine imitations. In order to enhance intelligence, such a network can be connected by fiberoptical wires (avoiding the significant problems of electrical communication under the water). Connecting such a deep sea base to some human intelligence for operations would make it not just a mine-complex, but a real naval-mine-bastion that will be most difficult to take down.
For this task the submersible could trail over a limited distance some optical wire, defending nearby land against naval enemies with the human command on land.
Another option would be a temporarily surfacing communication buoy with a communication wire connection to the mine-complex. The most elegant option would be wiring this or several submersibles with a manned bathyscape (with high demands on crew psychological endurance) or a slow diesel-electric submarine with good AIP staying power.
Such an intelligent naval-mine-bastion can operate on the defense as well as on the offense by moving into areas controlled by a superior enemy navy that is forced to leave through a creeping mine threat. Because of the inherent mobility I consider it possible that even enemy minefields can interdict the same sea-space, making it a no-go area for everybody.
The problems through mining will remain and are possibly amplified by smart and finally direct human control.
It's the naval equivalent of a road full of very smart IEDs, but with ever more stealth and sophistication and correspondingly more expensive and time consuming sweeping operations.

Looking at tactical possibilities of mine warfare and strategic implications:
Things get even more interesting if you consider fleet movements and mines. If you want an enemy not to pursue your fleet, in the First World War they deployed a submarine trap after Skagerrak. In the next industrial peer conflict this can be mines or the aforementioned naval-mine-bastions.
It gets really going if enemy naval mines or even my pet naval-mine-bastion just sets up in front of your harbour (modern Chinese idea of using old torpedoes as self-moving harbour mines). You may have the most powerful navy in the world, but you will need several months before you can leave your own harbour during a war because it needs this time to sweep the mine threat or you lose your capital ships. Additionally such ships in a harbour and not in the blue water are easily spotted and will have a hard time against incoming missile attacks. No matter what it takes, as long as a great surface fleet is in harbour a missile saturation attack is a very cost-effective way of destroying it.
Theoretically a combination of minelayers(of any kind) and guided missile ships could fix and destroy a superior naval surface combatant enemy.
Mines can also defend islands, like Taiwan or in a way Singapore. Imagine, when a conflict starts, there's a rapid deployment of smart munition mines, making it impossible for the invader to speedily move a naval surface or subsurface invasion force or helicopters to the target island. As a result there's plenty of time to prepare for countermeasures. The downside is that enemy mines can as well interdict all naval supplies, thus creating a large scale siege situation because most bulk transport is still naval. Mine-sweeping for open supply routes will be an extremely demanding task and the high-water mark of modern sea-control. The US Navy is currently developing mine-sweeping as an integral part of all their naval vessels, but they would also have to increase the number of hulls rapidly to achieve such a mission for one of the aforementioned locations or they have very secret new idea for the helicopters they prefer for this task.

Naval mines and Chinese geography:
Naval mines highlight the central weakness of mainland China in naval warfare. China has a very short coast with multiple island chains in front, creating ideal conditions for sea interdiction through naval mines and submarines in these littoral waters (look at Japanese shipping in WWII). So while it works to keep out other ships during a conflict, these other ships will also be merchantmen normally headed for China. So the island chains and naval chokepoints create just the necessary circumstances for an interdicted sea environment. During such an interdiction phase you can win everything locally, but you will lose everything globally. It's like winning the battle and losing the war because no country is and will be all self-reliant in resources. The sea-lines of communication are the veins of every economy and someone without access(it can also be through routes to the sea by friendly neighbours) will become anemic and unable to overcome his increasingly stronger enemy. So I fully understand why China needs a great blue water navy if they ever consider to apply real military pressure in the region and not just some North Korean style swashbuckling.

Just my 2 cents, enjoy reading and perhaps be convinced that non-violent solutions to problems are great.
 
Top