KJ-600 carrierborne AEWC thread

Blitzo said:

I'm not sure if you posted it with intent as a joke, but that's very clearly a E-2, identifiable even with the deliberate obfuscation by the op.

View attachment 127488

Click to expand...

No, I was stupid and got fooled

In my defense I just woke up when I posted it. In hindsight should've ran an image search

Regarding the data related to the testing of the US E-2C on the ski jump runway. Of course, I am not saying that the data of KJ600 can be exactly the same as that of E-2C. This is just a reference, not to mention that KJ600 has not yet been publicly decided whether to be listed on STOBAR.

i listened through shilao's talk on KJ-600 and they made the point that KJ-600 does not have the fixed 3-face dome, because they want to get the largest possible antenna on the radome to detect all these low flying subsonic missiles.

Cross posting since mentioned in the J-35 thread. Allegedly both the J-35 & KJ-600 were seen together

Video & few clear images of PLAN KJ-600.

aahyan said:

Video & few clear images of PLAN KJ-600.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771407006836179431

Click to expand...

Those were already posted on last page here:

KJ-600 carrierborne AEWC thread

Interesting, and even in September 2019 - at a time we had no clear image of the KJ-600 yet - a COD variant was discussed.

www.sinodefenceforum.com

Furthermore, if you are posting pictures from a tweet or a post, please take the effort to post the pictures themselves (uploading directly or uploading to an image host first) rather than just a low effort link to the tweet.